Page 4 of 9
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:04 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:21 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:05 pm
Excuse for what? I've never used a 'spellchecker' EVER. It's also in shitty yanklish anyway. Why don't you just fuck off you senile old fool.
You misspelled Yanglish fool. And you can reset the language booboo (if you never used the tool, then how can you know it's in American dolt?) You're such a moron.
Hooray for the red, white and blue.
PhilX
Why should I go to the bother of 'resetting' from pidgin to English? I don't need some yank nerd telling me how to spell, or anyone else for that matter. English evolved from many languages, over a very long time. Yanks tried to change it practically overnight. The obnoxious misspelling is mainly 'thanks' to one man: Webster. Trying to phoneticise and 'simplify' (dumb down) English was a big mistake, not to mention impossible. All he ended up with was a confusing, inconsistent, annoying mess-- a mess that's spreading its poison everywhere. He was responsible for a collective lobotomy on a national scale. It explains pretty much everything that is wrong with your country.
Children all over the world are growing up using his shitty 'dictionary' online, thinking it's the real deal. Notice how it always appears first? It's like comparing Bach to Bieber.
''Webster dedicated his Speller and Dictionary to providing an
intellectual foundation for American nationalism.'' Haha. That worked out really well. He certainly did just that. That explains why y'all take such pride in being idiots. You view 'intellectualism' as being 'European' and 'unAmerican'. Irony is so wasted on Americans.
Re:
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:28 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:02 pm
Can be, but hasn't been (to include what you suggest), so, as I say, what you infer ain't there.
But, as you just said, can be and that's the point.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:06 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:04 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:21 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:05 pm
Excuse for what? I've never used a 'spellchecker' EVER. It's also in shitty yanklish anyway. Why don't you just fuck off you senile old fool.
You misspelled Yanglish fool. And you can reset the language booboo (if you never used the tool, then how can you know it's in American dolt?) You're such a moron.
Hooray for the red, white and blue.
PhilX
Why should I go to the bother of 'resetting' from pidgin to English? I don't need some yank nerd telling me how to spell, or anyone else for that matter. English evolved from many languages, over a very long time. Yanks tried to change it practically overnight. The obnoxious misspelling is mainly 'thanks' to one man: Webster. Trying to phoneticise and 'simplify' (dumb down) English was a big mistake, not to mention impossible. All he ended up with was a confusing, inconsistent, annoying mess-- a mess that's spreading its poison everywhere. He was responsible for a collective lobotomy on a national scale. It explains pretty much everything that is wrong with your country.
Children all over the world are growing up using his shitty 'dictionary' online, thinking it's the real deal. Notice how it always appears first? It's like comparing Bach to Bieber.
''Webster dedicated his Speller and Dictionary to providing an
intellectual foundation for American nationalism.'' Haha. That worked out really well. He certainly did just that. That explains why y'all take such pride in being idiots. You view 'intellectualism' as being 'European' and 'unAmerican'. Irony is so wasted on Americans.
''Webster went a little bit too far when he made his first dictionary though. He dropped silent letters so words like "determine", "leopard" and "soup" became "determin", "leperd" and "soop". Some of his spellings obviously never caught on, but the break from Britain's English essentially started there. Some caught on like cutting U's from "colour" and "flavour" and putting R's after E's in "centre".''
He should have been dumped after his first 'dictionary' failed.
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:30 am
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:06 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:04 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:21 pm
You misspelled Yanglish fool. And you can reset the language booboo (if you never used the tool, then how can you know it's in American dolt?) You're such a moron.
Hooray for the red, white and blue.
PhilX
Why should I go to the bother of 'resetting' from pidgin to English? I don't need some yank nerd telling me how to spell, or anyone else for that matter. English evolved from many languages, over a very long time. Yanks tried to change it practically overnight. The obnoxious misspelling is mainly 'thanks' to one man: Webster. Trying to phoneticise and 'simplify' (dumb down) English was a big mistake, not to mention impossible. All he ended up with was a confusing, inconsistent, annoying mess-- a mess that's spreading its poison everywhere. He was responsible for a collective lobotomy on a national scale. It explains pretty much everything that is wrong with your country.
Children all over the world are growing up using his shitty 'dictionary' online, thinking it's the real deal. Notice how it always appears first? It's like comparing Bach to Bieber.
''Webster dedicated his Speller and Dictionary to providing an
intellectual foundation for American nationalism.'' Haha. That worked out really well. He certainly did just that. That explains why y'all take such pride in being idiots. You view 'intellectualism' as being 'European' and 'unAmerican'. Irony is so wasted on Americans.
''Webster went a little bit too far when he made his first dictionary though. He dropped silent letters so words like "determine", "leopard" and "soup" became "determin", "leperd" and "soop". Some of his spellings obviously never caught on, but the break from Britain's English essentially started there. Some caught on like cutting U's from "colour" and "flavour" and putting R's after E's in "centre".''
He should have been dumped after his first 'dictionary' failed.
