Philosophy Now Forum

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:41 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:02 pm

There isn't anyone here.

H talks about people on this forum behind their backs. I agreed with him sometimes, by nodding my head. So is he slandering their reputations. Gosh he's even accused people on this forum by actually posting shit about them, I mean who hasn't done that? It happens all the time on this forum.

All I've done is simply draw awareness, make aware the people he has dished out defamation to behind their backs, without ever truly knowing if they are actually a good person or a bad person.

Good people cannot be defamed so if you already know you are a truly good person, then there is nothing to get hung up about, when it comes to what other people think of you. Only you know if you are a good or bad person, not others.

Please share. People have a right to know what slander is being spread about them. 'Good people cannot be defamed'. Really? Defamation is defamation. It's irrelevant whether the defamed one was 'good' or not.

A good persons character and reputation that cannot be proven to be a lie. Cannot be defamed.

That's not the definiton of 'defamation'.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:50 pmYou laid your soap opera on the table in a public forum. You don't get to pick who takes notice, nor do you get to only have sympathetic types pay attention.

That's right, everyone is welcome to come and watch my soap opera it's all laid out on the table for every one to feast on.

I'm still confused as to your point?

I simply do not care who comes to the table to feast their eyes and make opinions of what I have laid out for them to see, everyone is welcome to come feast on my melodrama, including you.

I'm simply responding to the ones who are actually making sense by agreeing with them when they leave their opinion on the unfolding drama, I'm not looking for sympathy, what a strange thing to think.

I know what I am doing, do you honesly believe am I am looking for sympathy, seriously I'm not that weak as to being totally unaware of knowing what are the consequences of my own actions here. But I simply don't care what you or anyone else thinks of my drama, how many times shall I repeat that to you?

A million, will that number of repeats suffice, or would you like more.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:01 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:41 pm

Please share. People have a right to know what slander is being spread about them. 'Good people cannot be defamed'. Really? Defamation is defamation. It's irrelevant whether the defamed one was 'good' or not.

A good persons character and reputation that cannot be proven to be a lie. Cannot be defamed.

That's not the definiton of 'defamation'.

Defamation of a good character is slander. What I'm saying is if people know they are genuinely a good person, who can defame them?

Flintstone fred, you actually are beginning to sound like my father...It's almost like you are dying to put me over your knee and give me a jolly good spanking for being a very bad and naughty girl, but of course you wouldn't waste your energy on a total lying kunt like me would you.

Prove I'm lying about what H actually said to me? Until you do, shut the fuck up about who is lying and who is telling the truth, you know fuck all.

If you want a fight with me over my drama, fred, then go for it, I'll beat you hands down, I'll have you under this drama table before you know you are even downed.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:40 pm

Yes. And that's what you did. In court, those posts would be admissible. In court, you'd be, at the very least, held in contempt.

But we are not in court yet. I'll deal with that when it happens ok.

If you have beef with anything I have written or deleted on this forum then sue me?


See you in court.

Of what I am supposed to have written that warrants a court summons please, thank you?

Your welcome.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:50 pm
I'm a sucker for mysteries.

As I say: I'm a sucker for mysteries.

Well good for you.

What comes to me is ''Because this is what I am'' And I too am a sucker for a good ol lil mystery.

It's big business, the self. Wouldn't want that business put out of business now would you. .so just keep on being that good ol lil sucker.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pm
I know someone on here who had him begging her to be 'more than friends'. She saw through his crap immediately.

Wow, weird how he thought it was ok to tell me that he was seducing Lacewing on the chocolate thread at the same time his wife who he claimed to love dearly was dying of alcoholism.

Seems like he was only with me because Lacewing saw through his crap...then H said that Lacewing had been callous calling it off, saying she was not happy with him because he wasn't giving her enough attention.


Also saying he just needed someone to reach out to, seeking comfort because his life had gotten unbearable due to the evil his wife had become, the wife he loved dearly..but was also accused of being evil..evil, was his exact word.

And yes Fred I'm mad, I'm fucking mad as hell at myself for knowing all this and still wanting to be with him. I literally hate myself, and wish I was dead. I'm so sick of this horrible life. I used H for my own selfish pleasure, so I'm the sinner here, I am the one who has sent myself to hell, no one else is to blame, I am disgusting and deserve to rot in hell, which is the only place I've ever known anyway, so I'll be ok there. I'm used to life in hell.

And if you are reading H .... thanks for fucking nothing, oh wait, that's exactly what you did.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pmI know someone on here who had him begging her to be 'more than friends'. She saw through his crap immediately.

Hearsay.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:59 pmNuthin' I've posted here would lead a sensible person to conclude I'm doin' that.

Sure there is. Is it proof? No. Is it evidence? Yes.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:35 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:59 pmNuthin' I've posted here would lead a sensible person to conclude I'm doin' that.

Sure there is. Is it proof? No. Is it evidence? Yes.

So what?

If it’s evidence what’s that going to change?

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:31 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pmI know someone on here who had him begging her to be 'more than friends'. She saw through his crap immediately.

Hearsay.

No it’s not hearsay it’s fact ask H for actual evidence it’s not hearsay.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:48 pm

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:31 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:58 pmI know someone on here who had him begging her to be 'more than friends'. She saw through his crap immediately.

Hearsay.

No it’s not hearsay it’s fact ask H for actual evidence it’s not hearsay.

Just the fact that he seems to be trying to goad people into showing him ACTUAL pms and emails says that he wants to side with the male no matter what. If his buddy IC said anything similar it would be believed no questions asked. IC is about the most dishonest poster on the forum hands down.

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:35 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:59 pmNuthin' I've posted here would lead a sensible person to conclude I'm doin' that.

Is it proof? No. Is it evidence? Yes.

True! Whereas proof demands evidence, evidence on its own is not proof. I don't know of anything where evidence closes the final gap into ascertaining absolute proof. The only thing which completes the circle successfully is evolution, as manifested in biology and the very bones of the planet itself.

Dubious wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 11:33 pm

henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:35 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:59 pmNuthin' I've posted here would lead a sensible person to conclude I'm doin' that.

Is it proof? No. Is it evidence? Yes.

True! Whereas proof demands evidence, evidence on its own is not proof. I don't know of anything where evidence closes the final gap into ascertaining absolute proof. The only thing which completes the circle successfully is evolution, as manifested in biology and the very bones of the planet itself.

Exactly. Americans (who else?) don't understand the difference between evidence and proof. You hear it all the time and it makes me cringe every time.