Re: What should religion be based on?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:05 pm
There is only the real creator of the universe ( the true God ) : you can speak to him (but that is one-sided)
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Do you realize that if you had a better grasp of English grammar and language, your posts wouldn't sound like you were talking in riddles and they would be easier to understand.manden wrote:I said , the real creator of the universe ( the true God ) has created everything ! Not that what you say !
I could recognize at his creation that the real creator of the universe (more of himself not recognizable) really exists , because the real creator
has made this possibility for every human being , and I could reach the necessary ' human - moral ' level , which is necessary to recognize his
existence .
I understand that your problem is poor cognitive abilities, you don't understand what you are thinking, so you can't explain it.manden wrote:What is necessary , can be understood .
How have you reached that conclusion? I too have trouble following manden's rather didactic and broken English, but I see no reason to blame her/his cognitive abilities for that. S/he isn't saying much, granted; but that is in no small measure down to the combative and unconstructive dialogue in which you and Hobby are engaging her. I think a little more charity on your part is called for.thedoc wrote:I understand that your problem is poor cognitive abilities ...
mickthinks wrote: I think a little more charity on your part is called for.
mickthinks wrote:How have you reached that conclusion? I too have trouble following manden's rather didactic and broken English, but I see no reason to blame her/his cognitive abilities for that. S/he isn't saying much, granted; but that is in no small measure down to the combative and unconstructive dialogue in which you and Hobby are engaging her. I think a little more charity on your part is called for.thedoc wrote:I understand that your problem is poor cognitive abilities ...
By reading her posts.mickthinks wrote: How have you reached that conclusion?
By your own admission, we know that you find her posts hard to understand. My question is, how have you decided your failure to understand is evidence of her lack of "cognitive abilities" rather than, say, the combination of her poor English and your lack of patience?thedoc wrote:By reading her posts.mickthinks wrote:How have you reached that conclusion?
SO what sort of a thing is god?manden wrote:I said , the real creator of the universe ( the true God ) has created everything ! Not that what you say !
I could recognize at his creation that the real creator of the universe (more of himself not recognizable) really exists , because the real creator
has made this possibility for every human being , and I could reach the necessary ' human - moral ' level , which is necessary to recognize his
existence .
I see that you don't have good reading comprehension, I didn't say that I didn't understand what she was trying to say but that she wasn't saying it very well. If she doesn't say it very well, she isn't thinking about it very clearly and thus is not able to communicate it very clearly. If you are having difficulty with that, I will type more slowly for you, that is if I respond to you at all.mickthinks wrote:By your own admission, we know that you find her posts hard to understand. My question is, how have you decided your failure to understand is evidence of her lack of "cognitive abilities" rather than, say, the combination of her poor English and your lack of patience?thedoc wrote:By reading her posts.mickthinks wrote:How have you reached that conclusion?
More of manden is not recognisable. This is by no means the only thread on this topic and I think we've seen all there is to see, which is sweet fuck-all.mickthinks wrote: S/he isn't saying much, granted;