WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
What I said , is word for word A B S O L U T E truth ! You are not able and not willing to grasp it - that is fact , nothing else ! ! !
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Just because you know life is absurd does not mean you have to commit suicide. what do you mean that Camus did not live up to his philosophy. Are you?Dalek Prime wrote:I hear you Hobbes. The term antinatalism is actually much newer than even the 19th century. But the origins of the antinatalist philosophy have been around much longer, though it lacked a name. It's also probably not just a passing thought, but an unspoken longtime feeling within those thinking it, but not getting the discussion or literature it deserves because it's unpopular, almost taboo. Which is odd, because the almost exact sentiment is written even in Leviticus.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
With respect Antinatalism is a phenomenon born of the 19thC. For Aristotle, saying it might have been better never to have ben born is a passing thought, not a philosophy.
I always find myself disappointed to see people like Camus, the Buddha or Schopenhauer not living up to their philosophical beliefs. Samuel Beckett did, though he thought it prudent not to write heavily on the subject. Shame really. Oh well, I shouldn't be so hard on them. They didn't have the benefit of the various birth control methods I had available.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG! Now run along and find a Forum with people that give a shit about your idiotic ramblings.manden wrote:What I said , is word for word A B S O L U T E truth ! You are not able and not willing to grasp it - that is fact , nothing else ! ! !
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
You have very very much to learn ! More than you can imagine !
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
You are ignorant and stupid. Your learning has not even begun.manden wrote:You have very very much to learn ! More than you can imagine !
How old are you ? 12?
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Very old ! Thank you . I estimate you at 1 month ! ! ! ( your real age before the real creator )
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Wow, and manden knows the mind of God too!!!manden wrote:Very old ! Thank you . I estimate you at 1 month ! ! ! ( your real age before the real creator )
What a remarkable and talented boy.
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
And I'm the one who usually gets accused of not making any philosophical contribution. You lot make me look like Emmanuel Descart.
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Actually, you're right. Camus did live up to his philosophy, and died absurdly with an unused train ticket in his pocket, which, if used, would have saved him from a fatal auto accident.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Just because you know life is absurd does not mean you have to commit suicide. what do you mean that Camus did not live up to his philosophy. Are you?Dalek Prime wrote:I hear you Hobbes. The term antinatalism is actually much newer than even the 19th century. But the origins of the antinatalist philosophy have been around much longer, though it lacked a name. It's also probably not just a passing thought, but an unspoken longtime feeling within those thinking it, but not getting the discussion or literature it deserves because it's unpopular, almost taboo. Which is odd, because the almost exact sentiment is written even in Leviticus.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
With respect Antinatalism is a phenomenon born of the 19thC. For Aristotle, saying it might have been better never to have ben born is a passing thought, not a philosophy.
I always find myself disappointed to see people like Camus, the Buddha or Schopenhauer not living up to their philosophical beliefs. Samuel Beckett did, though he thought it prudent not to write heavily on the subject. Shame really. Oh well, I shouldn't be so hard on them. They didn't have the benefit of the various birth control methods I had available.
To live according to my philosophy, all I had to do was not breed. Mission accomplished.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Dalek Prime wrote:Actually, you're right. Camus did live up to his philosophy, and died absurdly with an unused train ticket in his pocket, which, if used, would have saved him from a fatal auto accident.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Dalek Prime wrote: I hear you Hobbes. The term antinatalism is actually much newer than even the 19th century. But the origins of the antinatalist philosophy have been around much longer, though it lacked a name. It's also probably not just a passing thought, but an unspoken longtime feeling within those thinking it, but not getting the discussion or literature it deserves because it's unpopular, almost taboo. Which is odd, because the almost exact sentiment is written even in Leviticus.
I always find myself disappointed to see people like Camus, the Buddha or Schopenhauer not living up to their philosophical beliefs. Samuel Beckett did, though he thought it prudent not to write heavily on the subject. Shame really. Oh well, I shouldn't be so hard on them. They didn't have the benefit of the various birth control methods I had available.
Just because you know life is absurd does not mean you have to commit suicide. what do you mean that Camus did not live up to his philosophy. Are you?
To live according to my philosophy, all I had to do was not breed. Mission accomplished.
Do you not, as an anti-natalist have the duty to commit suicide?
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Why do you always put spaces between punctuation marks? The above should be written, "that is fact, nothing else!!!"manden wrote:...that is fact , nothing else ! ! !
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Because he's and idiot, just like you are.bobevenson wrote:Why do you always put spaces between punctuation marks? The above should be written, "that is fact, nothing else!!!"manden wrote:...that is fact , nothing else ! ! !
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
No, he's not an idiot, English isn't his native language. You're the godforsaken idiot around here!thedoc wrote:Because he's and idiot, just like you are.bobevenson wrote:Why do you always put spaces between punctuation marks? The above should be written, "that is fact, nothing else!!!"manden wrote:...that is fact , nothing else ! ! !
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
Buy what implication all who do not speak English are not idiots.bobevenson wrote:No, he's not an idiot, English isn't his native language. !thedoc wrote:Because he's and idiot, just like you are.bobevenson wrote: Why do you always put spaces between punctuation marks? The above should be written, "that is fact, nothing else!!!"
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: WHY can't the religions bring the mankind forward ?
The point was numbnuts that "... that type of logic ..." was no type of Logic at all.SpheresOfBalance wrote: You don't pay attention to shit, and are CONSTANTLY, putting words in others mouths. You're either far too old and your mind is slipping, or your nuts! I said as much numbnuts. I'm beginning to feel sorry for you!