Philosophy Now Forum

Hobbes' Choice wrote:How could anyone BUT a moron write the Ouzo Prophecy?

How do you explain the position of the spokesman for the prestigious Spiritual Counterfeits Project, who said, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"

bobevenson wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:How could anyone BUT a moron write the Ouzo Prophecy?

How do you explain the position of the spokesman for the prestigious Spiritual Counterfeits Project, who said, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"

There is nothing to explain here.

His comments are a polite way of saying Thanks, but no thanks.

You are a fucking idiot.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:How could anyone BUT a moron write the Ouzo Prophecy?

How do you explain the position of the spokesman for the prestigious Spiritual Counterfeits Project, who said, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"

His comments are a polite way of saying Thanks, but no thanks. You are a fucking idiot.

You know, your reaction is equivalent to taking a Rorschach Test, which has detected an underlying thought disorder:
"The Rorschach test (also known as the Rorschach inkblot test, the Rorschach technique, or simply the inkblot test) is a psychological test in which a subject's perceptions of inkblots are recorded and then analyzed using psychological interpretation, complex algorithms, or both. Some psychologists use this test to examine a person's personality characteristics and emotional functioning. It has been employed to detect underlying thought disorder, especially in cases where patients are reluctant to describe their thinking processes openly. The test is named after its creator, Swiss psychologist Hermann Rorschach." --from Wikepedia