Addendum:
'serious philosophers' - a kind of faux superiority
from below posing. It means that you said something that seems to fit his image of what a philosopher might say, so it is wrong and too abstract. When he is abstract and uses terms like dasein, that's not being the negative version of a serious philosopher, that's being, metaphorically, a working class hero bringing heart and manual tools to help a fellow traveller.
'intellectual contraption' - a sentence with abstractions or generalities used by someone other than iambiguous. It's a bad thing to write one of these as a non-Iambiguous person.
'objectivist' - officially, this means anyone thinking they've got an objective answer to how to live, morally or even practically. In practice, anyone who doesn't join him in the precise despairs he has. Or anyone not adding enough disclaimers when they express their values or opinions (see objectivism above for the related noun)
'shameless' - an appeal to seeing someone as objectively bad made by a nihilist moral anti-realist.
'fractured and fragmented' - annoyed at not getting 100% certainty so he can make a choice. Entails others have the responsibility to lift him up in a very Eric Berne-like game.
In the game of "Why Don't You -- Yes But," players begin by bemoaning a problem and inviting others to suggest solutions, all of which will be shot down. The real object, Berne writes, is "to demonstrate that no one can give them an acceptable suggestion."
Meaning: no one is living acceptably if they aren't F & F to his degree.
'reduce' - verb used in mindreading claims about his power over other minds and what their internal states must be.
'disturb' - verb used in mindreading claims tabout his power over other minds and what their internal states must be.
So the drag is a kind of dress-up as a....
humble working class hero penetrating a realm of serious elite philosophers who are in tremendous denial and who cannot face as bravely as he does the metaphysical conundrums of this universe. A salt of the earth autodidact picked on, not for his inability to read what he responds to disparagingly, not for his hijacking of threads, not for his generalized insults and mindreading, his endless repetition and cutting and pasting of the same sentences for nearly two decades now, regardless of whether they fit the posts they are responding to or not, nor his hypocrisy, passive-aggressiveness and stubborn cluelessness, but rather because no one has ever considered human suffering and unpleasant metaphysical possibilities until he came along. Not the narcissism of his behavior, but rather his undeniable bravery and Joseph Campbellian rawness triggers everyone. So, he never needs to take any criticism of his behavior seriously at all because people can't actually be correct about why they are reacting negatively to him, and even though they've been reacting to him this way for decades on different forums.
Now that' high level drag. And it surely takes more effort to put on than even the most baroque RuPaul extravanganza.
Good one