Re: The Left Destroys EVERYTHING It Touches
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:03 pm
Who states things as facts, but then can't find any proof of them?
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Who states things as facts, but then can't find any proof of them?
That was a denial of the existence and activity of White Supremacists in the US. You deny facts, dude.
That was a denial that some aid programs have been successful in developing countries. You deny facts, dude.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:27 pm... "no country in the world has achieved substantial development based on reliance on aid." None. Nada. Zip. It's never worked.
I said, "Show me your facts." You could find four guys in costume.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:18 pmThat was a denial of the existence and activity of White Supremacists in the US. You deny facts, dude.
It was a quotation, actually, by somebody who actually knows. Go back and check.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:26 pmThat was a denial that some aid programs have been successful in developing countries. You deny facts, dude.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:27 pm... "no country in the world has achieved substantial development based on reliance on aid." None. Nada. Zip. It's never worked.
*can you offer any? no doubt, there are white supremacists (folks who believe whitey is superior) but do they shape culture or are they just hangin' out on the fringes, impotent? Folks like yourself claim racism is systemic and white privilege (white supremacy) is endemic, so -- obviously -- you believe them white debbils are shapin', directin', controllin' society, gov, the economies, culture...so: pony up the evidencemickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:18 pm**That was a denial of the existence and activity of White Supremacists in the US. You deny *facts, dude.
Er ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:26 pm So explain why four guys in costume represent "White Supremacy" as some sort of threat to the US.
Heck, no.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:39 pmEr ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:26 pm So explain why four guys in costume represent "White Supremacy" as some sort of threat to the US.
he's a mook (useful idiot)Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:47 pmHeck, no.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:39 pmEr ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:26 pm So explain why four guys in costume represent "White Supremacy" as some sort of threat to the US.
I'm just asking you to show what you've got, that gives you such confidence that "White Supremacy" even represents a threat. But you're talking and talking, but providing nothing...because, I suspect, you've got nothing. "White Supremacy" is just the Left's excuse for paranoia and their justification for totalitarianism. It has nothing to do with reality.
If, as so far, you've got nothing, then either you're incredibly credulous, or you are one of the people who's using the "White Supremacy" excuse for your agenda. I can't say which.
Maybe. But I find it implausible that anybody with a head on his shoulders actually thinks that the US's problem right now is "White Supremacy." It's just too stupid for belief.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:54 pmhe's a mook (useful idiot)Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:47 pmHeck, no.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:39 pm
Er ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?
I'm just asking you to show what you've got, that gives you such confidence that "White Supremacy" even represents a threat. But you're talking and talking, but providing nothing...because, I suspect, you've got nothing. "White Supremacy" is just the Left's excuse for paranoia and their justification for totalitarianism. It has nothing to do with reality.
If, as so far, you've got nothing, then either you're incredibly credulous, or you are one of the people who's using the "White Supremacy" excuse for your agenda. I can't say which.
meh...mooks are a dime a dozen...hollow people filled up with borrowed piss and vinegar...pawns...mouth pieces...garden-variety...boring...they dream of a seat on the politburo: they're usually the ones first lined up against the wallImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:09 pmMaybe. But I find it implausible that anybody with a head on his shoulders actually thinks that the US's problem right now is "White Supremacy." It's just too stupid for belief.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:54 pmhe's a mook (useful idiot)Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:47 pm
Heck, no.
I'm just asking you to show what you've got, that gives you such confidence that "White Supremacy" even represents a threat. But you're talking and talking, but providing nothing...because, I suspect, you've got nothing. "White Supremacy" is just the Left's excuse for paranoia and their justification for totalitarianism. It has nothing to do with reality.
If, as so far, you've got nothing, then either you're incredibly credulous, or you are one of the people who's using the "White Supremacy" excuse for your agenda. I can't say which.
In any case, for whatever purpose he has in mind, he certainly has committed to his strategy. Whether it's been handed to him by the ideologues above him, or adopted for some purpose of his own, I can't say. But he's having a remarkably hard time summoning the evidence for his claim, I must say.
Well, objectors like you and me probably go to the wall first, if they can get their hands on us. But as soon as we're gone, then we're no longer available as an excuse for the obvious failures of "the revolution." So that's when the powers in charge go looking for the mooks -- they're the next ones in line to take the blame, because they are alleged to be insufficiently committed, or maybe even covert counterrevolutionaries. They're the "Kulaks" of the first purge.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:18 pmmeh...mooks are a dime a dozen...hollow people filled up with borrowed piss and vinegar...pawns...mouth pieces...garden-variety...boring...they dream of a seat on the politburo: they're usually the ones first lined up against the wallImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:09 pmMaybe. But I find it implausible that anybody with a head on his shoulders actually thinks that the US's problem right now is "White Supremacy." It's just too stupid for belief.
In any case, for whatever purpose he has in mind, he certainly has committed to his strategy. Whether it's been handed to him by the ideologues above him, or adopted for some purpose of his own, I can't say. But he's having a remarkably hard time summoning the evidence for his claim, I must say.
*if'n they do, they'll never take me alive (I'll trade bullets with 'em, take some with me), but I won't ever wear the bracelets or even see the wall).Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:41 pmWell, objectors like you and me probably go to the wall first, *if they can get their hands on us. But as soon as we're gone, then we're no longer available as an excuse for the obvious failures of "the revolution." So that's when the powers in charge go looking for the mooks -- they're the next ones in line to take the blame, because they are alleged to be insufficiently committed, or maybe even covert counterrevolutionaries. **They're the "**Kulaks" of the first purge.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:18 pmmeh...mooks are a dime a dozen...hollow people filled up with borrowed piss and vinegar...pawns...mouth pieces...garden-variety...boring...they dream of a seat on the politburo: they're usually the ones first lined up against the wallImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:09 pm
Maybe. But I find it implausible that anybody with a head on his shoulders actually thinks that the US's problem right now is "White Supremacy." It's just too stupid for belief.
In any case, for whatever purpose he has in mind, he certainly has committed to his strategy. Whether it's been handed to him by the ideologues above him, or adopted for some purpose of his own, I can't say. But he's having a remarkably hard time summoning the evidence for his claim, I must say.
But yeah, the next bullet's for them. They're preparing their own execution, singing the songs of the revolution as they go.
Then it's high time you stopped prevaricating and clarified where you stand on the issue of the reality of White Supremacy in the US.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:47 pmHeck, no.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:39 pmEr ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:26 pm So explain why four guys in costume represent "White Supremacy" as some sort of threat to the US.
Silly. Leftist projection again.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:02 pmThen it's high time you stopped prevaricating...Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:47 pmHeck, no.mickthinks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:39 pm
Er ... are you trying to pass off "None of whom we can even locate" as an acceptance of White Supremacy's existence?