Christianity

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:26 pm
AJ wrote: ... it fit into a system of description known as The Great Chain of Being.
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 9:40 pmMedieval and Catholic. It has zero to do with the Bible or Christianity.
Oh no, not 'zero' and by no means zero.
Yep, zero.

You won't find any "Great Chain of Being" or anything like it in the Bible. Sorry.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:32 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 9:40 pm But I see you're so in love with conventional historicism you can't see past it. So I don't know what I can tell you, except that what you're saying bears no resemblance to Christ or His word.
I do not think you have enough clarity
No, I've got it. I just think it's wrong.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:36 pm You place me in a way in the position of having to *argue against the core stories of Christianity*
No, you put yourself there.

You keep claiming things that the Bible never said.

Do you want me not to tell you when you're so wrong? Would you rather stay wrong? :shock:
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

I asked you:
So let me ask, for example, do you accept as truth that man fell, through some sort of error, from a heavenly realm of Divine protection down into a world whose ruler is said to be Satan, the chief fallen Angel?

Is that story true through & through? Is it literally true? Is it allegorically true?

The moment of truth has come Immanuel Can! Answer!
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:57 pmWhere, on Earth, do you get this narrative?

It's nothing I've ever heard of. "Man fell from heaven?" The Bible doesn't say that. Do you know what "Adam" means? :shock:

And what is a "realm of Divine Protection"?

Moreover, mankind fell through sin, not through a mere "error."

And man was already in the world, so couldn't "fall down into" any world.

??????
What you do here is typical and I think crafty (somewhat devious) but dishonest. You know, and you did understand, that the Picture of the Genesis story is that of freshly minted man, with his then minted woman, living in a special, protected space known as the Garden of Eden. And you certainly understood that it was error (a mistake, a bad choice, disobedience) provoked and instigated by the demonic entity Satan, that brought about the exile from the Garden:
According to the Bible, a flaming sword (Hebrew: להט החרב lahat chereb or literally "flame of the whirling sword" Hebrew: להט החרב המתהפכת lahaṭ haḥereb hammithappeket) was entrusted to the cherubim by God to guard the gates of Paradise after Adam and Eve were banished
The 'realm of protection of Divine protection' was the protected (and deathless) realm of the Garden, lost when the sin or error or disobedience occurred. But all this you knew of course.
Is that story true through & through? Is it literally true? Is it allegorically true?

The moment of truth has come Immanuel Can! Answer!
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:59 pmYou won't find any "Great Chain of Being" or anything like it in the Bible. Sorry.
There is no need to feel sorrow.

You certainly find a cosmogony in Genesis!

I demonstrated to you that early Hebrews had a cosmology and a cosmogony. I did not say, and I do not say, that it was exactly the same picture, I said and I say that these pictures are related in kind and in sort. I presented you with a page from contemporary Jewish scholarship where this cosmogony is described in some detail. This type of concept-system is of a sort with that of The Great Chain of Being, and in this case indicates the origin of the Genesis mythology (pertaining to the creation of heaven and earth):
The former [a great body of water] is conceived of as a monstrous dragon, Tiamat (= ), which, in the epitome given by Berosus, is represented as the "primeval woman," with whom Bel cohabits, splitting her into two halves, one of which becomes the earth and the other the sky, in characteristic reflection of Babylon's climate, and of the spring sun piercing the waters at the end of the winter's rainy season. Stories about Tiamat have been found as far back as the fourth millennium B.C. The narrative, as recovered from the tablets, begins by recording that "long since, when above the heaven had not been named, and earth was also without name [i.e., non-existent] there was only primeval ocean-flood." This is personified as a male (Apsu) and a female (Tiamat). The gods, which had not yet arisen, were then made: Tiamat was their mother. Hatred of the new-born light causes her to rebel against the higher deities. Some of the gods side with her, and to aid her in her fight she produces huge monsters. Marduk offers to punish her, on condition that the supreme rule over heaven and earth be accordedhim after the victory. He rides to the combat in his war-chariot, and, meeting Tiamat, kills her by forcing open her mouth, which he fills with the hurricane that cuts her in two from within, and puts her crew in chains. He then divides her carcass: out of one part he makes heaven; out of the other, earth. The following is the order in which Creation is said to have been successively called forth by Marduk: (1) the heaven; (2) the heavenly bodies; (3) the earth; (4) the plants; (5) the animals; (6) man.
You are right: there is no reference to The Great Chain of Being in the Bible. But that is not what I asserted! What I said is that those people of that early time had a cosmological and cosmogonic worldpicture that corresponds to TGCOB.

And what you have done here, again, is to trickily skirt the core of what I presented by bringing in other pseudo-objections.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

“It is only when we realize that life is taking us nowhere that it begins to have meaning.”
-- P.D. Ouspensky
When a person needs to acquire meaning from Christianity or another ancient tradition initiating with a conscious source, they must become disappointed. A person must experience that life is taking us nowhere. As Gurdjieff told Ouspensky:
I say for instance that a religious person should be disappointed in religion. This does not mean that they should lose their faith. On the contrary, it means being "disappointed" in the teaching and the methods only, realizing that the religious teaching he or she knows is not enough for them, can lead nowhere. All [authentic] religious teachings consist of two parts, the visible and the hidden.

