For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Leaving out one question mark is probably a typo, but two? Also, I don't know who Saan is, but I'm terribly sorry you're becoming so unglued.Arising_uk wrote:But then the destruction of the US is your aim is it not. As you wish to hand the world to Saan and the Beast do you not.
Hmm, Arising_uk as a friend? it could be worse, a lot worse, people could think BobEverson was my friend.bobevenson wrote:Doc, I never thought I'd have to put you in the same category as Arising. You must be awfully lonely for a friend.
Aww! isn't that cute, Bob is playing dumb, except that he's not playing.bobevenson wrote:Leaving out one question mark is probably a typo, but two? Also, I don't know who Saan is, but I'm terribly sorry you're becoming so unglued.Arising_uk wrote:But then the destruction of the US is your aim is it not. As you wish to hand the world to Saan and the Beast do you not.
They weren't questions.bobevenson wrote:Leaving out one question mark is probably a typo, but two? ...
Also, I don't know who Saan is, but I'm terribly sorry you're becoming so unglued.
Not so unglued that I think a voice in my head is not mine but a 'God', although in your case its your 'Satan'.Well, I don't know who Bob Everson is, but I do wish you good luck in your pursuit of friends.thedoc wrote:Hmm, Arising_uk as a friend? it could be worse, a lot worse, people could think BobEverson was my friend.bobevenson wrote:Doc, I never thought I'd have to put you in the same category as Arising. You must be awfully lonely for a friend.
Not much of a prophet, are you?bobevenson wrote:Well, I don't know who Bob Evenson is, but I do wish you good luck in your pursuit of friends.thedoc wrote:Hmm, Arising_uk as a friend? it could be worse, a lot worse, people could think BobEvenson was my friend.bobevenson wrote:Doc, I never thought I'd have to put you in the same category as Arising. You must be awfully lonely for a friend.
I realize you're a slow learner, doc, so I'll say it again, prophecy is a divinely inspired utterance. Oh, by the way, since you changed Bob "Everson" to Bob "Evenson," I can tell you that I do know who Bob Evenson is, he's Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah, the wizard of Ouzo, and a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic.thedoc wrote:Not much of a prophet, are you?
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
So tell us oh 'prophet', are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
Better slow and get it right, than fast and get it wrong.bobevenson wrote:I realize you're a slow learner, doc, so I'll say it again, prophecy is a divinely inspired utterance. Oh, by the way, since you changed Bob "Everson" to Bob "Evenson," I can tell you that I do know who Bob Evenson is, he's Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah, the wizard of Ouzo, and a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic.thedoc wrote:Not much of a prophet, are you?
How can you say that I'm not the wizard of Ouzo when I took the dollar-bill bidding game of liar's poker and raised it to a much higher level, huh?thedoc wrote:FYI, you are none of what you claim.bobevenson wrote:I can tell you that I do know who Bob Evenson is, he's Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah, the wizard of Ouzo, and a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic.
Yeah, the level of not being played at all.I did play it once in my mind, and proved that the auditory hallucination saying the ability to double and redouble the score would allow the game to be played at a much higher level was absolutely correct.Arising_uk wrote:
So who is actually playing the game, other than you playing with yourself?bobevenson wrote:I did play it once in my mind, and proved that the auditory hallucination saying the ability to double and redouble the score would allow the game to be played at a much higher level was absolutely correct.Arising_uk wrote:
Good one docthedoc wrote:So who is actually playing the game, other than you playing with yourself?bobevenson wrote:I did play it once in my mind, and proved that the auditory hallucination saying the ability to double and redouble the score would allow the game to be played at a much higher level was absolutely correct.Arising_uk wrote: