Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:28 am
But I have never made the claim, I have only informed the data.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:59 amWhat does "informed the data" actually mean?
Inform means to make known what was not previously known. It's known as reporting.
But I was NOT asking what the word 'inform' means. I CLEARLY asked what do the words "informed the data" mean?
Also, could you have been False reporting, or MISLEADING, information/data?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:28 am
And yes, there exists somewhere information about how "china" fired a missile 'that defies the laws of physics'
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:59 amWell obviously you have actually read that somewhere, or you have just made it up.
Now, if it is the former, then you could very easily and very simply inform of where you read that, correct?
It's up to you if you want to see the information in written form again.
I KNOW.
ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing is 'up to me' if I want some thing.
BUT, my question asked you that IF you read the information somewhere, then you could VERY EASILY and VERY SIMPLY link us to that, supposed and alleged, 'information'.
But you are under NO obligation AT ALL to do so. However, let us NOT FORGET you did CLAIM some 'thing' here. And, if you can not or do not back up and support that CLAIM, then this sort of goes against the unwritten INTENTION of what 'arguing' is about.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
I've already supplied the link to where you can see the information again.
WHERE is that 'link'?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
That other place is google.
Writing the word 'google' is NOT an ACTUAL 'link'.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
Google is everywhere at once, it's on yours and anyone elses computer desktop, it really is, I'm not kidding, it's there everytime you switch on your computer, in plain sight, waiting for you to discover 24/7 whatever it is you want to know.
Could the REASON WHY you do NOT want to provide an ACTUAL 'link' to the ACTUAL WORDS, which you based your CLAIM on, be because what you CLAIMED here is NOWHERE to be found on the internet?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
There is always a copy of information stored here, which is actually inside the brain, but you cannot see the brain, you can only see it's effects in the form of images. These words are basically just images upon that which can never be seen, only known.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:28 am
The data can be researched through the medium of Google, as I've already informed you of.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:59 amWHY do so many of 'you', adult human beings, resort to this "find your own information" when 'trying so hard' to DEFLECT when being CHALLENGED or QUESTIONED in regards to the claims you make?
Let us NOT forget that it was you who wrote, " China fired second missile '
that defies the laws of physics' ".
I didn't make the claim that China fired second missile that defies the laws of physics... I simply reported the information by copy and pasting the information to this forum.
If you wrote words, which are making a claim, then IT IS 'you' who is MAKING THE CLAIM.
Now, I can NOT find ANYWHERE on the internet ANY words that say the EXACT SAME 'thing' as you SUPPOSEDLY "copied and pasted".
And, because you will NOT provide a link to those ACTUAL WORDS, has left the readers to SEE that you are being VERY DECEPTIVE here.
Which, by the way, is NOT very uncommon at all. Especially when I question and/or challenge people on the CLAIMS they make.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
The information is already here. Here,can also be found there at the google search engine, which is Here.
LOL But that, alleged, "information" is NOT "Here" NOR "There".
That "information" was and is of your OWN MAKING.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:59 amNow, I consider this you making a claim, although you might not. And, AGAIN, I will suggest that if one makes a claim (or informs the data), then it is much better if they have the ACTUAL PROOF, which backs up and supports the claim/data, BEFORE, they make the claim or share the data, in the first place.
I have no idea who claimed the data that China fired second missile that defies the laws of physics.[/quote]
I KNOW EXACTLY who made that CLAIM, and who that was was 'you', "dontaskme", and from what I have found so far NO one "else" but 'you'.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
I'm simply reporting that data, by copy and pasting that data from there to here.
LOOK, you NEVER informed us that 'this information' is what is being reported, NOR will you even provide a link to where 'this information' is or came from. What you CLEARLY WROTE, however, was:
Rocket failure delays US hypersonic glide missile test in Alaska after China fired second missile 'that defies the laws of physics' and increased panic in the West
Which, thee ACTUAL Truth IS, and which can be CLEARLY SEEN is a CLAIM that 'you', "dontaskme", wrote for us to READ and SEE.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:16 am
Although you can never get there from here, you can only get here from there.