Einstein on the train

[Logik]

But I have communicated it ALREADY.

Point us to the post where you BELIEVE you communicated it.

[Age]

But I have NEVER refused to communicate with you.

Well, 6 posts later I am still waiting for you to communicate what "evidence" is.

Your continued avoidance of tackling the issue directly means "refusal to communicate" to me.

Oh is that all you want to KNOW. You must of failed to communicate it to me. If I FAILED to receive the communication, which you sent me, then that means that it MUST BE on MY PART and so MY FAULT ONLY, and therefore I have to learn how to receive communication BETTER.

But anyway, to me, 'evidence' is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

[Logik]

But anyway, to me, 'evidence' is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Can you define "facts" and "information" ?
Also "proposition"
And "true"
And "valid".

So many strange words.

[uwot]

The only thing we know for certain is that there is some weird shit going on.

Well that is one way to "cover up" proposing things as being True, but in Truth REALLY NOT knowing what IS going on.

Why do you think the book is called 'Einstein on the train and other stories'?

[Age]

But I have communicated it ALREADY.

Point us to the post where you BELIEVE you communicated it.

On the page before this one and not to many posts back where you said that you still had NO IDEA what I mean, AND where I wrote, which is underlined now for you:

If you still have no idea what I mean by the word 'evidence', then I will give you an example of what I mean by 'evidence'. If you STILL have NO IDEA what I mean by 'evidence', AFTER THAT, then just let me know and I will find a way so you CAN and WILL understand. You asked me if you were getting beyond ridiculous. I said, Yes, as evidenced below.

Because you have a very strong tendency to MISS what I write, or just NOT read the actual words that I write, so I will repeat them for you. Just to make it clear for you now, because you are very slow in understanding, an example of what evidence means to me is, in regards to you getting beyond ridiculous is:

You KEEP asking me why I BELIEVE things, when I have CLEARLY INFORMED YOU, on COUNTLESS OCCASIONS NOW, that I neither BELIEVE nor DISBELIEVE things. Now, you, ASKING ME questions regarding what I BELIEVE, is EVIDENCE (for when I said, Yes you are getting beyond ridiculous now).

Do you STILL have NO IDEA what 'evidence' means, to me?

[Logik]

On the page before this one and not to many posts back where you said that you still had NO IDEA what I mean, AND where I wrote, which is underlined now for you:

If you still have no idea what I mean by the word 'evidence', then I will give you an example of what I mean by 'evidence'. If you STILL have NO IDEA what I mean by 'evidence', AFTER THAT, then just let me know and I will find a way so you CAN and WILL understand. You asked me if you were getting beyond ridiculous. I said, Yes, as evidenced below.

Because you have a very strong tendency to MISS what I write, or just NOT read the actual words that I write, so I will repeat them for you. Just to make it clear for you now, because you are very slow in understanding, an example of what evidence means to me is, in regards to you getting beyond ridiculous is:

You KEEP asking me why I BELIEVE things, when I have CLEARLY INFORMED YOU, on COUNTLESS OCCASIONS NOW, that I neither BELIEVE nor DISBELIEVE things. Now, you, ASKING ME questions regarding what I BELIEVE, is EVIDENCE (for when I said, Yes you are getting beyond ridiculous now).

Do you STILL have NO IDEA what 'evidence' means, to me?

Yeah. You said you were going to give me an example.

And then you didn't.

[Age]

The only thing we know for certain is that there is some weird shit going on.

Well that is one way to "cover up" proposing things as being True, but in Truth REALLY NOT knowing what IS going on.

Why do you think the book is called 'Einstein on the train and other stories'?

Because it relates to einstein and the stories that you human beings make up on what you call 'facts'. But which, unfortunately, some people interpret them wrong and make up stories, which they express as though they are facts, themselves, or thee truth. For example, 'the Universe is expanding' is ONLY a MADE UP story, but some times it gets expressed as though it is true and a fact, which other people then accept and spread it on as though it is now True and a Real fact.

WHY do you persist in NOT answering my clarifying questions?

You asked for feedback and comments on your book. I have informed you that there are writings in there that contradict themselves, but you seem to NOT want to LOOK AT this at all.

Also, some people propose things in particular ways, like for example, that they are facts, but when questioned about how they NOT facts really, then they say but they are just stories. But you would ALREADY KNOW about this, correct?

[Age]

But anyway, to me, 'evidence' is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Can you define "facts" and "information" ?
Also "proposition"
And "true"
And "valid".

