Re: Love doesn't happen by chance or does it?
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:51 pm
If there's a chance that love will happen, doesn't it follow that it will happen by chance?
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
2 cents.reasonvemotion wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:09 pm For the majority of us, love is the one part of our lives we believe happens to us solely by chance.
For years passion was not considered a solid basis for marriage until recently.
Here we must exercise caution. When two people instantly fall in love, they are in love with an idealised concept of each other, which eventually, nearly always, ends in disaster.
How many of us would put in the effort needed to keep a relationship going when one person cheats on the other?
What about physical attraction. Yes. It is important, but too much of a good thing, can turn into a bad thing and instead of love it is lust. I chuckle here as some may disagree vehemently with this.
Does it make sense to enter into an aranged marriage where both parties can learn to love each other gradually and travel on solid ground.
I dont believe we have one person only for us. Our soulmate. That is for the poet and his/her muse.
Should we wait around hoping for our true love to happen upon us.
Should we use our common sense and plan for it, like we plan for a career, or anything else, reject the fairytale aspect of it.
Some are quite content without it.
very true!!! i like big butts (small top - so uber pears) - when lust is there, the mind becomes even more clouded.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:51 pm As some wag put it: 'love ain't nuthin' but lust misspelled.'
Way too much attention is paid to gland-based longings/appetites.
artisticsolution wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:20 am
I see falling in love as an aesthetic thing we do.
for me lust is animal/appearance (hips for me).artisticsolution wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:20 am Passion is a wonderful thing...it is sublime...but it isn't real...it's all about appearances and by appearances I do not mean looks as in she is hot or he is not, I mean appearances on a deeper level ....
yes concur fully!!!!!!artisticsolution wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:20 am
There is absolutely nothing wrong in loving a man and seeing his faults too. In fact, that is the basis of truly loving a person.
I've know a couple like that.Kayla wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2013 4:52 pm i know an old couple who had a very long and happy marriage - over 60 years
they told me that they met in grade 1 and knew that they wanted to marry each other the day they met
and in their case they were in love way before sex entered their thoughts at all
they think that is what made it work for them
disagree here.
indeed so.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:11 amIt's hard to meet people these days.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:At least you are honest.Dalek Prime wrote:I find it easier to go online for it ie. prostitute myself.
not seen that movie - think Burton was an overactor myslef (i.e. Heston/Shatner) (Taylor was better actress IMO). when you mentioned of "lost son" my mind went to a movie with better actors (IMO).Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:20 pmThey are bitter because they lost a son; possibly fictional. Either lost or not capable of having children.Walker wrote:I’ve obviously stepped in your milieu.Hobbes' Choice wrote: Both Burton and Taylor were great actors.
But do you know why their characters are so angry with life?
Were you paying attention?
You have the floor, Mr. Film Critic.
Do tell.
They are not in a relationship that is going to fall apart. They are in a game that only they can share, and understand, a bond that none can come between. They are in for the long haul.
you know your movies and have the mind to see the message.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:42 am Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf (1966): Killing Martha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWgIOb_U2Hc
And then he landed flat in a huckleberry bush!
Brilliant naturalism. Gritty black and white. Shadows. Camera too close to slightly distort facial features. Loud. Brassy! On the edge. If only they had the HD technology so we could see the pores in the flesh. Surely, everyone has some dim human memory. Quite artful.
i think all is by chance - good or ill.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:51 pm If there's a chance that love will happen, doesn't it follow that it will happen by chance?
The opportunities, certainly. What we make of them is up to us, within reason.gaffo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:39 ami think all is by chance - good or ill.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:51 pm If there's a chance that love will happen, doesn't it follow that it will happen by chance?
IMO of course.
Science permits chance.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:25 amThe opportunities, certainly. What we make of them is up to us, within reason.gaffo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:39 ami think all is by chance - good or ill.Dalek Prime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 5:51 pm If there's a chance that love will happen, doesn't it follow that it will happen by chance?
IMO of course.
Hear hear! Chance? Chemicals? Magic? It doesn't matter. Animals sometimes hook up. Hurrah hurrah.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:51 pmWay too much attention is paid to gland-based longings/appetites.
That'd the thing that gets me, though. Yes, we are animals. But what's the point then of having a rational brain if we don't allow it to control our base instincts, or at least attempt it? Or are we satisfied we are no better than rabbits?Greta wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:47 amHear hear! Chance? Chemicals? Magic? It doesn't matter. Animals sometimes hook up. Hurrah hurrah.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:51 pmWay too much attention is paid to gland-based longings/appetites.
Still, for romantics the need to have someone trustworthy and compatible over the long term with which to share costs, body fluids and heat is essential to survive. Still, eventually the hormones will settle down and sanity gradually dawns![]()