Re: What could make morality objective?
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:25 pm
I sure hope you aren't older than me, because you sound like a 19 year old...
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I sure hope you aren't older than me, because you sound like a 19 year old...
How very altruistic. I expect you'll shortly be donating both kidneys?
How conveniently misunderstood.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:26 pm How very altruistic. I expect you'll shortly be donating both kidneys?![]()
Hitler, Stalin and Mao? Lesser criminals? The handicapped? Women? Foreigners? Enemies? The comatose and moribund? The unborn? Me?
Because they contribute until proven otherwise?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:31 pmHitler, Stalin and Mao? Lesser criminals? The handicapped? Women? Foreigners? Enemies? The comatose and moribund? The unborn? Me?
They all matter to you as much as yourself?
Why should they?
I trust you'll forgive me if I am not encouraged by the thought of trying to centre my worth as a human being in my mere utility to someone else. And I'm definitely not inspired to trust the process (whatever it may be) by which things are "proven otherwise."TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:31 pm Because you are more useful than not until proven otherwise.
For somebody who says "control is an illusion" I sure wonder if you DO trust anything.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:34 pm I trust you'll forgive me if I am not encouraged by the thought of trying to centre my worth as a human being in my mere utility to someone else. And I'm definitely not inspired to trust the process (whatever it may be) by which things are "proven otherwise."
Well, none of the things you're backing at the moment, anyway.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:35 pm For somebody who says "control is an illusion" I sure wonder if you DO trust anything.
That's a performative contradiction. Using this INTERNET thing. Built by strangers for your benefit. Having education at your fingertips.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:36 pm Well, none of the things you're backing at the moment, anyway.
No. The things you are backing at the moment.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:38 pmThat's a performative contradiction.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:36 pm Well, none of the things you're backing at the moment, anyway.
I am backing the status quo as well as its current trajectory (although things could move a little faster).
Ah, the fresh naivety of Evolutionary Progressivism. It wafts to the nostrils like a summer breeze over the manure pile.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:40 pmI am backing the status quo as well as its current trajectory (although things could move a little faster).
Ah, the cynicism of a powerless mind!Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:45 pm Ah, the fresh naivety of Evolutionary Progressivism. It wafts to the nostrils like a summer breeze over the manure pile.![]()
It wasn't on point. I will say for the third time, my skepticism was directed to the horses you were backing at the moment.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:46 pm You conveniently ignored the question. If 2018 sucks, which century and which country would you like us to teleport you back to?![]()