Re: The Democrat Party Hates America
Posted: Thu May 28, 2026 1:45 am
Hey chunky. Still overinflating those spheres?
at Canzookia.com
https://canzookia.com/
Hey chunky. Still overinflating those spheres?
That's interesting, you two appearing at the same time.
I don't know about SOB's posting habits. I just got an email alerting me to a response to one of my posts.
That sounds plausible, I guess.
Well, it's a bit paradoxical. It depends what we mean by "America."
And so, in some sort of contrast, you imagine that the Republican Party loves America? Otherwise you would say that political parties entrenched in their own corrupt power hate elements or systems of America that interfere with their agendas. See, not that hard to speak the truth. You're being served somehow by not doing so.
And somehow that doesn't describe Republicans?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pmIf we mean the name to refer to the wealth and opportunities America offers, the Democrats love America. I think it's fair to say they see it as the power-base from which they can produce the changes they desire in larger human affairs. They devote massive amounts of attention to getting America to become what they want it to be. They know America has de facto political power, economic power, technological and innovative leadership and the most military power in the larger world. They want America to be theirs. I guess that's a kind of 'love.'
It isn't? Haven't abuses of power affected a great many people in that way?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pmThey continually run down America as a place that's "racist," and "capitalist" and "oppressive," and "genocidal," and "colonialist," and "sexist," and...whatever else they can conjure up.
Sounds like you're talking more about Republicans.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pm They don't care about the people in the cities and states over which they preside, either. They've made that very clear.
Trump reframes and projects daily. Projection is not limited to any political party. Nor are abuses and corruption limited to any political party. So how is it serving you to frame it like that?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pm So this public unawareness enables the Democrats to reframe their own past, without getting called on it.
And Republicans aren't?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pmThey're demagogues, to the core. They'll just never openly confess that.
How about the global elites of Conservatism? How about the leaders who are currently acting on their own whims, ignoring all standards and rules, causing destruction to their own people and others around the globe? Do they hate the planet and the different people who occupy it? Do they care only for their own gain and power? Are they dangerous to humankind? Do their supporters have any self-awareness of their own? Who really wants all this corrupt shit from ANY leader?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 5:04 pmThe global 'elites' of Socialism have no more use for their American tools than they have for anybody else. And the fewer of them there are, the more effectively power and influence can be concentrated in a few hands.
The Republicans have their own corruption problem, in at least some instances. But their present orientation is for secure borders, in favour of secure elections, and not for globalism or Fabian Socialism, or for eliminating America as a distinct entity in favour of some other conglomerate. So they're ahead on that much.
You think Democrats don't want that? Maybe the issue is about how it's handled, or how broken the system is.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm The Republicans have their own corruption problem, in at least some instances. But their present orientation is for secure borders,
You think Democrats don't want that?
What kind of globalism?
You think Democrats want that?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pmor for eliminating America as a distinct entity in favour of some other conglomerate.
Oh, you want to talk about ignorance and injustice in humankind's history, and what really drives much of it: Christianity and religion? Let's go to the root of belief systems that allow and glorify humans to do the horrific things they do to others as if they are divinely directed. Is there a label for that? There should be.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm They're also ahead historically. They're the party that didn't...
You know they don't. Just look at what the Biden admin. did.Lacewing wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 8:09 pmYou think Democrats don't want that? Maybe the issue is about how it's handled, or how broken the system is.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm The Republicans have their own corruption problem, in at least some instances. But their present orientation is for secure borders,
Again, you know they don't. There really is no other plausible explanation for resisting voter ID, or opposing the elimination of gerrymandered "ethnic" districts.You think Democrats don't want that?
Beyond question.You think Democrats want that?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pmor for eliminating America as a distinct entity in favour of some other conglomerate.
No, because other cases throughout world history don't change this one. Just in the history of the Democrats. The Republicans had a different historical relationship to all these things.Oh, you want to talk about ignorance and injustice in humankind's history,...Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm They're also ahead historically. They're the party that didn't...
So, you still think 'the Democrats' are some kind of group that all think the same? That doesn't even make sense, and yet you keep building on that false belief. Do you think everyone who voted for Trump agrees with what he's doing now? Will you ever recognize that there are more perspectives at work?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 10:00 pmYou know they don't. Just look at what the Biden admin. did.Lacewing wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 8:09 pmYou think Democrats don't want that? Maybe the issue is about how it's handled, or how broken the system is.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm The Republicans have their own corruption problem, in at least some instances. But their present orientation is for secure borders,You think Democrats don't want that?
So, it doesn't matter to you how the issues you cited were a result of religion... because you just want to blame 'the Democrats'? That's the simplistic model that works for your purposes. Ignore the monster behind the curtain. Blame ANYTHING OTHER than what you have aligned yourself with.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm They're also ahead historically. They're the party that didn't...No, because other cases throughout world history don't change this one.
The ones in power did.
So...the Dems had slaves, because religion. And they started the KKK because...religion. And they defended Segregation because...religion. And the BLM riots...very religious? This is your argument?So, it doesn't matter to you how the issues you cited were a result of religion...Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pm They're also ahead historically. They're the party that didn't...No, because other cases throughout world history don't change this one.
Religion was a **major** factor in the KKK, especially in the second Klan of the 1910s–1920s, where leaders wrapped white supremacy and nativism in Protestant language, rituals, hymns, and symbols like the burning cross. But it was not simply a church movement: historians note that the Klan used religion both as genuine identity and as a recruiting/legitimizing frame, while mainstream Christian denominations officially denounced it. [factually](https://factually.co/fact-checks/histor ... ory-f9a410)
## How religion functioned
The Klan presented itself as defending “Anglo-Protestant” or “100% American” values, which meant Protestant Christianity was tied to its ideas about nation, race, and morality. That religious framing helped turn racism into something members could see as sacred duty rather than just politics. [berkleycenter.georgetown](https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/re ... e-politics)
## How deep it went
Some scholars argue the second Klan became almost a kind of **civil religion**, with its own texts, ceremonies, and faith-like identity. Others are more cautious and say religion was central to its rhetoric and self-image, but the Klan was still primarily a political and social movement that weaponized Protestant symbolism. [factually](https://factually.co/fact-checks/histor ... kkk-2e02c4)
## Bottom line
So religion was not a side issue; it was one of the KKK’s core organizing ideas, especially in the second Klan. But that “religion” was highly selective and exclusionary, built around white Protestant supremacy rather than mainstream Christianity. [factually](https://factually.co/fact-checks/histor ... ory-f9a410)
How do you know?
Are you really unaware of how much springs from religion? Look it up. Then maybe you can focus on what actually drives a lot of corruption and abuse.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2026 7:12 pmSo...the Dems had slaves, because religion. And they started the KKK because...religion. And they defended Segregation because...religion. And the BLM riots...very religious? This is your argument?