Page 4 of 6
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:12 pm
by HexHammer
uwot wrote:HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?
In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:24 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
HexHammer wrote:uwot wrote:HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?
In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Which posts dummy? Let's hear your convoluted logic.
PhilX
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 8:46 pm
by uwot
HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:51 pm
by Obvious Leo
uwot wrote:Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
You're a funny man, uwot.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:53 pm
by HexHammer
uwot wrote:HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
HexHammer wrote:Lacewing wrote:Here's another one for you: Why do you choose to be an arrogant ass? Please do reveal the answer. If we're going to be subjected to it, I think we deserve to hear why it's the best you can come up with.
Because very incompetent people only ruins a buisness, therefore should be fired because they serve no purpose.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 1:02 pm
by uwot
HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:30 pm
by HexHammer
uwot wrote:HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?
Yes, I could, but I won't.
You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Maybe you can get some fool to run a fool's errand and do it.
You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:37 pm
by Harbal
HexHammer wrote:
You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 9:37 pm
by Obvious Leo
HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 9:43 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Obvious Leo wrote:HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
PhilX
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:30 pm
by HexHammer
Harbal wrote:HexHammer wrote:
You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?
Nope, english isn't my first language.
Come let's talk danish and see how well you do.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:32 pm
by HexHammer
Obvious Leo wrote:HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.
Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:34 pm
by HexHammer
Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!
You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:58 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
HexHammer wrote:Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!
You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
Let's add liar to your other stupid qualities, cockhead (for the benefit of my readers, it says BANNED under Hex's name at OPC. You don't see that under my name, shithead).
PhilX
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:05 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
HexHammer wrote:Obvious Leo wrote:HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.
Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
What a dope you must be Hex. I figured out that ofc = of course which isn't the standard abbreviation, loser.
PhilX