Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:08 pm**

Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:07 pm
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 4:27 pm
Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:15 pm K: and yet, at no time did you present any facts to support your position...
you just said climate change is woke... and that's it..
Kropotkin
You'll never have all the facts about anything. But, you have enough. You're human. You can think, and reason accurately.

The Woke Folks are the monitors for the Climate Change Cult, and any other propaganda being pushed by the gubberment. They’re the self-appointed arbiters of your behavior and speech, thus their intent is to “put up the highest possible social currency” in support of the cult, to force and reinforce. Force, and reinforce.

To spur their efforts, the Woke believe that if they don’t do their duty and enforce the Cult, then it’s the end of the world for the planet and everything on it. They’re on a mission from … Cult, not God.

This is why they often sound so shrill and nagging when there’s a change in the weather and we get a bit of a hot spell, or a bit of cold spell. To the Woke, their discomfort is a reminder that Humans, yes, those evil humans with all their electricity needs for those batteries, are a threat to the entire world.

This threat is caused by all the careless, selfish Unwoke who have yet to awaken, if they even can awaken, that is, and if they can’t or won’t wake up, well, no doubt there are contingency plans for that.

We’re all just walking, talking lumps of carbon in the really big view of the Climate Change Cult.
K: I feel sorry for you.. I am... you are so lost in your beliefs that you can't spot the
truth to save your life... if 97% of climate scientists believe that climate
change is true, what evidence do you have to disagree with it?
Not opinions, but actual facts, evidence.. if your doctor says, you have cancer,
an expert says so, on what basis do you have to disagree with your doctor?
I would rather engage with facts and evidence than hold opinions that
may cause me to die...and that is all you have... opinion and not facts/evidence

Kropotkin

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:30 pm**

Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:08 pm...

How do you define climate change? That's a rather broad term, made broad on purpose of course, after some experimentation. It's more encompassing than global cooling from the seventies, or global warming.

The Climate Change Cult says that no matter what man does to purposely change the climate, mans' efforts to change the climate will have a negligible effect on the climate.

Is that what climate change means?

To use transparently sneaky language, is that what you're trying to say, that climate change means to you?

Or, are you simply saying that the climate changes, and that you pity me for not knowing that the climate changes.

Well, here's the good news. Your pity is misplaced. Place it elsewhere, but with greater intelligence and care this time. I have some suggestions about where you can stick it, if you draw a blank.

Yes, the climate does change ... she does achange, all right.

Did you know, They Call The Wind, Mariah? Of course, you probably do. Do you know why. Legend has it that at a very important moment during a ceremony one of the big wigs broke wind and a noted scholar on hand for the occasion was heard to mutter, Mariah!, which happened to be a mild expletive in the culture at that time, and which was uttered because unfortunately, the scholar was standing directly in the breeze.

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:10 pm**

Interesting.

When you look at the world, you just have to pity.

Me? I have to laugh.

*

Phillip Baker Hall.

The Library Cop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9tP9fI2zbE

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:23 pm**

Peter Kropotkin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:08 pm K: I feel sorry for you

Your conclusion is based on misapprehension.

Oh, I don’t laugh at everything, usually just stupid comments such as folks who pity, but your comment raises an important ethical question.

Besides, who the hell are you to pity anyone?
(That's the important ethical question. To pity, assumes much. You pity. You assume much.)

You know, assuming much is consistent with a Climate Change Cultist. You ain't one of them, are you? I hear they're all racist, which may be just a metaphor since they're actually bigoted with the assertions of settled science.

Climate change is settled science? How can you not laugh?

Philosophy Now Forum

When I look at the world

Re: When I look at the world

Re: When I look at the world

Re: When I look at the world

Re: When I look at the world