LuckyR wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 6:29 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 5:26 pm
LuckyR wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 4:36 pm
Your commentary is correct as stated, however your unstated implication (that "moral rights" are somehow not subjective, in contrast with human made-up laws, is your error, if true).
Well considering that 'it' is absolutely not True, at all, your inferred and presumed so-claimed and so-called 'unstated implication', here, is completely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.
So, although I will thank you for acknowledging that my comment, there, is correct, your continual pre-assuming things, here, is, still, letting 'you: down, somewhat.
Just to be absolutely clear I do not consider 'moral rights' are somehow not subjective, in contrast with any thing, which obviously includes your human beings made up laws.
Then we're in agreement. Yay. As an aside, it is common and routine in this sort of information exchange for folks to imply ideas, leaving the reader to verify if such things are true. No harm, no foul.
To verify is one thing. To infer, only, is another.
By the way, what do you think is the best, most conducive, most productive, and the most simplest and easiest way 'to veriify'?
To 'just infer/assume', then respond, or not, from what is, essentially, just a guess, which obviously could be Right, Wrong, or partly right and wrong, or to 'just ask an open question' while seeking verification and/or clarity, instead?
Which way do you think would would be quicker in leading to finding, and/or producing, 'agreement', itself?
How much 'time' and/or 'effort' could be 'saved' in discussions if people sought out actual clarification/verification, first, before they presumed/inferred absolutely any thing at all.
Now, of course, the writer/speaker implies things, but the reader/listener does not 'have to' infer/assume things.
In places like a 'philosophy forum' the latter has the ability and thus could, obviously just ask questions, for clarification and verification sake.
Unlike in 'days long gone' where is was near impossible to seek out and obtain clarity, in 'the days when this is being written', you human beings have 'the advantage' to speak to 'writers', 'directly', and ask them things like, 'What do you actually mean?' and/or', 'What is 'it' that you are actually referring to, exactly?'.
I will, again, suggest taking advantage of 'this advantage'.
For all you posters, here, know, there might actually be One, here, who actually does understand and know, more, than what you people actually believe or think It does.
