I am sure.
And he is all the other things besides.
You've misread the comment. The BBC article and link to The lightning and the sun are Traditionalist Savitri Devi.-1- wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:52 pmLady MacBeth was an environmentalist and into animal rights? For heaven's sake, there was no environment back then! And as for animals, they were mostly eaten. Some were kept as beasts of burden, and some as lovers and other strangers.Seleucus wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 4:12 pmJust read over the BBC article and the Wiki article, looks like, as with most rightists (Traditionalists), she was very into environmentalism and also animal rights. I downloaded a few of her books, looks like The lightning and the sun is the one you'll want to to get an in depth perspective on her philosophical outlook:
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/lightningsun.pdf
https://ia902608.us.archive.org/18/item ... 8432P..pdf
Sure, when you've converted to Islam, read the Quran, tafsir, hadith and sunnah, Islamic history and poetry, have a interracial marriage and family and have given your whole working life to the development of the 3rd World, like me, I'll be more open to hearing your name calling.-1- wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:58 pmNot exactly quite so precisely. I believe him (or her). I believe you are a neo-nazi, white supremacist, antisemitic antiislamic racist. I am not sure about homophobia, or sexism. I believe you are a wolf, called out many times for very good reasons.
In other words... I still care.
1. More name calling? But I'm still waiting on those scholarly articles supporting your claim that the Black race is more genetically varied than the White race? Alas, I've already looked through your post history, I know you're too stupid and lazy to read or dig through research and just troll this discussion group calling people names.davidm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:15 pmI am sure.
And he is all the other things besides.
You can be all that you say, and still be an ignoramus about genetics, and sociology, and still argue ,as you do, that might is right.Sure, when you've converted to Islam, read the Quran, tafsir, hadith and sunnah, Islamic history and poetry, have a interracial marriage and family and have given your whole working life to the development of the 3rd World, like me, I'll be more open to hearing your name calling.
Can you use the convenient quote function to show that please. Here is the link to all my posts ---> search.php?author_id=14903&sr=posts
1. Please refer me back to where I made the claim that the black people are more varied genetically than the white folks. I am too stupid and lazy to read through my stuff, but as far as I can remember, I've never made such a claim. That's A. B. is that it's futile to say one race is more varied than the other, as the variations are presented in sub-molecular differences, when you look at DNA evidence; which have not been quantified yet as to their degree of differentness. I.e., is CO2 more different from H2 than CO2 from NaCl? How do you measure that? I don't think that can be measured, so I never made the claim you claim I claimed.Seleucus wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:38 am
1. More name calling? But I'm still waiting on those scholarly articles supporting your claim that the Black race is more genetically varied than the White race? Alas, I've already looked through your post history, I know you're too stupid and lazy to read or dig through research and just troll this discussion group calling people names.
2. Sure, when you've converted to Islam, read the Quran, tafsir, hadith and sunnah, Islamic history and poetry, have a interracial marriage and family and have given your whole working life to the development of the 3rd World, like me, I'll be more open to hearing your name calling. The irony makes me laugh every time, it's always these white bread honkys who are calling you racist and Islamophobic. It's the White guilt I guess, these people are deep in the system of benefiting from White privilege and have a big guilty conscience about it so try to relieve it with transference by name calling. It's always the guys I know who have been expatriates the longest and in interracial marriages that are the most "racist", and its the guys living in 90% White Portland and Seattle who are calling everyone else racist. It's a phenomena that deserves more analysis for sure. This vid contains some commentary of this strange phenomena, https://youtu.be/eRATeUEBWJQ
Never said you did. Second time in two encounters you've misread in this discussion. Do you need glasses or something? davidm has claimed it with no support four (4) times now. Maybe catch up on the discussion before barging in. Notice how I quoted he and not you?
Never said you did if you could read and follow a discussion.I am too stupid and lazy to read through my stuff, but as far as I can remember, I've never made such a claim.
I couldn't agree more. Start with a definition of White and Black and "varied". Totally agree.That's A. B. is that it's futile to say one race is more varied than the other, as the variations are presented in sub-molecular differences, when you look at DNA evidence; which have not been quantified yet as to their degree of differentness. I.e., is CO2 more different from H2 than CO2 from NaCl? How do you measure that? I don't think that can be measured, so I never made the claim you claim I claimed.
I expect it is you who has gotten all heated and misread since the whole discussion is in plain view to anyone one who looks at it. You've quoted the wrong post.Either that or you mix me up with someone else who made the claim you claim has been claimed.
Your boyfriend?2. This section of your post was quite a vivid display of wide-ranging stupidity and a wild abandon of many unrelated and unsubstantiated opinions juxtaposed. Your style reminds me of a guy's whose initials are A.Z., a Toronto-based raging bull.
I've never heard a Black or a Muslim call anyone racist or Islamophobic as you were doing so that pretty much narrowed it down to a White beta leftist cuck. Islamophobic is a White peoples' word that politically correct leftists throw at other White people to put on a show of their vain moral superiority. Most Colored folk and Muslims I know can quite easily understand a sense of pride in one's heritage and identity, these people fought for centuries to get ownership of their homelands and expel the foreigners, they can understand my perspective as clear as the morning sun rise.This is not a joke or sarcasm. You know that you'd get a great deal of derision from an Arab, or a Muslim, or a Black person You got derision from me. And yet you were able to separate clues out of my post, that told you I was white.
