Page 33 of 39

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:44 am
by Typist
lancek4 wrote:AUK your observations a questions I agree with and are valid and pertinent. I think it shows an immature presumtuousnees for Typist to elude all querries to, basically, "you just don't really understand".
Thank you for joining the nonsense fantasy that's been repeated endlessly by the childlike inhabitants of these conversations.

Again, it's simply absolute rubbish to claim I've eluded queries, when the documented fact is I've typed about a billion words on this topic.

If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.

If it would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:59 pm
by Arising_uk
Typist wrote:...

If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.

If it would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.
Rather than satisfying your need for sadism and bondage, why not just tell people in a way that they might be able to understand what doing 'aphilosophy' involves?

The meaning of one's words is the response they produce - simples.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:37 pm
by lancek4
Typist wrote:
lancek4 wrote:AUK your observations a questions I agree with and are valid and pertinent. I think it shows an immature presumtuousnees for Typist to elude all querries to, basically, "you just don't really understand".
Thank you for joining the nonsense fantasy that's been repeated endlessly by the childlike inhabitants of these conversations.

Again, it's simply absolute rubbish to claim I've eluded queries, when the documented fact is I've typed about a billion words on this topic.

If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.
iwhat makes you think I havnt 'done aphilosophy'. ? I think you havnt read anything I've (maybe we) posted, or if you have then you are stuck in a presumptuouness that prevents you from acknowledging what anyone says

t would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:43 pm
by lancek4
Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:00 pm
by Mark Question
and thats not all! mindfulness is also hip in google, apple and facebook. cool.
http://www.mindfulnet.org/page9.htm
making more money with zen.
business is no more practiced like newest religious cults.

by the way, typist. do you use reasoning and words to tell yourself why on earth you should even try aphilosophy? do horny playboy go to monk monastery where the play is harder than god using viagra? give me a link if i asked old question.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:47 pm
by lancek4
Typist, Heres a simple question you can answer: What happens when one does aphilsophy?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:38 am
by chaz wyman
lancek4 wrote:Typist, Heres a simple question you can answer: What happens when one does aphilsophy?
:roll:

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:38 am
by chaz wyman
lancek4 wrote:Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.
Why indeed not??
:o

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:56 am
by lancek4
chaz wyman wrote:
lancek4 wrote:Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.
Why indeed not??
:o
Do you think Typist is trying to make an extremely profound statement through his aphilosophical practice of not responding to these questions? :lol:

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:38 am
by chaz wyman
lancek4 wrote:
chaz wyman wrote: :o
Do you think Typist is trying to make an extremely profound statement through his aphilosophical practice of not responding to these questions? :lol:
Priceless :D :D :D :D

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:05 pm
by lancek4
...wait.....................................ahhhhhhhh, I just practiced some aphilsophy. So good. ahhh Oh no, now im practicing philslophy, crap.... wait...........
So now to continue practicing aphilsophy while i communicate it, Im going to put all the aphilsophical stuff in parentheses. ok, here I go.......aaaahhhhhh (ok, so I am in a complete zen niravans state, and I am meeting with God now and I have found truth so you all should listen, since I am not practicing philsophy right now.
Truth is bro.. truth is that plant there, that tree. comtemplate the tree - wait but not philsophically. ok
how is the tree there different from your thoughts about the tree, and how is that different from when...) there is a tree. It is tall with a thin trunk and wide green leaves.

(ok, what is the difference?) .....ahhhhhh.. that was good. I hope you all understand now aphilosophy enough that you ngo practice it.

And then get back to me.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:48 am
by Typist
lancek4 wrote:Typist, Heres a simple question you can answer: What happens when one does aphilsophy?
Lancek4, here's a simple answer which I've already shared many times.

If you want to know, find out for yourself.

1) Go to Google
2) Search for "meditation"
3) Find some simple technique
4) Try it.

If you don't want to know, hit reply, and type some more gibberish in this thread.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:22 am
by evangelicalhumanist
Typist wrote:
lancek4 wrote:Typist, Heres a simple question you can answer: What happens when one does aphilsophy?
Lancek4, here's a simple answer which I've already shared many times.

If you want to know, find out for yourself.

1) Go to Google
2) Search for "meditation"
3) Find some simple technique
4) Try it.

If you don't want to know, hit reply, and type some more gibberish in this thread.
So, after a million and a half posts, aPhilosophy is just meditation.

Why, I wonder, does it need a separate name? And why didn't you just say so?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:39 am
by blackbox
evangelicalhumanist wrote:Why, I wonder, does it need a separate name? And why didn't you just say so?
Insatiable hunger?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:44 am
by chaz wyman
evangelicalhumanist wrote:
Typist wrote:
lancek4 wrote:Typist, Heres a simple question you can answer: What happens when one does aphilsophy?
Lancek4, here's a simple answer which I've already shared many times.

If you want to know, find out for yourself.

1) Go to Google
2) Search for "meditation"
3) Find some simple technique
4) Try it.

If you don't want to know, hit reply, and type some more gibberish in this thread.
So, after a million and a half posts, aPhilosophy is just meditation.

Why, I wonder, does it need a separate name? And why didn't you just say so?
don't think it's that either - how can you meditate without thinking?