Philosophy Now Forum

yeah im saying that brighton and in the end the whole world will be a giant evolved form of rome.and even the strongest form of political or religious ideas will be in the end as nothing to this universal jugganaut mighty rome..there are no brakes on jugganaut rome as it weaves its way into the future.

jackles wrote:yeah im saying that brighton and in the end the whole world will be a giant evolved form of rome.and even the strongest form of political or religious ideas will be in the end as nothing to this universal jugganaut mighty rome..there are no brakes on jugganaut rome as it weaves its way into the future.

Yes, I think we all know what you are trying to say.

And yes, I am saying you are wrong.

Why you have chosen Rome is simply based on your egocentric ignorance of history and politics which makes you think Rome was a special case; it was and it is, NOT.

You might just as well say that the whole world will become Babylon.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

jackles wrote:yeah im saying that brighton and in the end the whole world will be a giant evolved form of rome.and even the strongest form of political or religious ideas will be in the end as nothing to this universal jugganaut mighty rome..there are no brakes on jugganaut rome as it weaves its way into the future.

Yes, I think we all know what you are trying to say.

And yes, I am saying you are wrong.

Why you have chosen Rome is simply based on your egocentric ignorance of history and politics which makes you think Rome was a special case; it was and it is, NOT.

You might just as well say that the whole world will become Babylon.

yes but we cannot say that london was babylonised.but we can say that london and babylon are or will be soon romanised and thats the difference.regs jackles

jackles wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

jackles wrote:yeah im saying that brighton and in the end the whole world will be a giant evolved form of rome.and even the strongest form of political or religious ideas will be in the end as nothing to this universal jugganaut mighty rome..there are no brakes on jugganaut rome as it weaves its way into the future.

Yes, I think we all know what you are trying to say.

And yes, I am saying you are wrong.

Why you have chosen Rome is simply based on your egocentric ignorance of history and politics which makes you think Rome was a special case; it was and it is, NOT.

You might just as well say that the whole world will become Babylon.

yes but we cannot say that london was babylonised.but we can say that london and babylon are or will be soon romanised and thats the difference.regs jackles

If you can say babylon is going to be romanised, despite babylon not existing anymore, then any other moron can say Rome will become NewYorked, or that Chipping Snodbury will become Mordored, because what you are saying is meaningless nonsense.

WHilst I thinking about it I think I will Londonise my dog, Because I Bostonised my cat last week and he is jealous.

hobbs ya no im wright on this.even armys and naveys there drill and routeins originate from rome.also town councils and planning departments you name it rome made it what it is today.the planning departments of the world that built the citys of the world they are based on the old roman way of doing stuff.

rome is not a geographic location which people can say that it rome fell.no rome is a semi spiritual system which never fell an its destiny is not to fall .roads .pathments .sewage systems. government.these things never fell they grew and are still growing.individual isms such as communism and fasism are just minor hitches along the way.

it was the destiney of the roman system to be the carrier of universal meaning through the globe.isms are just the husk of the carrier system .the global carrier system being the mighty and unstopable rome.

Nah! You're thinking of the British Empire.

thats right arising you your self are imposing a distinction on the nature of rome.the british empire and rome there is no distinction other than the distinction in the minds of those that cannot see through to the truth.

jackles wrote:thats right arising you your self are imposing a distinction on the nature of rome.the british empire and rome there is no distinction other than the distinction in the minds of those that cannot see through to the truth.

There are major distinctions and one is that Rome carried no further than the Mediterranean basin, the British Empire covered two-thirds of the globe.

You appear reasonably thoughtful, why can you not apply this to learning simple grammar as you look and sound slightly mental in this format.

rome is indistinct it dos not divide its there in the background.

jackles wrote:rome is indistinct it dos not divide its there in the background.

So is Greece, Persia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, etc, etc, etc.

the western world is a modern version of the roman system.the system that got to north and south poles and the moon rome with christian universal knowledge.a system befitting a planet orbitting a sun .

jackles wrote:the western world is a modern version of the roman system.the system that got to north and south poles and the moon rome with christian universal knowledge.a system befitting a planet orbitting a sun .

Only problem jackles was that the official church doctrine at the time said the sun orbited the earth.

minnor details ginkgo and you know it.