Page 4 of 7
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 12:26 am
by accelafine
Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 02, 2024 9:49 pm
accelafine:
There is also the fact that 100% of rapes are committed by men so really you can all just go fuck yourselves, including men who cosplay as 'women' even though wokeroacherismm in its misogynistic wisdom is skewing statistics by recording them when they rape and murder as women's crimes.
K: and this is in fact not true that 100% of rapes are by men...
in fact, stats suggest that 6% of all rapes are by women....
women on women rape and women on children rape is included....
we hear about women raping men..... it's not unheard of at all.....
Kropotkin
Every stat I've seen says it's at least 99%. How exactly is a woman going to rape a man? Ask him to kindly bend over while she shoves a salami up his butt-hole? Exceptions only prove the rule as they say. Female sexual assault is so rare that it's just pathetic of you to even mention it as a defence. There are always going to be exceptions to pretty much
anything you can think of. Hey, some women even have penises
And as I pointed out, statistics are being skewed by the rapes by so-called 'transwomen' being recorded as 'women'. We have your 'proud wokeroachery' to 'thank' for that-- and some of those are man on man rapes.
But of course a misogynistic old 'proudly woke' man like you would only focus on the minuscule number of sexual assaults by females, but at the same time you would rather die than mention rape statistics by ethnicity (don't forget to clutch your pearls).
There is a reason why the word 'rape' refers SPECIFICALLY to men ( and don't go away and consult online Merriam Webster, the wokest of woke McDikshinries. I have a real dictionary--from a time before we had all this shit inflicted on us).
Rape: (of a
man) force (another person) to have sexual intercourse with
HIM against their will.
The very definition of the word 'rape' refers only to males.
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 3:51 am
by attofishpi
Over 10 thousand people marched peacefully (branded by newspaper media prior to event as hooligans & thugs) through London on 1st June.
Was it reported ANYWHERE on official TV news channels? Nah..I wonder why?
Pro Palestinian marches, plenty of footage - apart from the waving of Isis flags, Hamas placards and the reporting of a police woman being smashed in the face with a bottle, ending up in hospital.
I WONDER WHY THEY DON"T REPORT THAT?
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:17 am
by Peter Kropotkin
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 12:26 am
Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Sun Jun 02, 2024 9:49 pm
accelafine:
There is also the fact that 100% of rapes are committed by men so really you can all just go fuck yourselves, including men who cosplay as 'women' even though wokeroacherismm in its misogynistic wisdom is skewing statistics by recording them when they rape and murder as women's crimes.
K: and this is in fact not true that 100% of rapes are by men...
in fact, stats suggest that 6% of all rapes are by women....
women on women rape and women on children rape is included....
we hear about women raping men..... it's not unheard of at all.....
Kropotkin
Every stat I've seen says it's at least 99%. How exactly is a woman going to rape a man? Ask him to kindly bend over while she shoves a salami up his butt-hole? Exceptions only prove the rule as they say. Female sexual assault is so rare that it's just pathetic of you to even mention it as a defence. There are always going to be exceptions to pretty much
anything you can think of. Hey, some women even have penises
And as I pointed out, statistics are being skewed by the rapes by so-called 'transwomen' being recorded as 'women'. We have your 'proud wokeroachery' to 'thank' for that-- and some of those are man on man rapes.
But of course a misogynistic old 'proudly woke' man like you would only focus on the minuscule number of sexual assaults by females, but at the same time you would rather die than mention rape statistics by ethnicity (don't forget to clutch your pearls).
There is a reason why the word 'rape' refers SPECIFICALLY to men ( and don't go away and consult online Merriam Webster, the wokest of woke McDikshinries. I have a real dictionary--from a time before we had all this shit inflicted on us).
Rape: (of a
man) force (another person) to have sexual intercourse with
HIM against their will.
