Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:32 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:21 am
Did I?
If yes, then will you provide a link to that?
If no, then WHY NOT?
There, I just gave you a reprint. Scroll up.
But you will NOT provide a link or an EXACT POSITION.
I could say the answers to ALL of your clarifying questions is above. Just scroll up. But does that REALLY help ANY one, correct?
Okay Ken, some of your stupidity must be play acting right? I posted the exact thing you asked for as one post, and then referenced it in the bext post with advice to scroll up to the post above. This Shit can't be beyond you.
So THE EXACT POSITION is "two posts above this one" because you happened to have written a reply to somebody else between my two posts, that's where I answered your question in very precise and true terms.
If you need a link, may I point you to the little blue up arrows besides our names in these things. Those are the links to the places that the quotes come from.
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:32 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:21 am
I REALLY WISH you would STOP making up ASSUMPTIONS, which I then have to spend absolutely UNNECESSARY time CORRECTING.
I have NEVER " pretended that I do NOT know about 'it' ". I just asked you to PROVIDE the ACTUAL WORDS that I have used. Was that REALLY that hard to do?
Do you REMEMBER EVERY word that you have written, in the past?
Mate, I have posted your future generations text about 20 times in big colourful letters. And.... you have clarified nothing. So, are you about to clarify anything....?
Well what can be CLEARLY SEEN, in the original text and context that it was written, now that you have provided it, is the ACTUAL CLARITY that you are so DESPERATELY SEEKING and WANTING from me.
I have been requesting clarification on teh simple matter of whether you are predicting that persons in the yeart 2100 will be visiting this forum to learn about your grand wisdom. Or will it be persons in the year 3500 who do so? That is not at all clear.
I am looking for clarity over whether you are issuing the sort of god-chanelling vision FROM the future as Atla suspects, or are just telling us what you BELIEVE will be the case in the future. There is no clarification to be had from you in this matter.
It's not natural for me to spend this much time on your words Ken, you aren't interesting so it bores me to bother doing this stuff. And you aren't important, so it doesn't need doing. I'm doing this only because you are an obnoxious spam monkey who keeps taking over threads about other subjects to talk about himself. Talk of what I 'desperately need' or 'want' from you is misplaced, I would be happy for there to be a little bit less of you, because what there is, is textureless and lacks variety. You are human spinach, and I would like a smaller portion please.
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:32 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:21 am
Considering that you have provided my ACTUAL WORDS, we now have some thing to LOOK AT and SEE, and what can be CLEARLY SEEN is that they were written nearly five years ago. So, did you REALLY expect me to KNOW about them, WORD FOR WORD?
Also, what LOOKS LIKE, to you, is NOT necessarily what WAS MEANT, by me. Because some thing LOOKS LIKE a 'belief', TO YOU, this does NOT mean that 'it' is a 'belief'. Is this FINALLY CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD, completely?
Now, let us LOOK AT what I wrote, back then.
Now, you want, or are EXPECTING, me to tell you what I was predicting, and for whom, correct?
Well the answer to BOTH of those questions can be CLEARLY SEEN in that 'full unabridged text from my original claim', which you have thankfully provided here for us to LOOK AT and SEE.
And, I must say this is going even BETTER than I expected. So, thank you "flashdangerpants", for bringing this to the forefront, AGAIN.
Oh, and by the way, you made the claim here:
Here, again, is the full unabridged text from your original claim.
So, will you now provide a link to where, exactly, this 'full unabridged text' was presented, previously, as well?
.... no. Still clarifying nothing at all.
WHEN do these future generations fully understand you Ken?
It is NOT about, and NEVER was, about "understanding ANY 'me', referred to ANY name like "ken" nor "age".
Yeah, well you, Age/Ken are the person who often tells us that he has answered all clarifying questions put to him, but not received answers for those he has asked. So if you have been intending that as an impossible riddle, that's a bit of a dick move Ken.
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
Future generations will FULLY understand thee 'I', of which there is ONLY One. You KNOW that 'I', which hitherto the days when this was being, 'you', human beings, STILL did NOT YET KNOW the, proper and correct, answer to the question, 'Who am 'I'?', correct?
We know the answer to "who am I". You have your own, unecessary, Kenglish version of that in a language none of us speaks. And you have an unshakeable belief that future generations will understand that question in Kenglish rather than English.
But we remain no closer to an explanation of how you know that future generations will adopt this quite inexplicable need for "I" to refer to the universe when some new word would be a more sane way to get there. You apparently have some reason for using "Theee" instead of 'the'', why not Iiii instead of 'I'?
How do you know future generations wil adopt your particular choice of language conventions?
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
When future generations will FULLY UNDERSTOOD is when they learn how to become Truly Honest and Truly OPEN, like 'you' ALL once were.
Explaining this to a species, and a generation, who are Truly CLOSED and Truly Dishonest, just takes some time. But, as I keep REMINDING you, there is NO RUSH. As ALL works out PERFECTLY, ANYWAY.
Yeah, you're a bit too evasive and bullshitty to be accusing me of dishonesty if I am to be completely honest with you Ken.
And right now, what we have here is more evasion. The useful answer to "when will X happen?" is not "it will happen when it happens".
What is at question here is the nature of your prophecy. If it is not a matter of your personal belief, what is it?
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:06 am
'future generations', are the ones who come AFTER the one, in the days when this is being written.
Because what is to become just, 'common knowledge', is IRREFUTABLE, and which has ALREADY being PROVEN True throughout this thread and throughout human history.
No, how do you actually know Ken? Drop the mysticism act and tell us the truth.