To be disappointed in religion means being disappointed in the visible, and to feel the necessity for finding the hidden and unknown part of religion.
How many when discussing Christianity are content with the superficial to satisfy their need for meaning? How many after being disappointed are drawn to the hidden unknown part of religion and experience it? What is our attitude toward them? Can these people both intellectually and emotionally experience the essence of and the purpose of Christianity?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:59 pm
Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:26 pm
AJ wrote: ... it fit into a system of description known as The Great Chain of Being.
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 9:40 pmMedieval and Catholic. It has zero to do with the Bible or Christianity.
Oh no, not 'zero' and by no means zero.
Yep, zero.

You won't find any "Great Chain of Being" or anything like it in the Bible. Sorry.
You don't see any similarity between the days of creation described in Genesis one and the Great Chain of Being?
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 1:14 am I asked you:
So let me ask, for example, do you accept as truth that man fell, through some sort of error, from a heavenly realm of Divine protection down into a world whose ruler is said to be Satan, the chief fallen Angel?

Is that story true through & through? Is it literally true? Is it allegorically true?

The moment of truth has come Immanuel Can! Answer!
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:57 pmWhere, on Earth, do you get this narrative?

It's nothing I've ever heard of. "Man fell from heaven?" The Bible doesn't say that. Do you know what "Adam" means? :shock:

And what is a "realm of Divine Protection"?

Moreover, mankind fell through sin, not through a mere "error."

And man was already in the world, so couldn't "fall down into" any world.

??????
What you do here is typical and I think crafty
Wrongly. I can tell from this that you've never read Genesis, though.
Is that story true through & through? Is it literally true? Is it allegorically true?
The Genesis story?

Literally, of course. But not the strange thing you were talking about.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 1:30 am
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:59 pmYou won't find any "Great Chain of Being" or anything like it in the Bible. Sorry.
You certainly find a cosmogony in Genesis!
Not "The Great Chain of Being." That's a Medieval Catholic fiction. It has nothing to do with Scripture.
You are right: there is no reference to The Great Chain of Being in the Bible.
Right.
But that is not what I asserted!
But nothing else is remotely relevant. So I really can't say what you think you were asserting.

You seem to think I owe something to the mythologies of traditions that have nothing to do with Scripture.

I don't.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by attofishpi »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 5:08 am You seem to think I owe something to the mythologies of traditions that have nothing to do with Scripture.
What if God decided to remain a Jew, after he let Jesus get crucified. Maybe God (God forbid) is still a Jew.
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

IC wrote: You won't find any "Great Chain of Being" or anything like it in the Bible. Sorry.
AJ responded: You certainly find a cosmogony in Genesis!
Immanuel Can wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 5:08 amNot "The Great Chain of Being." That's a Medieval Catholic fiction. It has nothing to do with Scripture.
IC wrote: You seem to think I owe something to the mythologies of traditions that have nothing to do with Scripture. I don't.
So my suggestion is that we linger here for a moment. Here, some soundtrack. 👍

Let us remind ourselves what we are talking about. I will summarize. Christianity is a religious view that deeply involves a worldpicture, a description of the world and of the kosmos. If Genesis is taken as the Central Story, the original story, the Origin Story, is is easy as pie to recognize in it a mythological, a mytho-religious, set of assertions about 'the world'. About existence, about being.

When one examines The Story -- and I indicated this by referring to the Jewish religious site (the Jewish Encyclopedia) -- one easily sees that the Origin Story depicted in Genesis has itself an origin -- likely in Babylon and lost in *the mists of time*.

If there are four major centers or currents that inform our European traditions (Judea, Greece, Rome, Alexandria) Judea brings to the table, as it were, an extremely ancient line or current of connection to Egypt and Babylon and back through these cultures, and these regions, into some of the most foundational cultures, civilizations, social organizations, mythologies and worldpictures.

These worldpictures are all parts-and-parcels of descriptions of pre-scientific world descriptions. They explain how the world came to be; who created it; and what is the place of humankind in the created world. They are cosmological and cosmogonical. All people, all so-called primitive people devise these stories. There is not a way around it when you examine the issue. And what is the issue? That we have to explain to ourselves what *all this* is; where it comes from; why we are here; and what we are supposed to do.

Cosmologies, therefore, have an explanatory and orienting function.

Now, with that said, let us turn the *lens of examination around* to examine our own explanatory system. This is where it gets weird but interesting. I will offer a quickly drawn picture of the Christian Story even though everyone knows it. God created Heaven and Earth and placed a man in a divinely created Garden. Then he took a part of man and created woman. There, they were to live (one presumes for all eternity) under the protection of God. But Satan entered in and corrupted the will and obedience of this Primeval Couple. As punishment they were evicted from the primeval garden and an Angel with some weird spinning sword was sent to block any attempt at *return*.