Well he wasn't and I applaud him.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:50 am
by Philosophy Explorer
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:00 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:30 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:06 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:04 pm
Why should I go to the bother of 'resetting' from pidgin to English? I don't need some yank nerd telling me how to spell, or anyone else for that matter. English evolved from many languages, over a very long time. Yanks tried to change it practically overnight. The obnoxious misspelling is mainly 'thanks' to one man: Webster. Trying to phoneticise and 'simplify' (dumb down) English was a big mistake, not to mention impossible. All he ended up with was a confusing, inconsistent, annoying mess-- a mess that's spreading its poison everywhere. He was responsible for a collective lobotomy on a national scale. It explains pretty much everything that is wrong with your country.
Children all over the world are growing up using his shitty 'dictionary' online, thinking it's the real deal. Notice how it always appears first? It's like comparing Bach to Bieber.
''Webster dedicated his Speller and Dictionary to providing an
intellectual foundation for American nationalism.'' Haha. That worked out really well. He certainly did just that. That explains why y'all take such pride in being idiots. You view 'intellectualism' as being 'European' and 'unAmerican'. Irony is so wasted on Americans.
''Webster went a little bit too far when he made his first dictionary though. He dropped silent letters so words like "determine", "leopard" and "soup" became "determin", "leperd" and "soop". Some of his spellings obviously never caught on, but the break from Britain's English essentially started there. Some caught on like cutting U's from "colour" and "flavour" and putting R's after E's in "centre".''
He should have been dumped after his first 'dictionary' failed.
Well he wasn't and I applaud him.
PhilX
For turning the population into illiterate, nationalistic idiots like you? What a surprise.
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:04 am
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:00 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:30 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:06 am
''Webster went a little bit too far when he made his first dictionary though. He dropped silent letters so words like "determine", "leopard" and "soup" became "determin", "leperd" and "soop". Some of his spellings obviously never caught on, but the break from Britain's English essentially started there. Some caught on like cutting U's from "colour" and "flavour" and putting R's after E's in "centre".''
He should have been dumped after his first 'dictionary' failed.
Well he wasn't and I applaud him.
PhilX
For turning the population into illiterate, nationalistic idiots like you? What a surprise.
You must be the champ at making stupid remarks. As I said, if you don't like the program, change the channel.
PhilX
PS I wish you put as much effort into your spellchecker as you have into your emojis.
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:26 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:04 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:00 am
For turning the population into illiterate, nationalistic idiots like you? What a surprise.
You must be the champ at making stupid remarks. As I said, if you don't like the program, change the channel.
PhilX
PS I wish you put as much effort into your spellchecker as you have into your emojis.
From the creepy weirdo who sent me 500 pms in a row.
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 am
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:26 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:04 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:00 am
For turning the population into illiterate, nationalistic idiots like you? What a surprise.
You must be the champ at making stupid remarks. As I said, if you don't like the program, change the channel.
PhilX
PS I wish you put as much effort into your spellchecker as you have into your emojis.
From the creepy weirdo who sent me 500 pms in a row.
From the whiner who only knows how to exaggerate and lie a lot. I see you're practicing with your new emojis. Makes you feel like a kid again - correction you never knew how to grow up. Poor baby.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:48 am
by thedoc
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 am
From the whiner who only knows how to exaggerate and lie a lot. I see you're practicing with your new emojis. Makes you feel like a kid again - correction you never knew how to grow up. Poor baby.
PhilX
Well at least with VT posting there is a lot of crap to wade through, without her posts there would be less dross.
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:50 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:26 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:04 am
You must be the champ at making stupid remarks. As I said, if you don't like the program, change the channel.
PhilX
PS I wish you put as much effort into your spellchecker as you have into your emojis.
From the creepy weirdo who sent me 500 pms in a row.
From the whiner who only knows how to exaggerate and lie a lot. I see you're practicing with your new emojis. Makes you feel like a kid again - correction you never knew how to grow up. Poor baby.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 9:47 am
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:50 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:26 am
From the creepy weirdo who sent me 500 pms in a row.
From the whiner who only knows how to exaggerate and lie a lot. I see you're practicing with your new emojis. Makes you feel like a kid again - correction you never knew how to grow up. Poor baby.
PhilX
You don't have the brains to describe me.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 11:15 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 9:47 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:50 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 am
From the whiner who only knows how to exaggerate and lie a lot. I see you're practicing with your new emojis. Makes you feel like a kid again - correction you never knew how to grow up. Poor baby.
PhilX
You don't have the brains to describe me.
PhilX
Re: Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:18 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Gotcha.booboo.
PhilX
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:58 pm
by henry quirk
"But, as you just said, can be and that's the point."
Can we?
Sure.
Should we?
Hell no!
Again...
"Should we get rid of football and other contact sports?"
If folks go in with eyes open, they the ought to be allowed to abuse themselves however they like.
With kids, Ma and Pa (should) get the final say, not some busy-body bureaucrat.
