For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I agree with you. But I don't believe the government will reduce the eagle population, the opposite may happen (based on the article).vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Eagles are magnificent. To deliberately do something that will endanger them is despicable.
It's amazing that anyone who grows their own fruit and vegetables could survive at all, without the 'benefit' of friendly, harmless helpers like DDT.Walker wrote:Zika Emergency Crisis Due to Enviro Wackos
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0816/colon080916.php3
"Many of the world's leading scientists predicted 30 years ago that Carson's crusade against DDT would allow some of the world's deadliest diseases to return with dreadful consequences. The truth of that prediction is now upon us . . . right on schedule. The real tragedy is that our squeamishness regarding DDT is the major reason millions die in poor countries year after year. This does not have to be the case as eradication of disease-carrying mosquitoes can be simple and effective through the safe and effective use of DDT. That some in Congress cling to the completely debunked notion that DDT is unsafe for fish, wildlife, birds and humans defies common sense."
- Harold M. Koenig
The climate doesn't need fixing. Global warming is unproven.Walker wrote:The ABC of the situation.
https://www.masterresource.org/cuisinar ... doiletter/
The birds would be safe if only the climate did not change.
For the sake of life, end climate change.
Save for life, no cost is too high, no tax is too high.
But, wait until the days are warm and the nights are cool enough for a light jacket, maybe a sweater.
Only then, fix the climate so it doesn’t change anymore.
If hesitant, remember this is for the future, and the children.
I’m not so sure just anyone is allowed to contribute to a truth that requires a consensus.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The climate doesn't need fixing. Global warming is unproven.Walker wrote:The ABC of the situation.
https://www.masterresource.org/cuisinar ... doiletter/
The birds would be safe if only the climate did not change.
For the sake of life, end climate change.
Save for life, no cost is too high, no tax is too high.
But, wait until the days are warm and the nights are cool enough for a light jacket, maybe a sweater.
Only then, fix the climate so it doesn’t change anymore.
If hesitant, remember this is for the future, and the children.
PhilX
I see proof every day that global warming is pseudoscience. The fact that local weather forecasting is far from a science and global warming involves many more variables to predict accurately says something. Look at hurricane tracking, e.g., that uses about a dozen different models - the result being you get spaghetti all over your tv screen also says something.Walker wrote:I’m not so sure just anyone is allowed to contribute to a truth that requires a consensus.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The climate doesn't need fixing. Global warming is unproven.Walker wrote:The ABC of the situation.
https://www.masterresource.org/cuisinar ... doiletter/
The birds would be safe if only the climate did not change.
For the sake of life, end climate change.
Save for life, no cost is too high, no tax is too high.
But, wait until the days are warm and the nights are cool enough for a light jacket, maybe a sweater.
Only then, fix the climate so it doesn’t change anymore.
If hesitant, remember this is for the future, and the children.
PhilX
Besides, they have conferences and everything. Just had a big shindig in Paris not too long ago. In fact, it was a signature achievement, and peoples’ representatives are quite proud.
Here’s more evidence that the climate in fact, does change.
From one year ago.
Obama: Climate summit a 'powerful rebuke' to terrorists
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-enviro ... terrorists
Walker wrote:Science deniers in the wind industry
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/08/ ... -industry/
“Infrasound (inaudible) and low-frequency (audible) noise (slowly vibrating sound waves collectively referred to as ILFN) produced by Industrial-scale Wind Turbines (IWTs) directly and predictably cause adverse human health effects. The sonic radiation tends to be amplified within structures, and sensitivity to the impact of the resonance increases with continuing exposure.”
You can't blame the Americans. It was French trappers dipping down to get new game.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:13 pm Sadly Americans don't know the difference.
Like where the fuck did Buffalo Bill live? Singapore?
But those who destroy things or nearly do often get to name them.Although these animals have “bison” three times in their scientific name, they are often called buffalo. The word buffalo is derived from the French “bœuf,” a name given to bison when French fur trappers working in the US in the early 1600s saw the animals. The word bœuf came from what the French knew as true buffalo, animals living in Africa and Asia. Although this name was a mix-up of two different animals, many people still know bison as buffalo today.
Another name for these animals is “tatanka.” Tatanka is the Lakota word for bison. Bison are incredibly important in Lakota culture; the Lakota are traditionally nomadic and would have spent their lives following bison before Euro-Americans settled the West. Another word for bison in Lakota is “pte.” The Lakota are sometimes known as pte oyate, meaning “buffalo nation.”