Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:23 am
How could one universe be, logically and empirically, composed of multiple universes?
If a universe is a classification of a grouping of matter and space, then this does NOT mean that this classification of a grouping of matter and space includes the matter and space of ANOTHER universe. For if it was this way, then this would just be illogical, absurd, AND ridiculous.
The same manner in which one line is composed of multiple lines.
LOL Okay. If this is what you BELIEVE, then so be it.
Is One human being composed of multiple human beings, also?
One person is composed of multiple identities given they socialize with multiple different types of people.
A VERY OBVIOUS twisted distortion on my clarifying question.
I asked about a 'human being'. You, however, responded with the words 'person' AND 'identities'.
A human being is a person and this personhood is what defines the human being as human being. Each human being exists through multiple human beings given the human being in x time and space is not the same human being in y time and space.
Is One 'person' composed of multiple 'persons', also?
Yes, see above.
And, If thee One and ONLY Universe can be composed of many universes, which is what you CLAIM IS TRUE, then HOW?
The universe exists through recursive fractals these recursive fractals are multiple universes stemming from the one. The one exists through the many.
Is One boat composed of multiple boats, as well?
The boat resting at a dock is not the same as one sailing through the water. Dually the same boat as having one sail then having the same sail replaced by another is not the same boat.
But in CONSTANT CHANGE is EXACTLY what this One and ONLY Universe IS, EXACTLY.
The universe as constant change is a different universe in x portion of a timeline compared to a universe in y portion of the timeline.
Also, there is NO problem at all of classification. If there is ANY problem at all, then it is the 'problem' that you are causing and creating by you attempts at WRONG classifying, in order to fit in with and suit your ALREADY held BELIEFS.
The classification of 'A Universe' MEANS that there can EVER only be thee One and only Universe.
"A" implies one amidst many. There is "a" dog and this dog is one among many.
And A Universe can also mean THEE One and ONLY Universe.
Now who is changing the definition to fit their beliefs 
?
'A' does NOT 'HAVE TO' imply one amidst many at all. 'A' can ALSO imply One and ONLY amidst NONE ELSE.
Implication implies, it does not show a direct cause and effect.
You, human beings, can 'try to' reclassify things, or 'try to' redefine things, to suit, and fit in, with your ALREADY held BELIEFS, but all you are doing is confusing, complicating, and making hard what is essentially EXTREMELY SIMPLE and VERY EASY to SEE and UNDERSTAND.
False, the classifications are by default a part of the universe.
LOL
You can try as MANY ways as you like to "justify" your ALREADY held BELIEFS, but that does NOT work.
By the way, the One is ALREADY KNOWN in Its Totality.
If the one is known in its totality then you would know all future events before they would happen. You would known tommorows lottery ticket numbers.
Being ALREADY KNOWN does NOT mean that it is ALREADY KNOWN by the 'me', OBVIOUSLY.
I have ALREADY said that thee Universe is both One and composes of many. You, however, are just incapable, at the moment, to SEE and UNDERSTAND HOW thee Universe, Itself, does ACTUALLY exist independent of anything else.
It does not exist as independent of its many fractal parts.
LOL ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of 'trying' absolutely ANY thing.
I just, OBVIOUSLY, said that thee One and ONLY Universe is both One and COMPOSES OF MANY. Therefore, thee One and ONLY Universe exists dependent upon its many fractal parts.
As I said, I have ALREADY said this AND AGREED WITH THIS.
I said the universe is both one and many, not one and composes many.
Second each fractal part is a variation of the whole thus is distinctly different from the whole.
Each fractal part is a unique universe in and of itself and while the whole is a summation of these parts each part is fundamentally different from the whole.
There is no universe which is completely the same. To argue the universe is a summation of multiple universes is to argue that the universe is dependent upon many different universes thus is not completely dependent upon itself given the whole is different from each fractal it is dependent upon.
You are being hilarious here SHOWING and REVEALING 'your' MANY attempts and ways to 'TRY TO' "justify" those ALREADY HELD BELIEFS, which you are OBVIOUSLY so strongly attempting to HOLD ONTO.
These fractal parts are all variations of the one thus different from the one. For example the number 2 is a recursion of one. Two is both a distinct number in itself and a variation of one as one number. In the number line progressing from one to two one and many number lines occur. One number line as the summation of all numbers and many numbers lines as each number line is distinct as a reflection of the singular number line which is distinct. The individual lines, ie multiple lines, reflect the same nature of the single number line, ie act as individual lines, given they are extensions of the one line and thus embody its properties.