Something to pay attention to [here I address the multitude of readers, hundreds if not thousands, who carefully read what I write

] an interesting dynamic here: Walker will not and cannot listen to
any point that I make, and can only continue with his points that have a cartoonesque lack of dimension.
What seems to happen is that the more dimensionality that one can entertain -- here I speak only for myself -- the harder it is to take any
specific side.
But here, and again for the sake of expanding the dimension of our thoughts about and our consideration of this immense issue, with so many levels of import and problematic relevance, I submit this interesting piece by
Noam Chomsky.
What interests me is to
contrast Chomsky's view -- a powerful and also a coherent Left-ideological position, indeed even revolutionary, which demonstrates how capable it is of influencing the *idealistic young* -- with the expressed view of
Jonathan Bowden.
It is a strange issue to meditate over and, of course, to decide on which side one chooses for one's own complicit allegiance.
America is a colonizer/settler nation as Chomsky states. Obviously this is standard Left-Progressive material and great emphasis is placed on the crimes of America that are deeply tied up with its existence. And he compares Israel's colonizing and settler movement with that of our own colonizing and settling nations: the US, Canada, NZ, Australia: all off-shoots (and continuations, extensions) of English imperialism.
So once you go down that road -- the road of recognizing guilt, blame and complicity -- you undermine your own existence at the most basic level.
Curiously, the ideology or the *moral manoeuvre* that Bowden offers is to deconstruct and dismantle what he calls 'the grammar of self-intolerance'. It is an ideological platform of interpretation, obviously grounded in a Marxian analysis, but also one that could well be Christian, with which the individual undermines his own being, his accomplishment, his power.
Now, I
could and any one of us
could take the Straussian/Machiavellian Jewish-Zionist position that the only thing that really matters is a people and its existence, and that a cultural or religious mythology is really only something for the consumption of the masses who must have such in order to validate themselves (or not to invalidate themselves, which is deadly), and I
could say that no matter what, and even against all moral opposition,
Am Chai Yisrael. And I could, if I were to get really sober and cynical in that Machiavellian sense, conclude and decide that the troublesome population of Palestine, now again Israel,
needs to be eliminated.
I submit a video that points to something few are considering: Gaza is one thing, but it is
the West Bank that is actually the thing to be fought over.
What if I abandon all the false pretenses of a type of moralism and decide that the only thing that really matters is the power-dynamic and what power attains and maintains for itself? I might
then agree to support the Jews and Israelis in their *project* and not to care if tens of thousands, millions, are wiped out. It certainly is not the first time even in recent history that millions have died. Who cares?
Here is a short video tracing the grief of an Israeli woman who lost her husband in the recent attack. I will bet anything that all the people who participate on this forum have much more in common with her, and lives and backgrounds that are more commensurate, than with most Palestinian Arabs.