Re: You have to be stupid to believe in God.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 12:35 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Hey! Doesn't mean I am stating that there is NO OTHER POSSIBILITY - I'm open to what you conceive God to be - What is God to you Age?Age wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 12:28 amWILL you PROVIDE JUST ONE of these ALLEGED sentences??attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pmDon't bother attempting to discuss anything with me, you can't even string logical comprehendable sentences together half the time.Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:31 pm
WHY does God HAVE TO BE EITHER:
1. Divine and constructs our reality in real-time.
2. A.I. - Artificial Intelligence - that we have evolved into a simulation (see simulation hypothesis) ..again, our reality is constructed in real-time.
NB. The reason we would evolve into a simulation is to conserve resources as entropy increases.
3. A combination of the above.
WHY, to you, there could NEVER be absolutely ANY OTHER POSSIBILITY?
If no, then WHY NOT?
What is 'it' that you are AFRAID and SCARED OF here, EXACTLY?
'you', "attofishpi" are ANOTHER one who is VERY QUICK to ACCUSE me of some 'thing' WHEN 'you' are RUNNING AWAY, but VERY USELESS in backing up and supporting YOUR CLAIM. LOL 'you' are NOT even ABLE to PROVIDE just ONE EXAMPLE of what 'you' CLAIM I have done, and this IS BECAUSE ABSOLUTELY NONE EXIST.
WHERE you STATED and WROTE the WORDS:attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pm Just fucking read your question there!! WHERE AM I STATING THERE ABSOLUTELY CAN BE NO OTHER POSSIBILITY YOU FUCKING IMBECILE???
Either:-
1. God is divine and constructs our reality in real-time.
2. 'God' is A.I. - Artificial Intelligence - that we have evolved into a simulation (see simulation hypothesis) ..again, our reality is constructed in real-time.
NB. The reason we would evolve into a simulation is to conserve resources as entropy increases.
3. but, then it could also be this:- God is a combination of the above.
THIS THREAD IS PROOF OF POINT 1. or 2. or 3.: BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
That is WHERE, 'you FUCKING IMBECILE'.
By the way, do you think or BELIEVE that the last TWO WORDS ACTUALLY HELP here in ANY WAY whatsoever?
OBVIOUSLY IF there can ONLY be the POSSIBILITY of EITHER of 'the above', THEN, to 'you', there could NOT be ABSOLUTELY ANY OTHER POSSIBILITY, to you, correct?
What other Christians that claim actual gnosis? I haven't met one, and haven't heard anything that equals what is now 25 years of experience.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:40 pmattofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:53 pm I DONT GIVE A FUCK WHAT ANY OF YOU BELIEVE! WHAT FUCKS ME OFF IS THE ARROGANCE OF STUPID ATHEISTS IN LABELLING THOSE WITH GNOSIS AS STUPID.
Seriously?
If your gnosis is completely at odds with all other Christians' gnosis, why would you trust what you think you "gKnow", or is your gKnow just a Gnu?
I don't like being called stupid.
What other Christians that claim actual gnosis? I haven't met one, and haven't heard anything that equals what is now 25 years of experience.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:40 pmattofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:53 pm I DONT GIVE A FUCK WHAT ANY OF YOU BELIEVE! WHAT FUCKS ME OFF IS THE ARROGANCE OF STUPID ATHEISTS IN LABELLING THOSE WITH GNOSIS AS STUPID.
Seriously?
If your gnosis is completely at odds with all other Christians' gnosis, why would you trust what you think you "gKnow", or is your gKnow just a Gnu?
I don't like being called stupid.
So, to you, it follows that if some 'thing' is EITHER:attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:53 amHey! Doesn't mean I am stating that there is NO OTHER POSSIBILITY - I'm open to what you conceive God to beAge wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 12:28 amWILL you PROVIDE JUST ONE of these ALLEGED sentences??attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pm
Don't bother attempting to discuss anything with me, you can't even string logical comprehendable sentences together half the time.
If no, then WHY NOT?
What is 'it' that you are AFRAID and SCARED OF here, EXACTLY?
'you', "attofishpi" are ANOTHER one who is VERY QUICK to ACCUSE me of some 'thing' WHEN 'you' are RUNNING AWAY, but VERY USELESS in backing up and supporting YOUR CLAIM. LOL 'you' are NOT even ABLE to PROVIDE just ONE EXAMPLE of what 'you' CLAIM I have done, and this IS BECAUSE ABSOLUTELY NONE EXIST.
WHERE you STATED and WROTE the WORDS:attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pm Just fucking read your question there!! WHERE AM I STATING THERE ABSOLUTELY CAN BE NO OTHER POSSIBILITY YOU FUCKING IMBECILE???
Either:-
1. God is divine and constructs our reality in real-time.
2. 'God' is A.I. - Artificial Intelligence - that we have evolved into a simulation (see simulation hypothesis) ..again, our reality is constructed in real-time.
NB. The reason we would evolve into a simulation is to conserve resources as entropy increases.
3. but, then it could also be this:- God is a combination of the above.
THIS THREAD IS PROOF OF POINT 1. or 2. or 3.: BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
That is WHERE, 'you FUCKING IMBECILE'.
By the way, do you think or BELIEVE that the last TWO WORDS ACTUALLY HELP here in ANY WAY whatsoever?
OBVIOUSLY IF there can ONLY be the POSSIBILITY of EITHER of 'the above', THEN, to 'you', there could NOT be ABSOLUTELY ANY OTHER POSSIBILITY, to you, correct?
In the most simplest of terms, God is;
Ok. So do you consider God to be DIVINE or other - possibly that a cold-logic manifestation of matter managed to form into intelligent beings and these intelligent beings (perhaps humans) eventually created a God to watch over all?
I consider the word 'God' means or is referring to;attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 4:05 amOk. So do you consider God to be DIVINE or other
I would NOT say that human beings, in the days when this is being written, have YET managed to form, nor have YET evolved, into Truly 'intelligent' beings.attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:53 am - possibly that a cold-logic manifestation of matter managed to form into intelligent beings and these intelligent beings (perhaps humans) eventually created a God to watch over all?
I have ALREADY, as above, (from my comprehension).attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 4:05 am Please elaborate on what this God is from your comprehension.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAmeaM0-iA4Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 12:23 pm You have to be stupid to believe in God.
And god did that on purpose!!!
1 Corithians 1
Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24 but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.
26 Brothers and sisters, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. 28 God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him. 30 It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. 31 Therefore, as it is written: “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.”
So here we see the beginnings of antisemitism and anti intellectualism inherent in Christianity.
Not only does this insult jews but also anyone who intelligently asks questions about faith.
Verse 28 Literally says that god is stupid to confuse intelligent people. Maybe he wants only idiots to follow, because they are more compliant?