E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by Blaggard »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Blaggard wrote:You didn't really get the point. Big wow. ;)
Because you're a LIAR, are you dense as well? Only fools presume to know that one can see their words of jest as such, if they are such, often simply a tactic of further lies. Braggart, no one can truly get you, with your wall of lies, the most they can do, is just believe they do, usually a testament, only, of what they want to believe about themselves. ;-)
Devil's advocate. And yes it is a form of lying, who cares, if it made you listen it worked.
In common parlance, a devil's advocate is someone who, given a certain argument, takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), for the sake of debate or to explore the thought further. In taking this position, the individual taking on the devil's advocate role seeks to engage others in an argumentative discussion process. The purpose of such a process is typically to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure, and to use such information to either improve or abandon the original, opposing position. It can also refer to someone who takes a stance that is seen as unpopular or unconventional, but is actually another way of arguing a much more conventional stance.
You'll get used to it, I'll be using it a lot in future, you might want to think about that. It will of course be something I use sparingly but as long as you talk shit at me, it will be used. If you had any sense though you'd just refrain from talking utter banal judgemental shit at me, but that aint going to happen so let the games commence. The compromise has been offered, and refused, now any lie is fair game. Cry me o' river...
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Blaggard wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Blaggard wrote:You didn't really get the point. Big wow. ;)
Because you're a LIAR, are you dense as well? Only fools presume to know that one can see their words of jest as such, if they are such, often simply a tactic of further lies. Braggart, no one can truly get you, with your wall of lies, the most they can do, is just believe they do, usually a testament, only, of what they want to believe about themselves. ;-)
Devil's advocate. And yes it is a form of lying, who cares, if it made you listen it worked.
In common parlance, a devil's advocate is someone who, given a certain argument, takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), for the sake of debate or to explore the thought further. In taking this position, the individual taking on the devil's advocate role seeks to engage others in an argumentative discussion process. The purpose of such a process is typically to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure, and to use such information to either improve or abandon the original, opposing position. It can also refer to someone who takes a stance that is seen as unpopular or unconventional, but is actually another way of arguing a much more conventional stance.
You'll get used to it, I'll be using it a lot in future, you might want to think about that. It will of course be something I use sparingly but as long as you talk shit at me, it will be used. If you had any sense though you'd just refrain from talking utter banal judgemental shit at me, but that aint going to happen so let the games commence. The compromise has been offered, and refused, now any lie is fair game. Cry me o' river...
And you think you threaten me, somehow, you couldn't be any funnier. I'll be watching for your words of nonsense, exposing you for the fraud you are! ;-)
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by Blaggard »

Not a threat if you wont talk to me person to person but just talk at me, I don't see the need to talk to you person to person. You seem to think I care what you think, but what I care about is how and what you think as it relates to what I actually think, not what you say I think because you never learnt to listen. See at the end of the day I don't care if you are supposedly psychic and know peoples minds before they even speak, if that was true you wouldn't be so laughably wrong all the time. At some point someone told you you are something you are not, and you beleived it, you can either get over yourself and actually use discussion as a two way thing or you can just talk vacuous nonsense at me, I am not sure that you can, you have probably spent too long believing you are the all singing all dancing crap of the world. But you might want to consider this, someone who doesn't listen to people can't be wrong, and likewise cannot learn. You should learn to listen before you speak, not speak before you listen, it will make you a human being not an egotist.

I am sure you have spent your whole life with this sort of biased thinking that somehow you know by magic everyone just by hearing their voice, but it has clearly just not made you anyone worth talking to. You clearly never learnt how to be a person who people listen to, just a person people ignore because your whole life has been a one way street of you are this, lalala fucking la, don't deny it I know I am right.

And again, are you getting the point yet, because I think I have made it clear and I don't think this can get any easier. ;)
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Blaggard wrote:Not a threat if you wont talk to me person to person but just talk at me, I don't see the need to talk to you person to person. You seem to think I care what you think, but what I care about is how and what you think as it relates to what I actually think, not what you say I think because you never learnt to listen. See at the end of the day I don't care if you are supposedly psychic and know peoples minds before they even speak, if that was true you wouldn't be so laughably wrong all the time. At some point someone told you you are something you are not, and you beleived it, you can either get over yourself and actually use discussion as a two way thing or you can just talk vacuous nonsense at me, I am not sure that you can, you have probably spent too long believing you are the all singing all dancing crap of the world. But you might want to consider this, someone who doesn't listen to people can't be wrong, and likewise cannot learn. You should learn to listen before you speak, not speak before you listen, it will make you a human being not an egotist.

I am sure you have spent your whole life with this sort of biased thinking that somehow you know by magic everyone just by hearing their voice, but it has clearly just not made you anyone worth talking to. You clearly never learnt how to be a person who people listen to, just a person people ignore because your whole life has been a one way street of you are this, lalala fucking la, don't deny it I know I am right.

