Page 27 of 30
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:23 pm
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:44 pm
Because 'you' are so CLOSED you have not even considered, let alone been able to fathom, that there is absolute NOTHING that even could, to you, be shown to imply that I am right about "this 'Truth' stuff".
Are you at all aware that it is impossible to show some thing to some one who believes otherwise?
Even the very Truth Itself can not be SEEN by a person who believes It does not exist.
'you', "atla", are a prime example and living proof of this FACT.
'you' are the actual PROOF that I NEED to provide and SHOW that I am Right "about this 'Truth' stuff", as you call 'it'.
The Truth is HERE-NOW in front of ALL of 'you', human beings. It IS ALWAYS. Just some of 'you' are NOT OPEN to SEEING It.
Case still OPEN.
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Do you always perceive EVERY one in the group, which you align people to, are the exact same?
Who do you propose are non aboriginals?
What does 'aboriginal' mean, to you?
What 'difficulties' are you referring to exactly?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:27 pm
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:23 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:44 pm
Because 'you' are so CLOSED you have not even considered, let alone been able to fathom, that there is absolute NOTHING that even could, to you, be shown to imply that I am right about "this 'Truth' stuff".
Are you at all aware that it is impossible to show some thing to some one who believes otherwise?
Even the very Truth Itself can not be SEEN by a person who believes It does not exist.
'you', "atla", are a prime example and living proof of this FACT.
'you' are the actual PROOF that I NEED to provide and SHOW that I am Right "about this 'Truth' stuff", as you call 'it'.
The Truth is HERE-NOW in front of ALL of 'you', human beings. It IS ALWAYS. Just some of 'you' are NOT OPEN to SEEING It.
Case still OPEN.
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Do you always perceive EVERY one in the group, which you align people to, are the exact same?
Who do you propose are non aboriginals?
What does 'aboriginal' mean, to you?
What 'difficulties' are you referring to exactly?
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:55 pm
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:23 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:44 pm
Because 'you' are so CLOSED you have not even considered, let alone been able to fathom, that there is absolute NOTHING that even could, to you, be shown to imply that I am right about "this 'Truth' stuff".
Are you at all aware that it is impossible to show some thing to some one who believes otherwise?
Even the very Truth Itself can not be SEEN by a person who believes It does not exist.
'you', "atla", are a prime example and living proof of this FACT.
'you' are the actual PROOF that I NEED to provide and SHOW that I am Right "about this 'Truth' stuff", as you call 'it'.
The Truth is HERE-NOW in front of ALL of 'you', human beings. It IS ALWAYS. Just some of 'you' are NOT OPEN to SEEING It.
Case still OPEN.
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Do you always perceive EVERY one in the group, which you align people to, are the exact same?
Who do you propose are non aboriginals?
What does 'aboriginal' mean, to you?
What 'difficulties' are you referring to exactly?
And do you have difficulties with communicating with Aboriginals?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:42 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:27 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:23 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:16 pm
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Do you always perceive EVERY one in the group, which you align people to, are the exact same?
Who do you propose are non aboriginals?
What does 'aboriginal' mean, to you?
What 'difficulties' are you referring to exactly?
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
If you do not clarify what you are saying and/or do not define the words you use, from your perspective, then you will keep having as much difficulty as you are now obtaining true and right answers. Therefore, you will keep remaining as well uninformed as you are right now.
Also, remember it is YOU who has absolute difficulty in communicating what it is that you actually mean.
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:45 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:55 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:23 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:16 pm
Do other Aboriginals also have the same difficulties as you in trying to communicate with non-Aboriginals?
Do you always perceive EVERY one in the group, which you align people to, are the exact same?
Who do you propose are non aboriginals?
What does 'aboriginal' mean, to you?
What 'difficulties' are you referring to exactly?
And do you have difficulties with communicating with Aboriginals?
I have difficulty being understood by any person who is as closed as you are.
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:33 am
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:45 am
person who is as closed as you are.
Making a major assumption there
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:59 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:33 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:45 am
person who is as closed as you are.
Making a major assumption there
Do you believe that you are open?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:12 am
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:59 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:33 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 3:45 am
person who is as closed as you are.
Making a major assumption there
Do you believe that you are open?
Do you assume you could tell if I was?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:40 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:12 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:59 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:33 am
Making a major assumption there
Do you believe that you are open?
Do you assume you could tell if I was?
No.
I KNOW if you are open or not.
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:55 am
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:40 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:12 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:59 am
Do you believe that you are open?
Do you assume you could tell if I was?
No.
I KNOW if you are open or not.
And what if you KNOW wrong?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:59 am
by Skepdick
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 4:31 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:49 pm
WHEN did you become OPEN?
It is not a question about when you become OPEN.
Which is why I didn't ask you when I became OPEN. You can't possibly know when I became OPEN. Only I know the answer to that question.
What I asked you was when you became OPEN. And perhaps an even better question yet: have you become OPEN yet?
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 4:31 pm
The question is when did you become CLOSED?
I was born CLOSED, then I learned to become OPEN.
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 4:31 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:49 pmWhat were you before you became OPEN?
Again, this question does not work.
You seem CLOSED to the idea that it does work.
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:37 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:55 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:40 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:12 am
Do you assume you could tell if I was?
No.
I KNOW if you are open or not.
And what if you KNOW wrong?
Then that will come to light.
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:40 am
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:37 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:55 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:40 am
No.
I KNOW if you are open or not.
And what if you KNOW wrong?
Then that will come to light.
And what if you KNOW this wrong too?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:44 am
by Age
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:37 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 9:55 am
And what if you KNOW wrong?
Then that will come to light.
And what if you KNOW this wrong too?
And what IF you explained WHY you BELIEVE that only around 12,000 years ago was when the "first humans" existed?
Re: Göbekli Tepe
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:47 am
by Atla
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:44 am
Atla wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 10:37 am
Then that will come to light.
And what if you KNOW this wrong too?
And what IF you explained WHY you BELIEVE that only around 12,000 years ago was when the "first humans" existed?
By your definition of "belief", I have only one belief, and not the above.
Nor did I use the word "human" in the sense you think I used it.