It is much less about convincing another person as it is about trying to get to accurate descriptions
about what is going on. This present issue — involving an exposure of the ruling elites in Israel to an examination of their policies and activities — is very much connected to questions about “who rules us?” and who controls how narratives and policies are decided, and how they have been decided for these last 30+ years of war.
My own view — I have no idea how I could prove it — is that there is a connection between social, economic and psychological decline in the US, and these 30+ years of war.
So I would stress a wide interconnectivity between events that might seem disconnected.
Maybe it is unfair to pound so mercilessly on Immanuel Can, but it cannot be helped nor should it be avoided. He embodies here fanatical religious projection and perceptual diseases of the mind.
We must confront this because we too are susceptible especially when we deny susceptibility.
Though belovèd IC is intellectually and constitutionally incapable of self-examination yet
we can see him.
The difficult part is seeing our own blind spots.
Now here are two Muslim men — the one on the right is quite an accomplished scholar — critiquing the very very strange (but core) Jewish belief about Jewry’s Eternal Enemy, Amalek.
Those two men are still within the larger belief system as zealots-of-sorts, but their analysis is interesting and helpful.
Palestinians as Amalek