And again, are you getting the point yet, because I think I have made it clear and I don't think this can get any easier. ;)
You think it's bad on here? You should see the bastard we have to put up with on another site I write on. That p**** never 'debates' because he apparently KNOWS what everyone else thinks and never EVER bothers to ask a question. He's an evil little psychopathic trolling shit-head who makes it his life's work to make others as miserable as possible.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Blaggard wrote:Not a threat if you wont talk to me person to person but just talk at me, I don't see the need to talk to you person to person. You seem to think I care what you think, but what I care about is how and what you think as it relates to what I actually think, not what you say I think because you never learnt to listen. See at the end of the day I don't care if you are supposedly psychic and know peoples minds before they even speak, if that was true you wouldn't be so laughably wrong all the time. At some point someone told you you are something you are not, and you beleived it, you can either get over yourself and actually use discussion as a two way thing or you can just talk vacuous nonsense at me, I am not sure that you can, you have probably spent too long believing you are the all singing all dancing crap of the world. But you might want to consider this, someone who doesn't listen to people can't be wrong, and likewise cannot learn. You should learn to listen before you speak, not speak before you listen, it will make you a human being not an egotist.

I am sure you have spent your whole life with this sort of biased thinking that somehow you know by magic everyone just by hearing their voice, but it has clearly just not made you anyone worth talking to. You clearly never learnt how to be a person who people listen to, just a person people ignore because your whole life has been a one way street of you are this, lalala fucking la, don't deny it I know I am right.

And again, are you getting the point yet, because I think I have made it clear and I don't think this can get any easier. ;)
Again simply you appeasing your needs, lies that you tell yourself to make sense of your place in the world! Can't take the fact that someone like me has corrected you and been right about it! What a coward you are, afraid of your own shadow, and then you would attempt hurting people in spite of it.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Blaggard wrote:Not a threat if you wont talk to me person to person but just talk at me, I don't see the need to talk to you person to person. You seem to think I care what you think, but what I care about is how and what you think as it relates to what I actually think, not what you say I think because you never learnt to listen. See at the end of the day I don't care if you are supposedly psychic and know peoples minds before they even speak, if that was true you wouldn't be so laughably wrong all the time. At some point someone told you you are something you are not, and you beleived it, you can either get over yourself and actually use discussion as a two way thing or you can just talk vacuous nonsense at me, I am not sure that you can, you have probably spent too long believing you are the all singing all dancing crap of the world. But you might want to consider this, someone who doesn't listen to people can't be wrong, and likewise cannot learn. You should learn to listen before you speak, not speak before you listen, it will make you a human being not an egotist.

I am sure you have spent your whole life with this sort of biased thinking that somehow you know by magic everyone just by hearing their voice, but it has clearly just not made you anyone worth talking to. You clearly never learnt how to be a person who people listen to, just a person people ignore because your whole life has been a one way street of you are this, lalala fucking la, don't deny it I know I am right.

And again, are you getting the point yet, because I think I have made it clear and I don't think this can get any easier. ;)
You think it's bad on here? You should see the bastard we have to put up with on another site I write on. That p**** never 'debates' because he apparently KNOWS what everyone else thinks and never EVER bothers to ask a question. He's an evil little psychopathic trolling shit-head who makes it his life's work to make others as miserable as possible.
Braggart, case in point of a previous statement of mine!
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by Blaggard »

SoB that was directed at you not me, some people would get that, clearly you didn't.

Oh and incidentally @ VT such bastards are everywhere it's the internet, the self righteous Pope of all reason is a mainstay of any site, in fact there are usually several of the pointless wankers wandering around being God's gift to everyone. Just thank the foresight of forum designers that they left you with an ignore feature, for the particularly egregious self important ****.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Blaggard wrote:SoB that was directed at you not me, some people would get that, clearly you didn't.

Oh and incidentally @ VT such bastards are everywhere it's the internet, the self righteous Pope of all reason is a mainstay of any site, in fact there are usually several of the pointless wankers wandering around being God's gift to everyone. Just thank the foresight of forum designers that they left you with an ignore feature, for the particularly egregious self important ****.
It went over you head, I was there and then some! You also have a problem with sequence, that it suits your fabrications I presume, no matter, as at least I know you as the poser that you are, that's good enough for me! ;-)

Actually though, I was not talking you down in that last, rather I was speaking to you, though you weren't listening, it was about some people. Apparently you missed it, which would seemingly indicate that you are as you blamed Grey Elf, (Greylorn Ell), a non reader of ones posts, before replying, or, I would add, either didn't give a frack or didn't understand it. A contextual slip on your part, better luck next time! Oh and it would have been clear had you paid attention. Review if you care, otherwise forget it. But it just shows that sometimes you jump the gun, blaming people unjustly, a definite character flaw, that one could do better without. Too caught up in ones plight, to become unprecedented, when they arrive. ;-)
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by Blaggard »

Are you done whining at me like a child now?

Do you ever shut the fuck up about shit like ever, because I barely read half the shit you come out with anyway, it's all just indicative of a giant superiority complex.

Why don't you go find a phone directory and run through the list and phone people and tell them what they are and how they think. You really think you can tell someone their life story over the internet, you sad mother fucker. I pity you.