The very definition of the word 'rape' refers only to males
K: From Wiki:
Female-on-male rape is under-researched compared to other forms of sexual violence.[16][17] Statistics on the prevalence of female-on-male sexual violence, and its psychological effects are inconsistent across studies.[17] One study (Hannon et al.) found 23.4% of women and 10.5% of men reported they were raped, while 6.6% of women and 10.5% of men reported they were victims of attempted rape.[18] A 2010–2012 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that one in 17 men (5.9%) reported being made to penetrate at some point in their lives[10] (up from 4.8% in 2010).[11] The surveys also found that male victims often reported only female perpetrators in instances of being made to penetrate (2012: 78.5%, 2010: 79.2%), sexual coercion (2012: 81.6%, 2010: 83.6%), and unwanted sexual contact (2012: 53.0%, 2010: 53.1%).[10][11] Among male victims who were raped by being penetrated, 86.5% reported only male perpetrators,[10] (down from 93.3% in the previous study published in 2010).[11] A 2008 study of 98 men interviewed on the United States National Crime Victimization Survey found that nearly half of the men (46%) who reported some form of sexual victimization were victimized by women.[19]
Regarding female-on-male sexual misconduct, the US Dept. of Justice reports in its opening statement (page 5): "An estimated 4.4% of prison inmates and 3.1% of jail inmates reported experiencing one or more incidents of sexual victimization by another inmate or facility staff in the past 12 months or since admission to the facility, if less than 12 months." Regarding female-on-male sexual misconduct (page 25) it states: "Among the 39,121 male prison inmates who had been victims of staff sexual misconduct, 69% reported sexual activity with female staff; an additional 16% reported sexual activity with both female and male staff (table 18)." and "Nearly two-thirds of the male jail inmates who had been victimized said the staff perpetrator was female (64%)."[20]
Male victims of sexual abuse by females[21] often face social, political, and legal double standards.[22] The case of Cierra Ross' sexual assault of a man in Chicago[23] gained national headlines, and Ross was convicted of aggravated criminal sexual abuse and armed robbery with a bail set at $75,000. A similar case includes James Landrith, who was made to penetrate a female acquaintance in a hotel room while incapacitated from drinking, while his rapist cited the fact that she was pregnant to advise him not to struggle, as it might hurt the baby.[24][25]
Several widely publicized cases of female-on-male statutory rape in the United States involved school teachers having illegal sex with their underage students (see Mary Kay Letourneau and Debra Lafave). There have also been cases where an underage male victim of statutory rape was ordered by a judge to pay child support after the woman became pregnant (see Hermesmann v. Seyer).[26][27][28]
K: will you admit you are wrong, or shall I bring in more evidence?
Kropotkin
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:26 am
by accelafine
What does any of that have to do with anything? Why is it just one giant 'quote' that includes me? Stupid old fart.
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:30 am
by Peter Kropotkin
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:26 am
What does any of that have to do with anything? Why is it just one giant 'quote' that includes me? Stupid old fart.
K: and more evidence it is....
The most recent large-scale dataset incorporating forced-to-penetrate cases is the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2010 conducted in the US; 16,507 adults were interviewed, using a random digit dial telephone survey, on their ‘experiences of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence’ (Breiding et al., Reference Breiding, Chen and Black2014, p. 1). Defining ‘being made to penetrate’ for men as including forced penetration by the victims’ penis or mouth into the perpetrators vagina, anus or mouth, as well as attempts (Breiding et al., Reference Breiding, Chen and Black2014, p. 81), it was found that ‘approximately 1 in 21 (4.8%) of men reported that they were made to penetrate someone else during their lifetime’ (Black et al., Reference Black, Basile, Breiding, Smith, Walters, Merrick, Chen and Stevens2011, p. 2). Of those 4.8 per cent, 79.2 per cent reported the perpetrator as being female (Black et al., Reference Black, Basile, Breiding, Smith, Walters, Merrick, Chen and Stevens2011, p. 24).
Smaller-scale studies have provided further evidence of the prevalence of this type of offending. For example, Krahé et al. (Reference Krahé, Scheinberger-Olwig and Bieneck2003a, p. 165) conducted two studies in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, on ‘the extent to which men become targets of women's sexual aggression’. Defining rape as penile–vaginal intercourse through the use or threat of force, they found that, of the 247 younger men (with an average age of 18.3 years) who completed the anonymous questionnaire, 2.8 per cent of them had been forced to vaginally penetrate a woman. Of the 152 older participants (with an average age of 22.3 years), 5.2 per cent of the men reported experiencing compelled penetration (Krahé et al., Reference Krahé, Scheinberger-Olwig and Bieneck2003a, p. 172).
K: rape is not a strictly male thing...
women can and do rape men and children....along with other women....
Kropotkin
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:48 am
by accelafine
You clearly have no reading comprehension skills so this is pointless. Back to 'ignore'.
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 5:06 am
by Peter Kropotkin
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:48 am
You clearly have no reading comprehension skills so this is pointless. Back to 'ignore'.
K: so you concede my point that rape is not a ''male'' thing....
women can rape women, men and children... as you have admitted
that, we can move on..... carry on...
Kropotkin
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 8:00 am
by attofishpi
Peter Bleksley - form MET Police Detective suggests people demand to know what information is being held on MET databases - since Police tweeted that they saw a lot of anti-lockdown protestors involved in the march. Has some interesting thoughts about the commissioner of police Mark Rowley.
“Tommy Robinson Thanked And Praised Police” | Demonstrators March Demading Sir Mark Rowley Resigns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oautLOPcwpg
Sign Our Petition To Remove Mark Rowley as Commissioner of Police
https://www.urbanscoop.news/petition-to ... of-police/
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:07 am
by attofishpi
WOW!
This grandma utuber reveals how BIAS the media reported the 1st June event - LIES.
