the limits of fascism
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
So then why did you dismiss the BBC and HNS with "because taxpayers aren't calling the shots."?
Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
You ought to read the thread from the start...you're so off the mark about my positions, I'm startin' to get embarrassed for you.
It seems whatever your definition of "socialism" you deem it necessary that taxpayers must be calling the shots. Otherwise it's not socialism.
Nope. Wrong.
Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
You ought to read the thread from the start...you're so off the mark about my positions, I'm startin' to get embarrassed for you.
It seems whatever your definition of "socialism" you deem it necessary that taxpayers must be calling the shots. Otherwise it's not socialism.
Nope. Wrong.
Re: the limits of fascism
Good thing the brits have sanctioned the BBC and NHS then, so it's neither slavery nor theft.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:05 pm So then why did you dismiss the BBC and HNS with "because taxpayers aren't calling the shots."?
Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
You can buy your TV license online. Voluntarily and everything.
Shame, Harry. You seem to be very confused (as usual).
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: the limits of fascism
>Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
That speaks to the necessity of an opt-out and has nothing to do with socialism.
That speaks to the necessity of an opt-out and has nothing to do with socialism.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
Do you remember, as I dismissed the dismissed them and objected to both that I called them slavery and theft?Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:04 pmSo you are having memory problems now?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:01 pm And yet you are dismissing examples based on some understanding of what socialism is and isn't.
Nope. Wrong...again.
I'll happily use the normative definition that you have in mind from which you are asserting that any particular example is "not socialism"
You must be confusin' me with some one else cuz I haven't dismissed anything as not socialism.
Did you forget that you dismissed the BBC and HNS as being publicly owned?
And you objected to the claim of "public ownership" because the taxpayers had no say.
Did that happen or not?
I never brought up the dreaded socialism.
Again: you need to read the thread.
Re: the limits of fascism
But the BBC is voluntary, Harry.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:14 pm Do you remember, as I dismissed the dismissed them and objected to both that I called them slavery and theft?
I never brought up the dreaded socialism.
Again: you need to read the thread.
Every single person in the UK who pays for a TV license is doing that because they want to. You don't think that's a bit different to slavery/theft?
https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/services/bu ... nce-online
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
Good thing the brits have sanctioned the BBC and NHS then, so it's neither slavery nor theft.
That's like sayin' cuz America sanctioned slavery (actually owning human beings) it wasn't wrong.
That's like sayin' cuz America sanctioned slavery (actually owning human beings) it wasn't wrong.
Re: the limits of fascism
Well if you put it that way, then you must be a wage slave.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:17 pm Good thing the brits have sanctioned the BBC and NHS then, so it's neither slavery nor theft.
That's like sayin' cuz America sanctioned slavery (actually owning human beings) it wasn't wrong.
Just because you sanctioned it, then it doesn't mean you aren't a slave.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
Since you've never actually offered a definition for socialism, er, Socialism I can't say if that's accurate.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
Define wage slave.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:19 pmWell if you put it that way, then you must be a wage slave.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:17 pm Good thing the brits have sanctioned the BBC and NHS then, so it's neither slavery nor theft.
That's like sayin' cuz America sanctioned slavery (actually owning human beings) it wasn't wrong.
Just because you sanctioned it, then it doesn't mean you aren't a slave.
Re: the limits of fascism
[quote="henry quirk" post_id=502230 time=1615735205 user_id=472]
[quote=Advocate post_id=502224 time=1615734816 user_id=15238]
>Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
That speaks to the necessity of an opt-out and has nothing to do with socialism.
[/quote]
Since you've never actually offered a definition for socialism, er, [i]Socialism[/i] I can't say if that's accurate.
[/quote]
What i just said applies to all systems of government and has "Nothing To Do With <Any Version Of> Socialism!"
[quote=Advocate post_id=502224 time=1615734816 user_id=15238]
>Cuz it's slavery/theft. to take a man's resources without his sanction.
That speaks to the necessity of an opt-out and has nothing to do with socialism.
[/quote]
Since you've never actually offered a definition for socialism, er, [i]Socialism[/i] I can't say if that's accurate.
[/quote]
What i just said applies to all systems of government and has "Nothing To Do With <Any Version Of> Socialism!"
Re: the limits of fascism
yeah, but Harry wants to opt out of being governed.
He especially wants to opt out of being governed when he doesn't want to be held accountable for any of his actions.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
But the BBC is voluntary, Harry.
As Till sez: If you don't have a TV, you don't have to pay for the BBC, but you can't have a TV and not pay for the BBC.
Sounds kinda slavery-like, theft-like, to me.
As Till sez: If you don't have a TV, you don't have to pay for the BBC, but you can't have a TV and not pay for the BBC.
Sounds kinda slavery-like, theft-like, to me.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the limits of fascism
Re: the limits of fascism
Isn't that what your goal was all along when you compared voluntary participation in TV licensing to slavery?
If the "voluntary" part doesn't make it non-slavery, then you are a voluntary wage slave.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.