Thoughts of Chairman Puto

[chaz wyman]

Chaz, you niit wit, the answer Puto is looking for is (b).

Blast!!
I knew it all along!

Okay thanks.

[chaz wyman]

Since I have found out what kind of Philosopher your not, and how you do your Philosophy. Please define some terms for me: determinism, and Existentialism.

Okay the answer is (B).

Hoot!

[puto]

Chaz, so far you have made a joke of Philosophy. The answer to Kierkegaard would be B? What is answer B? What is determinism? answer B? You are a joke, you can't define anything, and you don't even know the method of the history of Philosophy. Good-by, and good riddance to you! It is, so funny when you run across someone who does not know any philosophy, and then you try to converse with them, and this is what you get. I was told that message boards about philosophy would get real old real quick. They have years ago. Chaz learn some philosophy, o.k.?

[chaz wyman]

Chaz, so far you have made a joke of Philosophy. The answer to Kierkegaard would be B? What is answer B? What is determinism? answer B? You are a joke, you can't define anything, and you don't even know the method of the history of Philosophy. Good-by, and good riddance to you! It is, so funny when you run across someone who does not know any philosophy, and then you try to converse with them, and this is what you get. I was told that message boards about philosophy would get real old real quick. They have years ago. Chaz learn some philosophy, o.k.?

Don't you mean Good Bye?

Okay if you go away then I promise to learn some history and philosophy. Why not come back in a year or two, when I have boned up on few things.

[lancek4]

Chaiirman Puto, I object to the determination of the board!

The answer is (b); we have all agreed; but
I have determined that kierkegaard has answered (c)- both (a) and (b). But keiirkeggard has made it amply clear that contrary to his contemporaries, (and Nietzsche made nothing Too clear), but concordant with Wittgestien, and against the misunderstood Sartre, in line with Lacan, that the answer is (d)-none of the above.
So, Mr Chairman, how might you have determined that we can come to a determination of Determinism? And what is this determination?

Indeed, how might there exist Existentialism?

[chaz wyman]

Chaiirman Puto, I object to the determination of the board!

The answer is (b); we have all agreed; but
I have determined that kierkegaard has answered (c)- both (a) and (b). But keiirkeggard has made it amply clear that contrary to his contemporaries, (and Nietzsche made nothing Too clear), but concordant with Wittgestien, and against the misunderstood Sartre, in line with Lacan, that the answer is (d)-none of the above.
So, Mr Chairman, how might you have determined that we can come to a determination of Determinism? And what is this determination?

Indeed, how might there exist Existentialism?

Don't speak too loud but I think my cunning plan to see him off has worked!!! Thanks for the help.

[lancek4]

eeeeek ! maybe the answer is (b) after all !?!?