Tommy Robinson Two-Tier Policing Protest - How the Papers Reported It.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp6wFEW9QkA&t=565s
The I watched the entire event streamed, ONLY "anti-Muslim chant" ...was "Allah, Allah, who the fuck is Allah!?"
(Oh, and that chant only happened about twice from some of the crowd as they walked to the event)
Re: BROADCAST TV MEDIA - silent on racial divide
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:35 am
by attofishpi
FlashDangerpants wrote:"white supremacists"
Er, you might want to listen to what this proud Englishman has to say as he marched with the "far-right racist football hooligans"...
And while you're there, check the previous video above from a grandma reporting on the distorted lies of the MEDIA that once once a long time ago, was unbiased and would be expected to report the TRUTH.
About the DIVERSITY MARCH on June 1st 2024 - Protest against totalitarianism - My thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0PWzZnkLAg

UK TV & NEWSPAPER MEDIA - biased reporting - not TRUTH
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:42 am
by attofishpi
@lexielex2898
11 hours ago
I posted this comment on Paul Thorpes and Mahyar Tousi's YouTube channel, and now here too.
"Dear" MainStreamMedia,
I live in a small town in the Netherlands where during WW2, many innocent British soldiers and pilots lost their lives,fighting for the freedom of my country, but also for the freedom of Europe. Every year these people are still remembered at the many monuments in the Netherlands with heart-warming speeches .Because of these very brave,mostly young men,(and many more who lost their lives in WW2)we were born in freedom.And everyone in Europe said:"NEVER AGAIN"!Our ancestors worked hard to rebuild Europe, for the future of themselves, their children and their grandchildren.
Almost 80 years later, our freedom is threatened again. And people in Europe say: "NOT AGAIN,NEVER AGAIN"!Yesterday,the people of the United Kingdom said:"NOT AGAIN,NEVER AGAIN,ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"!
And look what happens. You,MSM, continue to portray these people as the far right while the real( extreme and dangerous) enemy is openly marching through our European cities, week after week,after week.With flags that are not ours,with slogans that give you goosebumps.
What I saw yesterday(many! thanks to Tommy Robinson, Paul Thorpe,Mahyar Tousi,ShadyShae and many,many more) were people who are deeply concerned about the future of their country,about the future of their children and grandchildren. Who are concerned about the future of Europe, our freedom, our Christian values.
How (fakking*)dare you portray these people as far right.How (fakking*) dare you!?!?!
These people are fair and more than right about what happens in the UK and in Europe.
An incredible amount of respect for the people who walked the rally yesterday, a deep bow to all of you!
Sincerely, Lexie
Re: UK TV & NEWSPAPER MEDIA - biased reporting - not TRUTH
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 3:42 pm
by attofishpi
Sculptor wrote:--

--
Ironic isn't it Chaz? -- that all along you thought British media were balanced in their reporting of events.
ALL we are trying to do, is WAKE the British Lion - of fairness - ya what our Grandfathers sacrificed themselves for...against RACISM - u fucking IRONIC TWATS of the LEFT...best you leave and left...get a tad more right
..or is the rights of Drag Queens reading stories to children more important?
Re: UK TV & NEWSPAPER MEDIA - biased reporting - not TRUTH
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:39 pm
by Sculptor
attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 3:42 pm
Sculptor wrote:--

--
Ironic isn't it Chaz? -- that all along you thought British media were balanced in their reporting of events.
No I've never thought that.
That does not make Tommy Robinson truthful nor worthy.
Re: UK TV & NEWSPAPER MEDIA - biased reporting - not TRUTH
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 5:14 pm
by Peter Kropotkin
Sculptor:
Scuplter: Ironic isn't it Chaz? -- that all along you thought British media were balanced in their reporting of events.
ATTO:
ALL we are trying to do, is WAKE the British Lion - of fairness - ya what our Grandfathers sacrificed themselves for...against RACISM - u fucking IRONIC TWATS of the LEFT...best you leave and left...get a tad more right
..or is the rights of Drag Queens reading stories to children more important?
K: two things, one it isn't a question of being ''more important'' it is a question
of being equally important....that drag queens have the same rights as I do
is the important part...
secondly: I gotta say, you should really seek out why you have such
a fetish about drag Queens.... you accused me of being a drag queen
and now you bring in another example.... why do you have such
a fetish about drag queens? The only time I EVER think about
drag queens is when someone like you brings it up... otherwise,
I don't pay any attention, of any kind to drag queens....
so, why do you?
Kropotkin
Re: UK TV & NEWSPAPER MEDIA - biased reporting - not TRUTH
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:38 am
by attofishpi
Harris Sultan - another ex-Muslim discusses Mohammed Hijab - wow, talk about a man of HATE. (studied at Oxford I think)
DO ISLAMISTS LIKE MOHAMMED HIJAB REALLY LOVE DEATH AS THEY CLAIM?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iORVrEjCALM&t=265s