"I was not talking down to you", bollocks you talk down to everyone because you think you are better than everyone else. That's your problem, you never grew up and you think running around the web soap boxing the proles about how you in your infinite wisdom know everything about everyone instantly. You should write a book like El and call it my fantasy that I know peoples very soul from a few brief interweb posts because I am psychic.

You're a sad little fool with an over sized ego. Blow it out your ass you patronising chimp.

Welcome to my ignore list.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI9ImScQGAo

Proof that evolution is false.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Blaggard wrote:Are you done whining at me like a child now?

Do you ever shut the fuck up about shit like ever, because I barely read half the shit you come out with anyway, it's all just indicative of a giant superiority complex.

Why don't you go find a phone directory and run through the list and phone people and tell them what they are and how they think. You really think you can tell someone their life story over the internet, you sad mother fucker. I pity you.

"I was not talking down to you", bollocks you talk down to everyone because you think you are better than everyone else. That's your problem, you never grew up and you think running around the web soap boxing the proles about how you in your infinite wisdom know everything about everyone instantly. You should write a book like El and call it my fantasy that I know peoples very soul from a few brief interweb posts because I am psychic.

You're a sad little fool with an over sized ego. Blow it out your ass you patronising chimp.

Welcome to my ignore list.
Thank you! I feel so much better now. ;-)

Cause I just told my wife last night that I was also through with a one way projector, of a flip flopper, like a fish out of water, that has shown that he will lie, cheat and steal to win, taking things out of context, messing with sequence, anything to further his selfish agenda, of not being questioned, no honor in this one I told her, "41 one indeed," I said, "though by his own admission and as evidenced, probably actually 14!"
You really need some help my friend, as I sense chaos between those ears! Worse than a US presidential candidate with that flip-flopping you are.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by uwot »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:"41 one indeed," I said, "though by his own admission and as evidenced, probably actually 14!"
Do you really think that is worthy of you, Spheres?
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

uwot wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:"41 one indeed," I said, "though by his own admission and as evidenced, probably actually 14!"
Do you really think that is worthy of you, Spheres?
I agree, that it would be more mature to ignore, but does he require a look into his mirror, for some reason. My big concern is that some may believe him, and thus judge me accordingly without thinking, and watching me for themselves, to come to their own conclusion as to whether I'm truly worth listening to or not.

I have respect for Ginkgo as well as others that have always been cordial, respecting ones side, with their approach in discourse, their expressionism. Since I have no real friends here that lets me know I'm valued, to whatever degree they honestly see fit, I do hate being discounted without being fully understood. So my solution, for those who qualify, is a taste of their own medicine, an eye for an eye! I just can't seem to turn the other cheek, not wanting to then be nailed upon a cross. If you catch my drift. Me and my metaphor, not necessarily brilliant, but seemingly SOP for my way of thinking. Obviously having to do with my life, something difficult to get rid of. Fear of course, playing it's part, as fear in the mind killer.

But thanks, I'll take that as a compliment, that without any sort of bias, from me, you believe me to be at least somewhat important. If I remember correctly we have had a little friction, in the distant past, no? I Thank You for being forgiving, and trying to understand someone before giving up on them! :D Or even providing the illusion, if that be the true case, as others apparently do, no need to mention names, as they know themselves!

PEACE, my friend!
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by uwot »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:If I remember correctly we have had a little friction, in the distant past, no?

Given that either of us could start a fight in an empty room, it's entirely possible, but I have no ill feeling towards you.
Blaggard can look after himself and you can kick seven shades of shit out of each other for all I care. But having a pop at someone for something they can't do anything about should be beneath you, Spheres.
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: E=MC2 a philosophical blunder.

Post by Blaggard »

I've no doubt spheres isn't half as bad as I make out, but at the same time he does seem to have some weird idea that somehow he just knows more than everyone else.

I don't like arrogant people. I've said that before, if spheres is of course willing to come off his high horse and talk to me like I am a human being not a human target, he wont remain on ignore forever. I just don't think he is able to. Quid pro quo if he judges me with random bilge that makes no sense and has no relevance to me as a person, I'll do the same. He's been told this, he can either stop talking shit at me, and I will stop making up random shit about him that is clearly completely wrong, or he wont. I don't think he can, he is in a mind set where he believes he can sum up every person at the drop of a hat, because some test told him so. That's his problem not mine. But I am not at home to people who are just giving themselves heirs and graces, that some dip shit told them existed, even though it was clearly utter shit.

You can't know a person by talking to them on line either for a week or a year, you have to know someone face to face to really understand the complexities of what makes someone them. I don't think this prat will ever get that so rather than just talk shit back and forth, and play Devil's advocate it's better for both of our sakes that we just don't talk to each other. Because it is clear we just will never come to an agreement that some people have thoughts of their own that are not magically dictated by some jumped up pillock on the internet who imagines he has super powers no one actually possesses not even Sherlock Holmes because some test told him he did, and he had the misfortune to believe in the same way that he can magically just prescribe all thoughts and actions and ideas to a person as a test can magically just do the same. If ever SoB is willing and able to talk to me like a person not some social wank doll he can just pass of his feculent filth on, we can talk. I just don't think he's capable of it and so, I don't think there's any utility in talking to a person who sees everyone as someone they can cum over.
Post Reply