Page 4 of 5

Re: Tao

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:06 am
by Arising_uk
Nikolai wrote:Got a ref for that Methodism stuff A_uk?, sounds interesting.
Nope, it was a BBC Radio 4 programme on China.

Re: Tao

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 6:24 pm
by skakos
Only ignorance is true knowledge.

Re: Tao

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 6:34 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.




...that sounds like a GREAT koan.





......................................................
Image







.

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:38 am
by HexHammer
skakos wrote:Only ignorance is true knowledge.
Pure nonsense!

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:25 am
by jackles
ignorance is true knowledge.only a truly wise man can know that fact.the ignorance that is that wise is a part of the relativiy of the system and there for is still in the system and moves not.tao is the unmoving mover.

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:36 am
by Sappho de Miranda
skakos wrote:"Seek the empty, if you wish to be full"...
Anyhooo... my understanding of that little mystic piece of advise is that contentment is easier to achieve without expectations hindering same.

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:32 pm
by jackles
ha.if you where content then you would see clearly that your contentment was indistinguishable from the relativity between objects across the entire universe from the big bang to the present moment.

Re: Tao

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2014 3:14 am
by Sappho de Miranda
jackles wrote:ha.if you where content then you would see clearly that your contentment was indistinguishable from the relativity between objects across the entire universe from the big bang to the present moment.
More accurately, it may mean... It is easier to strive for contentment without expectations of same.

Re: Tao

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:48 pm
by jackles
yes that contentment as you discribe is indistinguishable from object relativity across all time to the present ongoing moment in the event.

Re: Tao

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:14 pm
by skakos
Stop answering in the forum, if you wish to really answer in the forum...

8)

Re: Tao

Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:11 pm
by jackles
yes stop answering in the forum if you realy want to answer in the forum.tao is the real and nonmoving answerer.

Re: Tao

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:55 am
by skakos
Tao seems absurd. And illogical.
But isn't life illogical?

Re: Tao

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:00 am
by jackles
yes it is tao alone that does not move and is certain.all esle is in the yin yan state of flux and uncertainty.tao is nothing that none the less exists out side time and space but also is time and space.everything is tao or a form of tao..tao is nonlocal but forms locations that move.tao is is there for the realativity in all yin yan energy events.

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:30 pm
by skakos
Everything moves.
Everything changes.
And this means that everything stays the same...
Too much change and too much movement can only indicate the illusion of these phenomena.

Re: Tao

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:11 pm
by jackles
everything moves and changes but not tao.tao has never moved or changed.tao is everything in existance all came from this source.but the source of its self is unchangable.all things then are just tempory expressions of the unmoving tao.the mover and the future of the moved thing is tao.