Re: Aesthetics/Feelings/Judgments
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:04 am
Hi MB....tried posting a long reply this morning and lost it. Too tired right now to try to remember all I wrote. Sorry. Will try again soon.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Communication is all, ain't it ? And I agree that it can be constrained by so many different factors, especially on a philo forum. It doesn't help if a post is a mish-mash and difficult to follow. Usually my 'aesthetics' ( concern with pleasing appearance ) tells me to clearly separate the main points to help anyone who is trying to follow any discussion; and also to add (expand or extend my thoughts) or subtract ( clearing out the extraneous garbage ) as I 'see' fit. However, sometimes my 'judgment' ain't all that good and I allow my 'feelings' to let rip, or thoughts to traipse out willy-nilly; so, what is 'best' on a philo forum ?artisticsolution wrote:
AS: I have a strong curiosity to know if others think as I do so when I speak I try to say exactly what is on my mind. I try not to hold anything back...because if I do...then I would never be able to have another tell me what they think...or what they know about a certain subject. How could we if we were both on guard about appearing a certain 'way' to others.
Why even communicate at all if not to understand what another feels about a certain subject and to compare their thoughts with one's own thoughts? There is comfort in communication...it's like a validation that you are not alone. I can't explain it....
MB:My last post was a total mish-mash...because I simply got tired...hopefully, not too difficult to decipher...
AS: LOL MB I have to say...all your post are hard to decipher. Not because they are 'mish-mash' but because your personality shines through in all of them and you have a very unique personality. The way you word things is foreign to me so it takes me a while to understand what you mean.
MB:To lessen any potential confusion, perhaps we should keep our posts shorter?
AS:I think the problem I was having is that I was trying to explain using different scenarios because it appeared to me that I was not being clear. I mean what I was saying was clear to me...but you implied it was not clear to you. So I was trying to say the same thing only change it from the 'art' example to the 'tool' example. But I agree I did not succeed...lol.
What I mean is...I have noticed that the entire world speaks a different language than I do....lol. Even though they might be speaking English...sometimes I simply cannot understand. I have come to just accept my limitations, and have realized that if everybody else gets it...and I don't...well then it can't be everybody else who is wrong and me right (as far as communication goes) right? I mean rationally speaking...if language is a form of communication and cooperation...then an agreement has to be made between communicating parties...and I can't expect my needs and desires regarding communication to supersede the majority. It is much easier that I conform to their way rather than they conform to mine.marjoramblues wrote: However, I'm not sure how the way I word things is particularly 'foreign' to you ?
AS.artisticsolution wrote:What I mean is...I have noticed that the entire world speaks a different language than I do....lol. Even though they might be speaking English...sometimes I simply cannot understand. I have come to just accept my limitations, and have realized that if everybody else gets it...and I don't...well then it can't be everybody else who is wrong and me right (as far as communication goes) right? I mean rationally speaking...if language is a form of communication and cooperation...then an agreement has to be made between communicating parties...and I can't expect my needs and desires regarding communication to supersede the majority. It is much easier that I conform to their way rather than they conform to mine.marjoramblues wrote: However, I'm not sure how the way I word things is particularly 'foreign' to you ?
The problem is I can't really teach myself something I don't know I don't know. Everybody else has reached some sort of agreement in the way they will communicate and I did not get the memo. And what is worse...I don't even understand what it is I am missing!
Here is a weak example of what I mean... let's just use the phrase, "You're welcome." To me it sounds condescending a little sort of like, "Yes...you should be grateful I went out of my way to help the likes of you." I have never been able to say the phrase "You're welcome." As opposed to, "Da Nada" which to me sounds more respectful. Translated it means "for nothing" To me it sounds as if one is saying, "No worries, like you I have been there before and I probably will be again. No biggie." It is a more intimate form of communication which places one right dead center in the heart of someone else. I like that much better. Aesthetically speaking.
