attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 4:38 am
I'd like you to think long and hard about the following symbol henry:---->>>
%
Well, there's a lot to say about that symbol.
I'll cover some of the all, and leave what's really important for you, Henry, or an unknown entity to explain, or not.
- The arrangement of the shapes as a single unit appears lopsided in relation to the assumed vertical that would be created by the effects of gravity upon their three-dimensional representations.
- The geometric precision of the separate three shapes appears machined, which makes them close enough for the eye to assume the ideal they represent.
- Zero divided by Zero equals Zero.
- A percentage is a portion of a finite whole, the whole represented by two of the three shapes and a single, shorter version of first line shape that was diagonally situated in relationship to the two orbs that resemble holes, aka the percentage sign.
- As a portion of a finite whole, a percentage of that whole is wholly dependent upon at least one characteristic of the whole, and the whole is inclusive of that, or those, characteristics.
- A popular metaphor is the whole represented by an elephant. Any percentage of the elephant whole which is dependent upon the characteristics of the whole elephant is available to the perceptual capacity of any particular entity, although in the case of the elephant as representing a portion of reality, each percentage of the elephant is theoretically apart from and unique from the other parts, which just doesn’t make sense in the real world when considering that everything is connected to everything else. Of course, this also assumes that any particular entity is lesser than the whole, which oft’ becomes a bone of contention amongst philosophers.
- A diagram of the greater encompassing the lesser is a single two-dimensional orb encompassing a smaller orb, or a three-dimensional sphere encompassing another smaller sphere, and because in the real world the outer boundary of the inner orb need not be equidistant from the inner boundary of the outer orb, the orbital shapes need not be precisely machined with uniform radii to represent the ideal orb.
- Sometimes this is called a Venn diagram, named after a fellow with a speech impediment named Flynn who introduced himself as Venn while writing Flynn, two symbols of sounds so obviously wildly different that reasonable folks could get confused if using them together, as any PI would have learned if hired by Flynn’s, or Venn’s, wife to track down his goings-on at those math conferences.
- When the transmission of communication is limited to six symbols in configuration, and the three that are the object of this contemplation are the final expression, the first of the other three can either be an orb or it can be a short vertical line that would be of length equal to the orb’s radius, if the orb wasn’t absent. However, if the initial shape is in fact an orb, then because the seventh shape of a period is also absent from the whole of the expression, then the orb can only be followed by the percentage notation represented by the three symbols conjunctively contemplated when used in conjunction with that notation. However, if the initial shape is in fact the short vertical line of length equal to the absent orb’s radius, then one or two other shapes can squeeze between the line representing one, and the percentage notion. One, but only one of the shapes can be a repetition of the initial short, vertical line, which would be a total of five geometric shapes. However, if the vertical line is followed by a single orb, then it may also be followed by a second orb, but no more than that. There can be no one hundred and ten percenters, nor can one give a thousand percent effort, sir.
Conclusion 1: No less and no more than six geometric shapes are required to represent the ALL of any particular thing, including the ALL itself when ALL is defined as a thing.
Conclusion 2: The doing that must be done is as endless as time, therefore a delineation that separates the ego-guided known from the unmanifested, wu-wei-guided unknown, is how the doing is done, making why dependent upon the known, and independent of the Unknown’s, how.
Conclusion 3: Although less is often known, more is often said, more or less.
Keyword: Six.
