Page 33 of 39

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 7:45 am
by Age
Magnus Anderson wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 5:45 am
Age wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 5:10 am If 'this' is what you continue to 'see', and/or really want to 'believe' is true, then 'this' is perfectly fine and okay, with me.
I can write a Commodore 64 program that simulates your mind. Your responses are THAT generic.
And, I will say, re-repeat once more, there is no thing that has 'your mind'. But, if you, really, do want to believe otherwise, and thus only 'see' and only 'hear' otherwise, then 'this' is perfectly fine and okay, with me.

See, what 'you' are doing, here, "magnus anderson" is continually providing irrefutable proof of how the One and only Mind, and of how the brain in conjunction with the 'belief-system' work, exactly.

In fact the very reason why some many of you older human beings have so much conflict, and confusion, within, is, exactly, because of how the Mind, and the brain, can work in exact opposition with each other.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 7:55 am
by Fairy
Magnus Anderson wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 3:53 am
Age wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 11:26 pm Thank you very much. I really do appreciate when people just answer my clarifying questions openly and honestly. It is very refreshing and again very much appreciated.
Nah, you enjoy it when they say, "I don't know". Had he honestly and openly stated an opinion you don't like, you would have welcomed him with a number of LOLs, you would have called his stance laughable, you would have addressed him with "this one" and "these human beings", you would have raised the stupidest objections against everything he has said and has not said, no matter how big or small, you would have accused him of being overly attached to his beliefs, of being deaf, blind, dishonest, a slow learner, etc. You're a poser through and through.
Nah, Age is a poster not a poser. A poster just like you.

Another poster is your mirror reflecting right Back atcha exactly what you are seeing in it. I know this because I have worked diligently on the nature of self and mind.

No one can know the content of another person’s mind. All knowledge comes from the one space in which all minds appear, disappear, and reappear. You are only talking about yourself. There’s no other self. There’s billions of impressions, but there’s only one knower, reader of those impressions.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:29 am
by Magnus Anderson
Fairy wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 7:43 am You’re welcome.
You should seriously consider learning how to mind your own business instead of constantly sticking your nose into matters that are obviously beyond your capacity to handle them.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:32 am
by Fairy
Magnus Anderson wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:29 am
Fairy wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 7:43 am You’re welcome.
You should seriously consider learning how to mind your own business instead of constantly sticking your nose into matters that are obviously beyond your capacity to handle them.
You should seriously consider stopping being rude and obnoxious to other posters. This is my thread topic and I will direct it in a way I think it should go. 😳

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:35 am
by Magnus Anderson
Fairy wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:32 am You should seriously consider stopping being rude and obnoxious to other posters. This is my thread topic and I will direct it in a way I think it should go. 😳
Perhaps you should try listening to your own advice.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 10:20 am
by Fairy
Magnus Anderson wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:35 am
Fairy wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 8:32 am You should seriously consider stopping being rude and obnoxious to other posters. This is my thread topic and I will direct it in a way I think it should go. 😳
Perhaps you should try listening to your own advice.
Pot Kettle Black

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 1:09 pm
by Gary Childress
Age wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 11:26 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 2:28 pm
Age wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 2:15 pm

So, if we were to cut open a human body, where is 'this place', which you call 'mind', exactly, where 'thoughts', themselves, occur and reside?

And, is the whole purpose of the 'mind' thingy to be 'just a place' where 'thoughts' occur and reside, only?
I don't know.
Thank you very much. I really do appreciate when people just answer my clarifying questions openly and honestly. It is very refreshing and again very much appreciated.
You're welcome.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2025 4:27 pm
by Walker
Age wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 11:30 pm
Would you agree that each type of life form is a support mechanism for the organic hardware that receives a particular frequency of the One Mind that is broadcasting on all frequencies?

If so, then each support-mechanism life form that cognizes reality does so within the frequency range of the receiver that is inherent to that type of life form.

Because many life forms exist, many different receivers exist, and this gives the illusion of many minds. Many minds are actually many receivers of one mind, receivers being the organic hardware, receiving on many different frequencies.

It would explain why two people in different places at different times think the same thought, which is why the Wright Brothers were in such a rush to fly.

All things considered, if unknown circumstances would cause the need to make a case for One Mind Only, do you suppose that you would make that one, considering all that you’ve learned about making cases?

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:37 am
by Age
Walker wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 4:27 pm
Age wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 11:30 pm
Would you agree that each type of life form is a support mechanism for the organic hardware that receives a particular frequency of the One Mind that is broadcasting on all frequencies?
At the moment I would not agree nor disagree.

I would have to first ask a series of clarifying questions to even just begin to come to understand what 'it' is, exactly, that you are asking, here.
Walker wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 4:27 pm If so, then each support-mechanism life form that cognizes reality does so within the frequency range of the receiver that is inherent to that type of life form.

