Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:

Bill Wiltrack wrote:Are you bored?

I'm bored of your continual evasion when questioned about your billshit. I'm bored of how you avoid any questioning of your thoughts by your posting and reposting of puerile clips.

Well said foghorn. The lad from Alabama [or is it henly.] takes the food basket.
The number of clips say to me.. 'this guy has no thoughts of his own.'
I knew a guy who repeated every clever aphorism in human knowing.. he sounded good.. but was an empty vessel.
I use quotes and aphorisms to underline. not define.

I use the brain i was graced with.. not well but i use it.
try it sometime billy.

.


Yeah. No, I agree.


Both of you are two peas in a pod.






........................................................................................


.................................................................................................................................................................................................made for each other.





.

Dont ever say that again.
These peas are from different phylum . let alone pods.
I mean i was corrected on spelling parliment without an '"a".
That just anal. chickens are so uppity all that head bobbing and wing flapping.

Boy.. i say boy . You hearing me ..

.



That just anal.




.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I think you are being diverting. Justifiably so.

Go on then, tell me why you think I'm justified? You won't be able to, you know why? Because I'm not the one who diverts any attempt to discuss what I say. I'm only guessing but I think you do this because you fear thinking about your thoughts will damage the persona you attempt to portray here, that or its as you say, you don't know what you say so can't talk about it when someone asks you about the things that you say.

I'm seeing posts like yours as being boring now.

Your insights into your feelings are immaterial to me.

You submit your opinion and that is fine but your delivery is not fresh.

Thats because I'm not a marketing man nor a propagandist.

Your attempts at being offensive are just so shallow now...

Any offense comes from having to deal with someone who refuses to discuss what they state upon a philosophy forum.

...just the way I see it now.

Once again, I'm more interested in hearing your reasons for what you say rather than your 'feelings'.

Things will change.

I doubt it.

Either you chose to drive the truck of change or you are run over by it.

You are so limited, you can choose not to be in the road, you can be in charge of the stop-lights, you can buy caltrops, etc, etc, etc.

That you think you are in charge of this change is laughable, those in charge are those who build the sites and choose the images and words that you then reuse to 'express' yourself. Me, I like to use language as its free to all who wish to use their 'brain' or mind.

Hjarloprillar wrote:Dont ever say that again.
These peas are from different phylum . let alone pods. ...

Yeah! You listen to the weird alien chick, we're different pod people.

I mean i was corrected on spelling parliment without an '"a".

You can't spell parliament without an "a".

That just anal. chickens are so uppity all that head bobbing and wing flapping.

And struttin' an' doodlin'.

Boy.. i say boy . You hearing me ..

Wot's up duck?

.



This is the way I picture both of you:





.............................................................










.............................................................






...can you see the underlying pea shape?







.

Two anuses no less! *Knock* *Knock*

You really should find a psychoanalytic forum they'd just love you.

.



Wait a minute...THOSE ARE anuses?


That escalated quickly.

Your focus & assessment is veeeeery telling.




Thank you for opening-up.






.

Thats right Bill, keep the persona up.

Who is that blonde dish?

You know those 'brains' of yours, you should use them to read the titles of the gifs you post.

//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-c7xvVonycnI/UVMu5FNF0rI/AAAAAAAABs0/1MNbY3iKyEA/s590/buttmonkey.gif

Still, since you have no-self, don't know what you think and your life is one big accident I'm not surprised your unconscious talks for you.

.








...................................................................





Thank you for your response.





.

My pleasure. You can look forward to many more.

.









.....................................................................................................








A while ago I recommended that you start to begin threads, to heal and strengthen the persona whose credibility has been completely destroyed.


I haven't forgotten.




You have trusted me in the past to guide you through the fascinating real-life applications of real philosophy.


Keep the facade but continue to trust me in this non-literal world.


I won't betray you. I haven't yet.




You will understand.










.

*Yawn* pentja vue.

If I make the value judgement that "I am nothing", then I am implying that there is "something" which defines value, against which I am measuring my life. This "something" therefore has to exist, in order for "nothing" to have any meaning. The emotional force of declaring that "I am nothing" suggests an expectation that I really ought to be something, and I have discovered to my horror that, in fact, I am nothing. But if the fact of my discovery leads me to conclude that I was deluded in thinking that I ever could be something, then my conclusion dissolves into meaninglessness, since the conclusion of my nothingness only has meaning in the light of the legitimacy of my expectation. Therefore I refute myself when I say "I am nothing".

Ergo, I am not nothing. And neither are you.

The question then is: what is this "something" that gives us value?