Page 4 of 4

Re: what about Ether?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:08 pm
by Cerveny
John wrote: From General relativity in the global positioning system, University of Colorado:
Apart possibly from high-energy accelerators, there are no other engineering systems in existence today in which both special and general relativity have so many applications.
I tried to browse similar calculation two years ago and I did not find any real usage of GR. Perhaps some Lorentz equation was transformed into polar axes. Maybe you can give me the link to the exact calculation (not 15 years old nice tale). I would very appreciate it. I am always amused when someone uses GR for calculation with 10^-11 precision and the other is not able to calculate (in GR frame) "dark matter" gravity with precision of range 1^+1 (1000000000000 times smaller)

The dark matter problem is not problem of some new particles it is the problem of understanding of gravitation at all. It is time to suppose the GR fails :(

Re: what about Ether?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:50 pm
by i blame blame
Cerveny wrote:
I tried to browse similar calculation two years ago and I did not find any real usage of GR. Perhaps some Lorentz equation was transformed into polar axes. Maybe you can give me the link to the exact calculation (not 15 years old nice tale). I would very appreciate it. I am always amused when someone uses GR for calculation with 10^-11 precision and the other is not able to calculate (in GR frame) "dark matter" gravity with precision of range 1^+1 (1000000000000 times smaller)

The dark matter problem is not problem of some new particles it is the problem of understanding of gravitation at all. It is time to suppose the GR fails :(
Thar you go:
http://www.emis.ams.org/journals/LRG/Ar ... 03-1BW.pdf

Re: what about Ether?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:10 pm
by Cerveny
i blame blame wrote:
Cerveny wrote:
I tried to browse similar calculation two years ago and I did not find any real usage of GR. Perhaps some Lorentz equation was transformed into polar axes. Maybe you can give me the link to the exact calculation (not 15 years old nice tale). I would very appreciate it. I am always amused when someone uses GR for calculation with 10^-11 precision and the other is not able to calculate (in GR frame) "dark matter" gravity with precision of range 1^+1 (1000000000000 times smaller)

The dark matter problem is not problem of some new particles it is the problem of understanding of gravitation at all. It is time to suppose the GR fails :(
Thar you go:
http://www.emis.ams.org/journals/LRG/Ar ... 03-1BW.pdf
Thank you very much. But I am afraid I have already read it and there is (except some STR effects that are omitted at the end) no General relativity... But let me to browse it again...

Re: what about Ether?

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:33 pm
by Izzywizzy
Russellian Science pt 4 Space vs Ether

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=702yrRAz ... D589DDC7FB

Einstein Relativity theory declares aether necessary!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH9vAIdM ... 59F20068AA