Page 35 of 35
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:32 pm
by Dontaskme
To IC and his pathetic little sidekick
You are both reciting religious dogma from your brainwashed cult leaders who have also been brainwashed ad infinitum
You were not born with this knowledge..you’ve taken it on as a belief because you cannot handle the truth of reality.
I’ve heard it all before, you are not saying anything to me I haven’t heard a million times over, I’m embarrassed for you both.
Think about it....the very first human being started it’s life completely void of any conceptual ideas. But look at what you know now, you’ve become god knowers. You must be so proud. Congrats.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:42 pm
by Dontaskme
Every adult human being started as a baby.
What came first the baby or the adult?
I think we all know the answer to that...it’s so embarrassingly shocking how dumb intelligent humans are.
Just keep deluding yourselves fools.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:12 pm
by Dontaskme
There is no man / God relationship
Reality has no need or want. Reality just is as it is.
Relationships are forged from the false desire for need and want, no such relationship exists in reality, the belief has been sold to you as a lie. Your little inner child was abused by the lie which you carried through to your adulthood, that then continued abusing every newborn that came after with the same abusive virus.
Seems like a complete waste of space taken up by the trillion non occupied other galaxies ....but that’s irrelevant because here on earth a hairless ape who only showed up a few seconds ago was born especially to take centre stage strutting its I know god nonsense...and not just god, I know everything because I make it all up ...knowing full well that all those who come after me will also believe exactly what they are told to believe...and it came to pass ...we were all hooked , baited, and turned into a skool of fish dogs.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:30 pm
by Immanuel Can
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:12 pm
There is no man / God relationship
Well, you've made up your mind...so for you, you might just be right.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:40 pm
by Dontaskme
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:30 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:12 pm
There is no man / God relationship
Well, you've made up your mind...so for you, you might just be right.
Exactly!
that’s the magic of the invisible mind, it can make up just about any image it wants, for it’s nothing without its reflection.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:47 pm
by Dontaskme
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:30 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:12 pm
There is no man / God relationship
Well, you've made up your mind...so for you, you might just be right.
Those who know they might be right-in what they know live in fear of being wrong.
But those who know they don’t know anything are always right.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 7:57 am
by Dontaskme
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:40 pm
Well, you've made up your mind...so for you, you might just be right.
You do not make up your mind. The mind makes up you.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:44 pm
by Walker
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:32 pm
To IC and his pathetic little sidekick
I am honored, but unworthy.
Enough to be one of the bookends bordering and contrasting irrational belief.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:53 pm
by Immanuel Can
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:44 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:32 pm
To IC and his pathetic little sidekick
I am honored, but unworthy.
I think I have to be the "sidekick." After all, aren't you "the Texas Ranger"?
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:48 pm
by Walker
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:53 pm
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:44 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:32 pm
To IC and his pathetic little sidekick
I am honored, but unworthy.
I think I have to be the "sidekick." After all, aren't you "the Texas Ranger"?
Don't contradict her, she's ready to blow.
Thar she blows!!
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:57 pm
by henry quirk
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:48 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:53 pm
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:44 pm
I am honored, but unworthy.
I think I have to be the "sidekick." After all, aren't you "the Texas Ranger"?
Don't contradict her, she's ready to blow.
Thar she blows!!
Like I say: she's danglin' at the end of a rope...over an abyss.
Fixated on what's below, she will not climb.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:25 pm
by Immanuel Can
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:48 pm
Thar she blows!!
Then call me Ishmael.
Re: Putting ''Immanuel Can'' In The Religious Spotlight Part 2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:46 am
by Walker
Famous first words.
Melville had the good sense to not write,
"I am Ishmael."