Philosophy Now Forum

"We are all whores. The term god means nothing and everything at the same time. Think about it.

We are all equal in the eyes of god. You are not above anyone."

Going to defend this anytime soon?

Let me help;

"We are all whores." factually untrue so false.

"The term god means nothing and everything at the same time." contradiction of terms therefore meaningless.

"We are all equal in the eyes of god. You are not above anyone." incorrect inference or deduction from premise. Also factually untrue if you take the Bible as the word of 'God'. Also false if you are a theist as atheists and pantheists are presumably not equal in the eyes of the theist.

.



..........................................................................................







Let's not loose the focus of this particular thread:





My thesis for this thread: We are all whores. The term god means nothing and everything at the same time. Think about it.

We are all equal in the eyes of god. You are not above anyone.



I am sorry you are unable to understand the universal philosophical thesis that I have characterized.


That's my fault - NOT yours.




I do feel that it is unfortunate that you are unable to enjoy the dynamic and compelling audio aspect of the video I used.





.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:Let's not loose the focus of this particular thread:

Lets not.

I am sorry you are unable to understand the universal philosophical thesis that I have characterized.

I'm sorry you don't understand that you haven't. What you have done is demonstrate that the only thing that Philosophy can truly call its own, Logic, is not in your toolbox.

That's my fault - NOT yours.

I know.

I do feel that it is unfortunate that you are unable to enjoy the dynamic and compelling audio aspect of the video I used.

The youtube clip looks to be much of a much with other documentaries of westerners casting their moral umbrage upon other cultures behaviours. That it uses a theist view in its title shows its cultural slant. As does yours with your illogical 'thesis' propositions. Which repeating by the way makes them no more sensible. Can you tell me how they relate to the clip your posted?