Because many life forms exist, many different receivers exist, and this gives the illusion of many minds. Many minds are actually many receivers of one mind, receivers being the organic hardware, receiving on many different frequencies.

It would explain why two people in different places at different times think the same thought, which is why the Wright Brothers were in such a rush to fly.
I do not comprehend nor follow, here, how, nor why, the "wright" brothers were in such a rush to fly, exactly.
Walker wrote: Tue Sep 30, 2025 4:27 pm All things considered, if unknown circumstances would cause the need to make a case for One Mind Only, do you suppose that you would make that one, considering all that you’ve learned about making cases?
But, even if I did want to make 'a case', here, which I do not want to, I do not need to.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:06 pm
by Walker
Age wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:37 am I do not comprehend nor follow, here, how, nor why, the "wright" brothers were in such a rush to fly, exactly.
The way I figure it, the bros wanted to be the first humans in the history of the world to fly, and not merely float around under a balloon like just another pretty cloud. They probably also yearned for more than the daily grind of making and repairing bicycles.

Their ambition that generated the energy and creativity for them to pull human flight from potentiality and into objective manifestation had the side effect of them also dreaming of more than a guaranteed hovel, bed and bowl of gruel for everyone.

Since they were smart enough to be the first humans to figure out how to fly, which made them the foremost authorities in the world, they were also smart enough to suspect that perks and benefits would be waiting back there on two-dimensional earth for the discoverers who had gone where no one had gone before, thus creating a Turning Point for Mankind, because they also figured out how to land.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:45 pm
by Walker
Age wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:37 am But, even if I did want to make 'a case', here, which I do not want to, I do not need to.
Well, it is a method of clarifying upon request.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:09 pm
by Age
Walker wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:45 pm
Age wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:37 am But, even if I did want to make 'a case', here, which I do not want to, I do not need to.
Well, it is a method of clarifying upon request.
When you say and write the word, 'it', here, what is 'the method' you are referring to, exactly?

If is is 'the need', itself, then yes I would make 'the case. After all I will be making 'the case' anyway.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2025 1:12 am
by Age
Walker wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:06 pm
Age wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:37 am I do not comprehend nor follow, here, how, nor why, the "wright" brothers were in such a rush to fly, exactly.
The way I figure it, the bros wanted to be the first humans in the history of the world to fly, and not merely float around under a balloon like just another pretty cloud. They probably also yearned for more than the daily grind of making and repairing bicycles.

Their ambition that generated the energy and creativity for them to pull human flight from potentiality and into objective manifestation had the side effect of them also dreaming of more than a guaranteed hovel, bed and bowl of gruel for everyone.

Since they were smart enough to be the first humans to figure out how to fly, which made them the foremost authorities in the world, they were also smart enough to suspect that perks and benefits would be waiting back here on two-dimensional earth for the discoverers who had gone where no one had gone before, thus creating a Turning Point for Mankind, because they also figured out how to land.
So, is what you are saying and claiming, here, is that those brothers did what they did, that is, just create, fly, and land a plane because they were greedy, selfish, wanted to be the first or for fame, and/or to just do some thing different?

If yes, then I am not sure how 'these reasons' prove what you were 'trying to' get at, which was, human beings can come up with similar ideas and/or have similar thoughts and thinking, more or less at the same moments, although they are on different parts of the world', in the day and age without having near instant actual communication with each other, correct?

The very Fact that people have done 'this' previously, and even in the days when this is being written people can, still, be seen to have not just similar thinking, but more or less the exact same thinking and coming up with more or less the exact same ideas at about the exact same day and age, is just solid evidence for your claim anyway.

Even in the days when this is being people and when people are 'trying' so hard to keep 'those thoughts and ideas' a secret, for the exact same reason that they want fame and monetary fortune, and to just do some thing new or different, what can be clearly seen is people from different parts of earth come up with similar ideas, although they have not had contact with each other.

This unity of ideas arising at about roughly the exact same times throughout human history, and happening more so as human beings evolve, is because of not just what you have been alluding to, here, which is, all 'life form', or 'receivers' are 'tuned into' One (and only) Mind that exists, but also because of the increasing speed of sharing information, and because of the increasing rate of access to this shared information and knowledge, around the world.

The sole reason, however, why some people can be and are 'years ahead' of others is not because any one is more intelligent than another is, but is because some are 'aligned' with what you might call the 'right frequency' and thus are more 'attuned' with the One Mind, Itself, and do not 'look' nor 'listen' from the already obtained information and knowledge that gets passed on as being 'believed' to be what is true and/or right.

