That would imply that nature uses consciousness as a means to localize realities or create new dimensions. To simplify this point, if "x" particles exist as "y" in "z" space, and we take "x" particles and repeat their relations as "y" in space "a" then nature creates its own boundaries through the consciousness that exists as an extension of it.
It blurs the line between the definition of artificial and natural as the laws of the natural exist within certain frameworks that consciousness overrides (using the particle cooling experiment again as an example).
I think there are minds, conscious entities, which dictate how natural world should function. How it could cause anything otherwise?
The problem is that this consciousness, mind, etc. are extensions of this very same natural world so what we understand of consciousness at minimum requires a self-referential looping phenomenon that progressively expands definition through a mirror like replication where any variation of this repetition occur under randomness acting as a negative limit which forms the variations in these phenomenon...if any of this makes sense.
We have two things, mind and the stuff that we experience, so called Qualia. Qualia is created by mind and can affect mind through experience. Mind can respond in completely unrelated way to experience or can follow a structured manner.
