Arising_uk wrote:Nah! BA(Hons) is all I managed with respect to Philososhit.Lakin wrote:And you are worthy of DipShit in Philosophy.
hahahaaaaaaaa
Arising_uk wrote:Nah! BA(Hons) is all I managed with respect to Philososhit.Lakin wrote:And you are worthy of DipShit in Philosophy.
Slow doesn't cover it.Tell you what, because I appear to be slow, why don't you tell me the implication you are trying to raise
And this means what?Lakin wrote:hahahaaaaaaaa![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And this doesn't cover my request.Lakin wrote:Slow doesn't cover it.
No when you said you had an Hons degree in Philosophy it was hahahaaaaaaaahahahaaaaaaaa![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And this means what?
Although I think you mean muhahahahaaaaaa.
Arising_uk wrote:I take it you are expressing disbelief?
Still, it was along-time ago but like I said, in a drawer somewhere.
Better not tell you that I've also got an MSc and DIC you might crack a rib.
What aspect is he not following ?I accuse Bill of not following the Eastern tradition
Like Authur Schopenhauer you mean ?.......whilst cobbling together his own pseudo version.
So you are complaining because he has his own philosophical beliefs ?I accuse Bill of being antithetical towards the Western tradition in his support for illiteracy and his anti-reason stance
Well I would like to know what you have read yourself because, clearly, you do not understand the history of philosphy and the synthesis of western and easternAnd last but not least for a stance based upon, by his own admittance, no(sic) reading of the subject itself.

Sticking on the robe and taking up the bowl, abandoning his possessions, meditating, yoga and growing veg.Lakin wrote:What aspect is he not following ?
Show me where Bill does what Schopenhauer did. Show me where Schopenhauer followed Buddhism.Like Authur Schopenhauer you mean ?
Nope, I argue against his stance that illiteracy is a plus, that words are pointless and useless as a means of expression, that those we call the philosophers are not worth reading, that depression is the source of philosophising, etc, etc.So you are complaining because he has his own philosophical beliefs ?
What synthesis and between which strands? Who are you thinking about, the continentals, Nietzsche? The theological metaphysicians, Huxley? The Moonies?Well I would like to know what you have read yourself because, clearly, you do not understand the history of philosphy and the synthesis of western and eastern strands.
A 2:1 says otherwise. But I admit to it being many moons ago.For someone who claims to have an Hons degree in Philosophy you know very little about the
subject.

That's a powerful indictment against reading, my friend.Bill Wiltrack wrote:I LOVE TO READ.
