Philosophy Now Forum

Harbal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:35 pm I take it as a put-down, because that is what you meant it as.

Then you take it wrongly.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:39 pm If he doesn't have children, then there's no need for him to figure out how he would educate children he doesn't have. If you don't know how to pilot an airliner, how are you going to fly one? Go take flight lessons and get back to us then.

Really silly response. Philosophy begins with theorization in all categories of human life. It is a citizen’s responsibility to do so, and do so fairly, honestly and rationally.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:49 pm

Harbal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:35 pm I take it as a put-down, because that is what you meant it as.

Then you take it wrongly.

Good grief. You act as though mere opinion is incontrovertible truth. Have you learned nothing from philosophy? Try saying something objectively true once in a while.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:51 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:39 pm If he doesn't have children, then there's no need for him to figure out how he would educate children he doesn't have. If you don't know how to pilot an airliner, how are you going to fly one? Go take flight lessons and get back to us then.

Really silly response. Philosophy begins with theorization in all categories of human life. It is a citizen’s responsibility to do so, and do so fairly, honestly and rationally.

Then try philosophizing fairly honestly and rationally and then maybe you can converse with the rest of us.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:47 pm

Harbal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:35 pmYet it says all that needs to be said, which is your real objection to it.

Your *answer* or *explanation* was that of a child.

But, obviously, not as impressionable a child as you were hoping for.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:49 pm

Harbal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:35 pm I take it as a put-down, because that is what you meant it as.

Then you take it wrongly.

And I take that as an insult to my intelligence.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:41 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:36 pm

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:08 pm
Shallow answer. You are fundamentally ignorant of the philosophical category of sexual ethics. You represent (as I often say) the causal consequence of ignorance.

Do not take this personally. It is not meant as such.

HAHA.
Such a fascistic response.
You don't agree with me so you much be ignorant.


PS. Don'd take this personally but you are a C*nt

He doesn't react well to differences in others, does he?

Indeed.
He's another Immanual Can, thinks there is only one way - his way.

Harbal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:44 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:36 pm

PS. Don'd take this personally but you are a C*nt

"Had you children, and I suppose (?) you don’t, how would you educate them?"

The crux of an excellent question.

I would never have childrens in this kind of society/world. I realized this in my twenties. Now if i did decide to have childrens, it would have meant that the world wasn't a wreck... which in turn would have meant that there were few (if any) sexual abnormalities to protect my childrens from. We'd have your everyday run-of-the-mill homo and bisexuality (which has existed forever), but very very little of this sexual predator stuff and gender identity mess that is amping up everywhere.

That said - and this will sound harsh but imma harsh guy - if u are an adult who's chosen to have childrens in today's world, you've made a decision that is so bad that u almost don't even have the right to complain about the dangers your childrens face.

I say to such parents: did u not look around first? Do u not see the jungle around u? When u can't even take your teenage daughter to the pub without fishpie telling her lame jokes, veggies cussing her out for being woke, roydop advising her to stop doing math, skepdick giving her links to non-binary tripartite computer logic tables or AJ enrolling her in a seven week philosophy course? No, u don't get any sympathy from me, pal.

And further, i don't like the idea of couples making more childrens when there are hundreds of thousands of foster childrens without families that should be adopted, first.

It's that whole 'omg omg I'm gonna pass my special spiritual DNA heritage on!' myth that causes this. Yeah? What are u gonna say when a single chromosome copies wrong and your kid comes out we-todd-it? No special spiritual DNA now, huh. S'what i thought.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:08 pm
And further, i don't like the idea of couples making more childrens when there are hundreds of thousands of foster childrens without families that should be adopted, first.

But someone has to produce those foster children.

I know that, silly. I'm sayin everybody stop havin childrens until all the foster childrens are adopted.... then resume having childrens (if u wanna bring an life into this circus world).

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:37 pm I know that, silly. I'm sayin everybody stop havin childrens until all the foster childrens are adopted.... then resume having childrens (if u wanna bring an life into this circus world).

Agreed.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:08 pm I would never have childrens in this kind of society/world. I realized this in my twenties. Now if i did decide to have childrens, it would have meant that the world wasn't a wreck... which in turn would have meant that there were few (if any) sexual abnormalities to protect my childrens from. We'd have your everyday run-of-the-mill homo and bisexuality (which has existed forever), but very very little of this sexual predator stuff and gender identity mess that is amping up everywhere.

I say to such parents: did u not look around first? Do u not see the jungle around u? When u can't even take your teenage daughter to the pub without fishpie telling her lame jokes, veggies cussing her out for being woke, roydop advising her to stop doing math, skepdick giving her links to non-binary tripartite computer logic tables or AJ enrolling her in a seven week philosophy course? No, u don't get any sympathy from me, pal.

Oh the irony of this fuckstain upon the planet with his reasons for not wanting to bring his own children to life.

Pretty certain a father would prefer his daughter to hear a lame joke from fishpie than to have his daughter see your penis. Its twats like you that make bringing children into the world a big concern. You've probably done more than just show your cock to children hey? ..maybe you'll popup in a utube channel i've been watching today - and hey maybe that's Y I don't see anything funny in your post...pretty fucking disgusted by what people are getting their kicks out of actually - karma awaits ALL.

Note to Harbal

If you understand just this one thing, you will understand my approach and what I am doing here. Line it, hate it, or be indifferent, it is all the same to me.

I am here to clarify my own ideas in regard to the topics that come up here. I am the only subject that I am working with. And the only person I want to influence. I write about the choices I make and the reasons.

The statements I make — in this case about sexual ethics — apply to me alone. Yes, they are bolstered or reinforced by the (utterly stupid, immature, reckless and childish) things many people here say, including (and sometimes especially) you. But as you well know: that’s just my opinion.

My whole purpose is only to see, to realize, what I believe to be true, and to write it out here. Writing it out helps me. I have as much *right* to do this as anyone.

No offense is meant. None.

...offence dude, don't offend me again.