Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
Re: Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
Well he has talked about a 'supreme being', smacks a bit of an ontological argument, but it begs the question, what do you mean by 'being'? But you're right Hobbes, he's done it before and may well try again.
-
henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
"you are funny but civil. You engage in debate with enthusiasm and wit, but never seem to feel the need to fall to low tactics. You add value."
Kind words...not always true, though...I can be a real dick from time to time...usually, however, this happens when I've done my best to get a point across and the other party willfully ignores that point...I have limited time and it just plain pisses me off to invest it, and myself, only to find I've squandered myself, my time, my energy.
I try, in such circumstances, to *shrug* and move on, but sometimes impulse gets the better of me.
Perhaps my only saving grace is I only go jackass at (what I take to be) the end of a conversation...many folks on-line go jackass right out of the gate.
Some folks do this cuz they wanna be in the conversation but have nuthin' to offer. Some do it cuz they know they can't dispute. A small few do it simply cuz they can...they have decent thinking, can refute and dispute, but they choose to hobble themselves with jackassery...these folks are the most puzzling, and annoying, to me.
Meh...
Kind words...not always true, though...I can be a real dick from time to time...usually, however, this happens when I've done my best to get a point across and the other party willfully ignores that point...I have limited time and it just plain pisses me off to invest it, and myself, only to find I've squandered myself, my time, my energy.
I try, in such circumstances, to *shrug* and move on, but sometimes impulse gets the better of me.
Perhaps my only saving grace is I only go jackass at (what I take to be) the end of a conversation...many folks on-line go jackass right out of the gate.
Some folks do this cuz they wanna be in the conversation but have nuthin' to offer. Some do it cuz they know they can't dispute. A small few do it simply cuz they can...they have decent thinking, can refute and dispute, but they choose to hobble themselves with jackassery...these folks are the most puzzling, and annoying, to me.
Meh...
Re: Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
So there really is evidence of a Crom, and he gives rare endorsements.
THE CROM ENDORSEMENT
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... sement.php
THE CROM ENDORSEMENT
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... sement.php
-
Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
Anywooo it looks like he run away again.uwot wrote:Well he has talked about a 'supreme being', smacks a bit of an ontological argument, but it begs the question, what do you mean by 'being'? But you're right Hobbes, he's done it before and may well try again.
Re: Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
Well, he'll do a bit of praying, which will wash away everything that was said, and he will become a born again believer that atheists have something to prove. Middle to end of March I reckon.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Anywooo it looks like he run away again.
-
Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Why Christianity Fails in Terms of the Evidence
When his mouth gets a bad taste from licking his wounds.uwot wrote:Well, he'll do a bit of praying, which will wash away everything that was said, and he will become a born again believer that atheists have something to prove. Middle to end of March I reckon.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Anywooo it looks like he run away again.