Page 3 of 3
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:43 am
by accelafine
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:50 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:39 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:31 am
Really, what do you think I think they need to do?
Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.
I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious. The Trump administration has become a parody of itself. Kudos to them.
Well you are the world's idocracy so what do you expect? Everyone is so self-righteous. Trump
IS America. Hope this helps. You're welcome.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:46 am
by Gary Childress
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:43 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:50 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:39 am
Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.
I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious. The Trump administration has become a parody of itself. Kudos to them.
Well you are the world's idocracy so what do you expect? Everyone is so self-righteous. Trump
IS America. Hope this helps. You're welcome.
Well, I didn't vote for Trump. And I don't approve of his policies or his behavior, and I'm an American. So Trump is some of America but not all of it.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:51 am
by accelafine
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:46 am
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:43 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:50 am
I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious. The Trump administration has become a parody of itself. Kudos to them.
Well you are the world's idocracy so what do you expect? Everyone is so self-righteous. Trump
IS America. Hope this helps. You're welcome.
Well, I didn't vote for Trump. And I don't approve of his policies or his behavior, and I'm an American. So Trump is some of America but not all of it.
Whatever. You are dreaming if you believe that. You are him and he is you, Gary Childress. He's your queen and you are his drone
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:28 pm
by Immanuel Can
Chairman Jordan Requests Documents about Southern Poverty Law Center Paying Extremists
April 23, 2026
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Interim CEO and President Bryan Fair demanding documents and communications regarding the SPLC paying sources and any coordination with the Biden-Harris Administration. On April 21, 2026, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging the SPLC with wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Alarmingly, between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC allegedly funneled more than $3 million in donor funds to individuals associated with violent extremist groups like the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, and the National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party), among others. The SPLC's informants remained "engaged in the active promotion of racist groups" while receiving money from the SPLC. For instance, one informant who helped to plan the violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017 "made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees."
At no point did the SPLC inform its donors that their charitable donations might be used to pay leaders of violent hate groups.
The Committee has been conducting oversight of the Biden-Harris Administration's close coordination with the SPLC on federal civil rights matters. We have found that an internal FBI system contained at least 13 documents, including the Richmond memorandum that labeled traditional Catholics as "violent extremists," that cited material from the SPLC. In addition, other publicly available documents revealed how the Justice Department partnered closely with the SPLC during the Biden-Harris Administration, including scheduling regular meetings, giving the SPLC early access to federal law-enforcement data, and allowing SPLC employees to train federal prosecutors. The new information about the SPLC alleged in the indictment only raises further questions
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 4:48 pm
by FlashDangerpants
This is all about securing a court order to name the informants in the ranks of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, outfits that are about to have prominent members' Jan 6th related convictions vacated.
The administration is on the side of the racist militias. Always were.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:49 pm
by MikeNovack
I've carefully read the stories (about the indictment, etc.) No mention about the existence of the SPLC Action Fund. I guess it would not make such a news splash if were reported that the charge/investigation is just over whether the SPLC itself improperly paid out for things a r501(c)3 should not instead of, as would be proper, the SPLC Action Fund doing so (not a 501(c)3). That is something a 501(c)3 has to be very careful about. But being charged does not mean guilty. Can ALWAYS demand investigation of the books of a 501(c)3 `<< in other words, did not require bringing charges, THAT just for publicity >>
I have some direct experience with this (making sure the right org, the 501(c)3 or the partner PAC, pays for what). I am not currently the treasurer of any 501(c)3 but over the years have been for three of them!.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:17 pm
by Gary Childress
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:51 am
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:46 am
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:43 am
Well you are the world's idocracy so what do you expect? Everyone is so self-righteous. Trump
IS America. Hope this helps. You're welcome.
Well, I didn't vote for Trump. And I don't approve of his policies or his behavior, and I'm an American. So Trump is some of America but not all of it.
Whatever. You are dreaming if you believe that. You are him and he is you, Gary Childress. He's your queen and you are his drone
If you say so, it must be so.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Thu May 07, 2026 5:22 pm
by Phil8659
Personally, I am a hard core racist, especially if really expensive cars are used.
But I do become puzzled by people who actually believe that the various skin tones is what is responsible for human psycho and sociopathic behavior. Things like that make me perform experiments which lasts even months or years. I actually got one of those paint charts, and filmed it for over six months trying to detect any behavior at all.
Maybe the test failure was due to my inability to use actual skin samples.
Re: Anti-Racism Case
Posted: Fri May 15, 2026 11:29 pm
by FlashDangerpants
The LegalEagle YouTube channel has discussed the chances of this prosecution succeeding
Kash Patel Criminally Charges Anti-Klan Lawyers
Not much chance of wire fraud charges succeeding when they money is being used for the exact thing the donors wanted it used for.
Relevant case law and precedents don't go the way Patel needs, and the case would do well to get past the initial motions to dismiss and even end up in front of a jury.