Those who 'look' and 'listen' from the Truly open Mind's perspective, first, are the ones who come up with imagining those, relatively, new ideas and views, and/or who bring and create 'new ideas' come to fruition. That is, 'they' make 'potentiality', 'reality', or what you might call, 'objective manifestation'.

Now, the 'potential' to make and create absolutely any thing is only possible in an infinite and eternal Universe.
The Universe is infinite and eternal.
Therefore, the potential to 'dream up', or imagine, and/or to come up with the design and plan that will create a Truly peaceful world for every one together, as One, is also possible. And, whoever does this is not because they are more intelligent than absolutely any one, but because of how absolutely every one came to dream up, or imagine, some relatively new thing and then just did whatever it took to make 'that dream' and 'potentiality' an 'actuality' came to 'achieve' what they did. That is, just 'look' and 'listen' from the Truly open perspective, first, and only, and then only then use 'past experiences' to 'make' what 'potentially could happen' into 'reality', itself.

Now, although 'dreaming of more than a guaranteed hovel, bed and bowl of gruel for some' may well lead to newer and better ideas and inventions, when imagining, dreaming up, inventing, designing, planning, making, and creating is not for the betterment and good of every one, as One, then human beings full potential is not reached nor achieved. The reason some people's ideas and inventions are way 'too far ahead' for some people, or for human beings collective, at particular points in history is because they were using full potential, itself, on 'their ideas' and not concerned at all about 'monetary nor selfish gains'. 'These human beings' although may well 'die' alone, and monetary broke, but they 'die' knowing that what they were doing was for the betterment and good of every one, and not just for some only. Their lives were not the direct cause of absolutely any of the greed, conflict, and warring, in the world, which is what is leading to human beings collective ending, or 'death'.

Being so-called 'smart enough' to suspect that perks and benefits would be waiting for one, or some, when behind ones ideas and planning in creating things is why 'the world' is the absolute 'mess' that it is 'currently' in, when this is being written. Those brothers, and those like them, did not create an actual so-called 'Turning Point for Mankind'. What people like them have done is just create a faster downhill spiral to humanity's demise. Since you human beings first 'took' what you knew was Wrong, in Life, 'try to' blame something else for your own Wrong doings, and are continually wanting to do for a select few only, for selfish and greedy purposes, you human beings are not being 'smart' at all, let alone being so-called 'smart enough'. What you call, 'smart enough', in relation to considering or dreaming of 'the perks and benefits' one could or would receive, is why the collapse of humanity and of their one and only home has just about spiralled out of complete control.

In the days when this is being written you adult human beings select, and then elect, not just some of the most 'non smartest' people in the world, to so-call 'lead' you, but also some of the most greediest, selfish, and most hateful people, in the world. Which is, obviously, not 'smart enough' at all.

If any ambition, which is needed to generate the energy and creativity to pull any 'new idea' from potentiality and into objective manifestation, ends up having absolutely side effect of some gaining 'more' than others 'do', then 'that ambition' was just completely lost and wasted to the detriment of all. Any idea, creation, or invention at all, where some people can have ownership of them, which those people can then, in turn, use those things to then have power and control over other people, is not a 'turning point in humankind' but is just a continual path towards all of their demise.

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:07 am
by Walker
Age wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 1:12 am
So, is what you are saying and claiming, here, is that those brothers did what they did, that is, just create, fly, and land a plane because they were greedy, selfish, wanted to be the first or for fame, and/or to just do some thing different?

If yes ...
No. It would be rather presumptuous to place such limitations upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight (which excludes the flight of falling off a cliff).

In the future history of the world I'll maybe get around to reading what you wrote after your assumption of "yes" placed limitations upon your own understanding of those who first transcended gravity.

:D

Re: Questions to Age

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:50 am
by Age
Walker wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:07 am
Age wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 1:12 am
So, is what you are saying and claiming, here, is that those brothers did what they did, that is, just create, fly, and land a plane because they were greedy, selfish, wanted to be the first or for fame, and/or to just do some thing different?

If yes ...
No. It would be rather presumptuous to place such limitations upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight (which excludes the flight of falling off a cliff).

In the future history of the world I'll maybe get around to reading what you wrote after your assumption of "yes" placed limitations upon your own understanding of those who first transcended gravity.

:D
Well then you will never understand how and why what you called 'smart enough' to regards to what they suspected is the very reason why humankind is on a downhill spiral to their demise.

LOL And, what, supposedly, is my own understanding of just those human beings who, maybe, first what you call 'transcended gravity?'

What else is there to understand, here, other than that they may have been 'the first'?

The other things that you were talking about and were alluding to were only providing more proof of how and why you human beings can be 'too stupid enough' to recognize the actual Wrong that you are doing, which is causing your own demise.