Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:Let's face it, the British are just a bunch of phony tea-drinking elitists who talk funny unless you wake them up in the middle of the night, and pay homage as well as taxes to a fairy tale queen.

Since we all have to pay £0.001 each to maintain the Queen it just makes me grateful that I don't live in the USA and have the burden of the largest percapita and the most corrupt and expensive defence spending anywhere in the world.

henry quirk wrote:Lot of Americans fit in that category too, Bob.

Please, I've never met an American that quite falls into Arising's category, a typical example of virtual subhumanity, huge egos and fonts trying to compensate for tiny brains.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:Since we all have to pay £0.001 each to maintain the Queen...

It was an early-American patriot who once said, "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."

bobevenson wrote:Please, I've never met an American that quite falls into Arising's category, a typical example of virtual subhumanity, huge egos and fonts trying to compensate for tiny brains.

Bob, are you intimidated that Arising's font is bigger than yours?

bobevenson wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:Since we all have to pay £0.001 each to maintain the Queen...

It was an early-American patriot who once said, "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."

You pay your millions and that is the public's tribute to their master.

bobevenson wrote:Please, you know as well as I do that limeys are virtually subhuman.

Honestly, Bob, how can you be so stark raving mad and stupid? The stuff that your brain-mouth combo spews is so idiotic... as to immediately and certainly invalidate any of your cockeyed schemes and ideas that you tout as divinely influenced. You have got to be one of the most ridiculous and delusional people I've ever seen roaming around in public. It is your kind of attitude and ignorance that gives the U.S. a bad name... and drags humankind down with such a painfully slow branch of evolution.

You ought to be in a laboratory being studied, so that we can find out how evolution became so fractured. If you have any decency and honorability at all, turn yourself in to the nearest loonie lab, and do something truly beneficial for humankind.

Lacewing wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Please, I've never met an American that quite falls into Arising's category, a typical example of virtual subhumanity, huge egos and fonts trying to compensate for tiny brains.

Bob, are you intimidated that Arising's font is bigger than yours?

I think he's intimidated that his brain, penis, etc. are outclassed by male and female.

PhilX

Lacewing wrote:Do something truly beneficial for humankind.

Honey, the proper term is "mankind," which shows how you have been eaten up by the so-called "progressives" of the world.

Time to evolve bob. Get with the times, join humankind and be specific.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/5962243/think-tw ... y-scholars

bobevenson wrote:... a typical example of virtual subhumanity, huge egos and fonts trying to compensate for tiny brains.

Please stop! The irony of the blind is killing me.

Bob, your continual idiotic focus on the WAY people express concepts rather than the valid points they're making, shows the tiny capacity of your brain... and your utter lack of courage in facing anything more substantial than tiny little nits. YOU are a tiny little nit.

bobevenson wrote:Is this a post-Olympic event between Arising, aka Kim (relationship to Ms. Novak still under investigation), versus Philosophy Explorer (who couldn't properly explore the inside of a paper bag without getting trapped within) on who can look more stupid by posting the most smilies?

No, this is a tag-team event between we vs you, except you haven't got a partner to tag team with.

PhilX

Lacewing wrote:Bob, your continual idiotic focus on the WAY people express concepts rather than the valid points they're making, shows the tiny capacity of your brain... and your utter lack of courage in facing anything more substantial than tiny little nits. YOU are a tiny little nit.

Please, would you point out a single valid point expressed by any of you idiots, and it doesn't even have to be related to the subject of this thread, which I do understand is far over your heads anyway.

Not sure if it's a valid point but it's certainly a valid question -

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So what are you bob, an agnostic or an absolute fool?