So when I speak....I do it in a way that I am exposed and vulnerable but confident and happy in that realization of myself. So when I say your speech patterns are foreign to me, I mean exactly that. That you got the memo and I did not. You communicate sort of like Richard Baron did. There is intelligence and higher education, there is a familiarity with philosophical terms and jargon, there is a sense of humor and personality based on a culture I am not familiar with...and then roll them altogether and I have to read, and reread, and then ask 20 questions to come to an understanding of some statements.
AS, I think you are over-thinking things, as I often do*.artisticsolution wrote:Oh Sorry...it sprang from my frustration at not being able to understand things other people do and seeing the same thing happen sometimes when I try to communicate back with them. It seems like everyone but me understands.
We each have areas where we feel more comfortable than others. I would love to do what you do and recently when back to art class but that way didn't work out for me. You are more likely to find me assisting people with their use of technology. It is not a black art but a tool for use and if you are comfortable using that tool, that's good. If not, why should you - there are others with more expertise to assist or do it for you.artisticsolution wrote:but I am impatient. I don't want to spend all day trying to figure out how to use paypal.
Thundril wrote:I agree, to the extent that aesthetics is a positively acting collection of forces/neurochemical states, the negative of which would be anaesthetics.
artisticsolution wrote:Hi MB,
MB:I know that you recognize that there are different 'ways' and 'patterns' re communication, depending on writer/artist, message/medium and any 'audience' in context. I don't accept this idea of a 'world memo' which everyone has received - where did that spring from ?
AS: Oh Sorry...it sprang from my frustration at not being able to understand things other people do and seeing the same thing happen sometimes when I try to communicate back with them.
It seems like everyone but me understands.
For instance, take last week....All I wanted to do was be able to use paypal so that people could purchase my paintings. Easy right? Obviously...as almost everyone I know uses it and has not had a problem setting it up...oh but not me. I go to the paypal site and it might have been written in Chinese. So there I was...reading it over and over...and the way it was worded just did not make sense to me! So I just did what I could do and thought I had followed the instructions correct... ...how hard do I have to work to do what was a cinch for other people?! It friggin pisses me off!
MB:You are more than able to understand and express yourself - what's with this eternal complaint ( yet not !) you have about yourself ? Why do you think you are 'special' in any way?
AS: Yes, I am a good artist. So what's so wrong with admitting I am 'good at this' yet 'suck at that'? I don't understand why you use the word special. To me 'special' means something positive...not something negative.
MB:So what if you have to re-read and ask 101 questions - I'm much the same. I believe that in a philo discussion that is pretty much how it should be - so much better than gibly assuming that you know exactly what someone else is talking about, and where they are coming from personality-wise.
AS: I hear what you are saying...but philosophy and real life are different and I am impatient when I don't understand the language style. I don't want to spend all day trying to figure out how to use paypal. I want to have a life.
Why?Sorry to interrupt folks
Who is this 'She' ?reasonvemotion wrote:She speaks a different language AS. She will never get it. I have a new computer, what trauma and tribulations I had to go through to set it up. LOL I think you will relate to what I have just said! We live in a Left side of the brain world.
Hi B2B - Thundril's idea intrigued me too - look forward to hearing more about itbus2bondi wrote:Thundril wrote:I agree, to the extent that aesthetics is a positively acting collection of forces/neurochemical states, the negative of which would be anaesthetics.
i was thinking about this briefly at work today, and seemed to come upon something similar.
i'd like to add more in regards to many of the comments in the thread, but am not able to at the moment. something i've been trying to work on is trying to find a specific set aside time to make more thoughtful contributions.
another thing is in relation to the above, stopping my mind from drifting at work! it drifts and drifts and drifts and drifts here and there and everywhere.
i am constantly telling my own self to not drift and focus when at work. i shouldn't say constantly, because it is actually not always a problem, but i do find it to be quite frequently. trying to work on that too.
all that aside, i would like to add more later when possible. and As, i hope work is picking up for you.