How many Blacks and Muslims are hanging around philosophy (φιλοσοφία) discussion groups, a White tradition, more likely they're doing Black things like shooting hoops or Muslim things like chanting their Zikir (ذِکْر). But who knows? Maybe you're a Korean bred in the guilty resentful culture of the modern West?As Ezekiel or someone else put it in the Bible, "It does not matter what profession, calling, or lifestyle you pursue, as long as you strive to perfect it for it to as nearly approach the ideals as it possibly can."
Did you laugh at Othello? At Al Jolson? At women playing women in Shakespeare?Seleucus wrote:If only. I glance at the BBC and the CBC from time to time, and occasionally watch Australian television so I know political correctness is quite wide spread; on the Continent too. Critical theory is the dominant narrative in social sciences. I pretty much burst out laughing when I watched Guy Ritchie's King Arthur and Sir Lancelot was a Chinaman and Sir Galahad a Black man, wtf? ...
What 'civilization'? There has been no 'white' civilization, just white nations.This isn't the first depressive episode in the history of our civilization. ...
The fascists have always been in Europe. That you think this will lead to a white pan-nationalism makes you American and as deluded as Marcus Garvey.A great awakening is happening now. ...
Hmm... a white English/Wop/Bubble dressing up as a Hindu and married to an Indian, irony not a strong point with the Stormfarters then.Look at what the BBC is teaching us about even this very day: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-41757047
You can't have kids then as you must be mental promoting the Stormfarters agenda as they will be having no truck with any nuanced discussion on who's white or not if they get into power and you being a Muslim will put you high on the watch list.Seleucus wrote:2. Sure, when you've converted to Islam, read the Quran, tafsir, hadith and sunnah, Islamic history and poetry, have a interracial marriage and family and have given your whole working life to the development of the 3rd World, like me, I'll be more open to hearing your name calling. ...
Do you also find it ironic that those who are racist are also those who live in 90% white areas?The irony makes me laugh every time, it's always these white bread honkys who are calling you racist and Islamophobic. It's the White guilt I guess, these people are deep in the system of benefiting from White privilege and have a big guilty conscience about it so try to relieve it with transference by name calling. It's always the guys I know who have been expatriates the longest and in interracial marriages that are the most "racist", and its the guys living in 90% White Portland and Seattle who are calling everyone else racist. ...
It surely does, if you mean the fantasies of the American about Europe.It's a phenomena that deserves more analysis for sure. ...
This vid contains some commentary of this strange phenomena, https://youtu.be/eRATeUEBWJQ
Guy Ritchie got completely burnt on King Arthur. I'm not sure whether to feel sorry for him or laugh at him? He obviously, and correctly anticipated that if he made a movie about the sublime and deep folk history of the European people he was going to be call a racist and all that. So he tried to get a step ahead of his critics by loading his movie, set in post-Roman Britain, impossibly with Blacks and mulattoes and Orientals. Unfortunately, the critics didn't care and still ripped his movie to shreds. When it's Whites they call it White washing, so I guess we can call what he did was Yellow washed and Black washed his movie. If you know Guy Ritchie movies like Revolver you got exactly what you would have expected so there wasn't really anything to criticize, King Arther was a Guy Ritchie movie, love it or leave it. Just the ridiculous part was the Black and Yellow washing and then the critics still roasted him for having the racist impudence to make a movie about White lore. What can you say? What will the sequel be like, Sir Galahad doing kung fu and Sir Lancelot dropping dope rhymes?Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:03 pmDid you laugh at Othello? At Al Jolson? At women playing women in Shakespeare?Seleucus wrote:If only. I glance at the BBC and the CBC from time to time, and occasionally watch Australian television so I know political correctness is quite wide spread; on the Continent too. Critical theory is the dominant narrative in social sciences. I pretty much burst out laughing when I watched Guy Ritchie's King Arthur and Sir Lancelot was a Chinaman and Sir Galahad a Black man, wtf? ...
How much Whiter can you get than Alexander the Great and he married an Asian? After Alexander died, Seleucus was the only Diadochi to keep the Asian wife Alexander had insisted his generals marry, her name was Apama. By bravery and genius, Seleucus eventually reconstructed nearly the whole of Alexander's conquests into the Seleucid Empire, uniting the whole East and West for centuries until Roman times. You actually know a lot about Seleucid times without even knowing it, Hannibal retired to the Seleucid court and the Book of Maccabees and Hanukkah both come out of that period.
How uninteresting and none of it answers my questions.Seleucus wrote:Guy Ritchie got completely burnt on King Arthur. ...
And he would have had no truck with 'race supremacy' eh!Seleucus wrote:How much Whiter can you get than Alexander the Great and he married an Asian? ...
"whole East and West"After Alexander died, Seleucus was the only Diadochi to keep the Asian wife Alexander had insisted his generals marry, her name was Apama. By bravery and genius, Seleucus eventually reconstructed nearly the whole of Alexander's conquests into the Seleucid Empire, uniting the whole East and West for centuries until Roman times. ...
Like I've said, who gives a toss.You actually know a lot about Seleucid times without even knowing it, Hannibal retired to the Seleucid court and the Book of Maccabees and Hanukkah both come out of that period.