I find him … entertaining.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:18 amAs far as Harbal, I think he's got a good nose. I like him.
Can’t speak for his nose.
I find him … entertaining.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:18 amAs far as Harbal, I think he's got a good nose. I like him.
- The factual changes you note are quite apparent. They're overt, and covert. They are in degrees of obviousness.
I lean toward Indoctrination. In the 1950s and 60s, Western products and consumer goods were primarily marketed upon the premise of the product alone, meaning, that Ad men wanted to sell you a refrigerator that was better than other refrigerators. However, Ad men quickly realized that they were not only selling a product, but an "Image". This "Image" became the ideal 1950s Middle Class Caricature that appeals to the Make America Great Again! political movement—which is an appeal for Westerners to 'return' to that post-war victorious, positive, hopeful feeling.
....into this, clip you provided, and more.Walker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:29 amThis 30 second TV commercial is brilliant. It's endearing, and it persists.
It achieves the goals of advertising, and fits within the FSK of the OP, although mildly *.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbhCFM2K9ms
* Stepping outside the social engineering angle and into capitalism ...
Generous interpretation:
In a dollars and cents motivated effort to broaden their base, the advertiser paid for a setting and characters that are obviously one step removed from the stereotypical, liberal, white-girl college-girl lesbian phase of identity curiosity and exploration. It’s the post college bohemian stage for most non-STEM graduates, but that’s the fragmented life of many of today’s yutes who have money to spend, and there are quite a few of them scraping by for their necessities of electronic communication.
No, you're haughty!Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:48 amWhoops! DOn't let your haughty prejudice show.Walker wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:21 am- Are you really in the position to turn your nose up at other viewpoints?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:12 am
How ironic. The tribalist accusing others of "selfishness."
- If so, you're not all the things you say you are.
- You're just ... haughty.
- That's a characteristic stereotypically associated with Brits, at least in olden times.
It's not like you are not the queen of turning your own nose up at other people!
- Then the marketing of the products and services could only succeed because they are affirmations of very early indoctrination.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:04 am I believe that it is no longer about the products or services offered, but mostly about the Indoctrination, Propaganda, and Cultural Marxism perpetrated through these Commercial advertisements and coded messages, to the masses. It is indeed, intentionally subliminal, so that the Religious-Left, like those hooked on these messages (Dpants, Scalpy, Hairball, Etc.) "think nothing of them". They don't see the intent of the subliminal messages, aimed at the Western audience's subconsciousness.
That's correct; the Religious-Left know that their dwindling political power is entirely dependent on maintaining control of Propaganda and Indoctrination through Mass Media. This is why they fear Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter/X. This is why they fear Trump and MAGA-Republican-Conservatives. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, it's about the Religious-Left's irrational fear of Nazi Germany and Hitler, that they fear the rise of a Fascist Dictator if Culture shifts back toward the Right, concerning control of Western Propaganda as a whole.Walker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:23 am- Then the marketing of the products and services could only succeed because they are affirmations of very early indoctrination.
- That explains the ostensible nature of the government helping hand, as in, free pre-K through 12. And now, thanks to loan forgiveness, free under-graduate and post-graduate.
- It also explains why all this crap is coming to a head at this time in the history of the world. It's the evolution, the ripening of causes that have proceeded to react as an inevitable effect.
I would not know about molesting child. How did you find it? Have you been arrested yet?
... its' growing as even the most stupid dipshits figure out Trump is a criminal.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:34 amThat's correct; the Religious-Left know that their dwindling political power is ....Walker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:23 am- Then the marketing of the products and services could only succeed because they are affirmations of very early indoctrination.
- That explains the ostensible nature of the government helping hand, as in, free pre-K through 12. And now, thanks to loan forgiveness, free under-graduate and post-graduate.
- It also explains why all this crap is coming to a head at this time in the history of the world. It's the evolution, the ripening of causes that have proceeded to react as an inevitable effect.
I still don't see masturbation as a serious issue. I mean, I don't do it very often. It's something that many, MANY people do on occasion. Are you suggesting that no one ever masturbate? Or is it something you just rather not talk about? If it's the latter, that's fine. I don't mention it very often. However, I'll try not to mention it anymore from here forward if it upsets you.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:35 pm It’s kind of odd really — I mean when you think about it:
One thrusts his perverse & detailed pictures of his phantasy of the sodomizing of children.
The other presents his masturbation fixation as something to explain and defend (resisting restraint and the philosophical-hygienic practice of abstinence and re-channeling).
While a third explains and defends transvestism and who can guess what else.
What is going on here?
I believe the point being made is that trans people are probably no more likely to sodomize children than anyone else, perhaps even less likely statistically. I mean Catholic priests aren't setting a very good example on behalf of religion. Yet, it seems to be a continuous problem.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:35 pm
One thrusts his perverse & detailed pictures of his phantasy of the sodomizing of children.
I referred to Flash’s elaborate projected phantasy.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:50 pmI believe the point being made is that trans people are probably no more likely to sodomize children than anyone else, perhaps even less likely statistically. I mean Catholic priests aren't setting a very good example on behalf of religion. Yet, it seems to be a continuous problem.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:35 pm
One thrusts his perverse & detailed pictures of his phantasy of the sodomizing of children.
We are talking about the general topic of sexual ethics and a movement toward extreme forms of sexual libertinism in contrast with a developed philosophy (Platonic, Christian) that defines why restraint is necessary and a higher, more ethical choice.
If you were an actual Christian you could base that claim of superiority on God's word, or some knowledge passed on by God, but you aren't an actual Christian. If you were a real Platonist, you could base that claim of superiority on an eternal realm available to the right sort of inquiry, but you aren't a Platonist. You are a pissant and you base that claim to superirority on nothing but your devout concern for your own inner mental states and how important you feel after reviewing those states. Which is just pathetic.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:45 pmWe are talking about the general topic of sexual ethics and a movement toward extreme forms of sexual libertinism in contrast with a developed philosophy (Platonic, Christian) that defines why restraint is necessary and a higher, more ethical choice.
I refer to a sodomite, a masturbator, and a transvestite because it demonstrates a relationship to perversions-made-normal.
Gary, can you fucking READ??