Yes
Yes
Yes, and
Yes

So many strange words.

What do you mean by 'strange'?

And, how could a word be 'strange'?

[Logik]

Can you define "facts" and "information" ?
Also "proposition"
And "true"
And "valid".

Yes
Yes
Yes, and
Yes

Do it then.

[Age]

On the page before this one and not to many posts back where you said that you still had NO IDEA what I mean, AND where I wrote, which is underlined now for you:

If you still have no idea what I mean by the word 'evidence', then I will give you an example of what I mean by 'evidence'. If you STILL have NO IDEA what I mean by 'evidence', AFTER THAT, then just let me know and I will find a way so you CAN and WILL understand. You asked me if you were getting beyond ridiculous. I said, Yes, as evidenced below.

Because you have a very strong tendency to MISS what I write, or just NOT read the actual words that I write, so I will repeat them for you. Just to make it clear for you now, because you are very slow in understanding, an example of what evidence means to me is, in regards to you getting beyond ridiculous is:

You KEEP asking me why I BELIEVE things, when I have CLEARLY INFORMED YOU, on COUNTLESS OCCASIONS NOW, that I neither BELIEVE nor DISBELIEVE things. Now, you, ASKING ME questions regarding what I BELIEVE, is EVIDENCE (for when I said, Yes you are getting beyond ridiculous now).

Do you STILL have NO IDEA what 'evidence' means, to me?

Yeah. You said you were going to give me an example.

And then you didn't.

Obviously you MISSED it again or you did NOT read AGAIN. But as I said you do this quite often.

But it is NOT necessary now because I ALREADY defined the word 'evidence' for you, which you DID see this time. But just to make it clear anyway, an example of what 'evidence' means is when I say; 'You are getting beyond ridiculous now' in order to back up that this IS True I would NEED to PROVIDE some supporting 'evidence' or documentation for this ACCUSATION. That 'evidence' was PROVIDED when you ask questions like; 'Why do I BELIEVE things', that in conjunction with me ALREADY INFORMING YOU; 'I do NOT believe things' is what can be called 'evidence' or 'support' for MY ACCUSATION that 'You are getting beyond ridiculous now'. The amount of times for you to COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND some thing as so SIMPLE as this IS 'getting beyond ridiculous'.

So, I have defined what the word 'evidence' is for you. I have provided examples of what 'evidence' is, for you. I have explained what 'evidence' is for you. Now, hopefully, you are little bit more closer knowing what 'evidence' is for me.

But we will have to wait and see.

[Logik]

Obviously you MISSED it again or you did NOT read AGAIN. But as I said you do this quite often.

But it is NOT necessary now because I ALREADY defined the word 'evidence' for you

At this point it's clear to the readers that Age is a fucking liar.

[Atla]

The True Self KNOWS what thee Truth of things IS ALREADY, OBVIOUSLY.

What makes you think that the True Self knows anything?

[Age]

Can you define "facts" and "information" ?
Also "proposition"
And "true"
And "valid".

Yes
Yes
Yes, and
Yes

Do it then.

But these words do NOT "need" defining, AND

I asked you: How long are you going to ask me to define words for?
You stated: Till you get to a word that doesn't need to be defined.
And I stated: But there is NO word that "NEEDS" to be defined. So, you will stop now, that is; if you are honest person.

Now,
IF you are an honest person, then you will stop asking me to define words. But,
If you do keep asking me to define words, then you are a dishonest person.

[Logik]

But these words do NOT "need" defining

WE are communicating.
YOU are using words I do not understand.

Communicate their meaning to me.

IF you are an honest person, then you will stop asking me to define words. But,
If you do keep asking me to define words, then you are a dishonest person.

I don't know what you mean by "honest" and "dishonest". I just don't understand what you are saying to me - so I am asking.

[Age]

Obviously you MISSED it again or you did NOT read AGAIN. But as I said you do this quite often.

But it is NOT necessary now because I ALREADY defined the word 'evidence' for you

At this point it's clear to the readers that Age is a fucking liar.

BUT some of the readers ALREADY KNOW that I have ALREADY defined the word 'evidence' for you. The 'evidence' for this is can be CLEARLY SEEN when I wrote:

But anyway, to me, 'evidence' is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

You HAVE ALREADY RESPONDED to this so you, yourself, ALREADY KNOW that I have ALREADY defined the word 'evidence' FOR YOU. So, WHY you ACCUSE me of being a "fucking liar" for, some readers would be wondering, right NOW.