And thus, cast out (I used a prepositional term 'down') from the Garden, Man & Woman as humankind were thrust into another sort of world, a world in which death reigned. A world (according to the story) of trials and tribulations. But also a world that had a Story Line. That Story line has to do with movement through the world -- Exodus in different forms -- but leading to an eventual reconciliation with the offended God who established the punishment in the first place (exile essentially and the couple's alienation from God through disobedience).

That reconciliation took place through God's own effort and decision, since it is asserted that Man cannot do it on his own, through an act of intervention in the kosmos, in the world, and in the worldpicture: God sent 'his son' down into the world to 'save' the world. However, this only led to another dimension to The Story (a cosmic set-back). The Savior, who would have righted everything had He the chance to do so, was adamantly resisted and opposed by Man. But behind this resistance and opposition, that is the one doing it, the one leading the effort, is Satan himself. Once, aligned with God and his favorite, somehow this servant-angel 'fell'.

And where did he fall to? He fell from a celestial dimension or domain -- the angelical world of non-incarnate celestial being -- down into our World. So, as the Story goes, we all live in Satan's Kingdom. Here, Satan has an unusually free reign.

Now it is true that the worldpicture of The Great Chain of Being is a conceptual picture, a diagram really, of the Cosmos. Heaven above, the Earth below, a celestial event similar to a palace intrigue and power-struggle, and a resulting 'fall' and 'banishment' of one of God's hyper-intelligent angelical creations down into the density of earth and matter. But this picture is intimately, thoroughly and in fact completely presented in the Christian Story. That is to say that the Story, essentially, is precisely what is described in the (embellished and developed) worldpicture that was presented through TGCOB.

In order to understand Christianity -- this is what I say -- we have to understand the origin of the Christian concept in the 'former worldview', the former metaphysical picture!

But here we are now -- we are Moderns! The former worldpicture, if it were let's say a balloon -- had been punctured. Or to use Nietzsche's way of presenting it (through a picture) someone came along with an eraser and, literally, wiped away the picture!
How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What did we do when we unchained the earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving now? Away from all suns? Are we not perpetually falling? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there any up or down left? Are we not straying as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is it not more and more night coming on all the time? Must not lanterns be lit in the morning? Do we not hear anything yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God? Do we not smell anything yet of God's decomposition? Gods too decompose.
So let us ask ourselves -- In what World do we now live? What is the World? What is Existence? What is Being? What are we? And what does it mean that we have awareness and consciousness?

So here is my summation: Obviously (except to IC who performs the role of God's own idiot-child) all of us, because of our modern perspective, when we examine the Story we easily distinguish that it is a Story. This does not mean that there is no 'truth' in the Story if we recognize it as story! What it does mean is that something very very strange happened. A worldpicture was overturned. And yet, and yet! the story is still there, the narrative is still there, it still *operates*, and some hold to it adamantly and literally (IC is a bona fide Christian literalist and a true fundamentalist) while others veer away from the literalness.

But in this veered-away zone, and it is a question of degrees, that is where we reside! So the metaphor of 'dusk' in which a former view, clear and bold as day, now recedes into shadow -- this provides us with a picture of where we are. That is, in the sense of *our locality*.

And when I say *locality* I do not mean the rock on which we stand. I mean our view, our perspective, our worldpicture, our 'metaphysical dream of the world', and the worldpicture we have and organize our sense of what the World is and what our place in it is.
Last edited by Alexis Jacobi on Sun May 08, 2022 2:09 pm, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by attofishpi »

Careful IC...one might consider this Alexis Jacobi might be one of God's mates (a Jew - not that there's anything wrong with that, unless he is a gay Jew with a foreskin).
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 5:06 am Wrongly. I can tell from this that you've never read Genesis, though.
Actually I had just begun to read Genesis again a week or two back. In the KJ version.
AJ asks: Is that story true through & through? Is it literally true? Is it allegorically true?
IC answers: The Genesis story? Literally, of course. But not the strange thing you were talking about.
Just above I presented the Christian story in brief. Did I get it right or did I get it wrong?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by attofishpi »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 2:49 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 5:06 am Wrongly. I can tell from this that you've never read Genesis, though.
Actually I had just begun to read Genesis again a week or two back. In the KJ version.
Did you start getting a bit dismayed when this chap started talking the heavens and the earth into existence?

OR

Did you start questioning EVERYTHING?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

In the Church, considered as a social organism, the mysteries inevitably degenerate into beliefs. Simone Weil

Yes, this is what happens. The human need from the depth of their being to experience wholeness is gradually being lost to the egoistic need to establish beliefs. The mind closes for those who adopt this path. Yet there are those who sacrifice beliefs to contemplate the mysteries which lead to wholeness. Sacred scripture opens a person to contemplation yet modern interpretation closes it into opposing fragmentation or beliefs.
Post Reply