Trump as Jesus

[Walker]

Mist in the wind.

Was this self-referential?

He's more of a piss into wind.

The polls prove that we’ve got him on the ropes, your contribution is more vital to democracy than ever before, so donate generously and forget about the thousands of millions that Kamala vainly burned through in record time. Your investment in truth and peace is greatly appreciated.

[Iwannaplato]

Was this self-referential?

He's more of a piss into wind.

The polls prove that we’ve got him on the ropes, your contribution is more vital to democracy than ever before, so donate generously and forget about the thousands of millions that Kamala vainly burned through in record time. Your investment in truth and peace is greatly appreciated.

What if someone thinks neither of them is worthy, remotely, of that role? How long are we going to buy the latest two insiders that get trotted out like a choice?

Kamala badder.
Trump badder.
Those arguments work on people, at least potentially, who were pleased with a candidate, though, really not even there.

'Well, Sara took cash out of your purse; Mom,' says the kid who set fire to the cat. Both siblings should be grounded.

[puto]

Iwannaplato, lol

[Iwannaplato]

Iwannaplato, lol

Ah, good an Abbott and Costello fan.

[puto]

Iwannaplato, you are a lucky guess with a baseless conviction.

[Iwannaplato]

Iwannaplato, you are a lucky guess with a baseless conviction.

Nice pun

Now consider the philosopher baseball team, and the fat man and the thin man are talking about the team. The thin man going through the roster after questions from the fat man. Start with Kant and work your way to Plato though Hume and Moore and others.

Find the possibilities with those names------>fat guy confusion.

The fat guy then starts setting up scenarios, to better understand.

So, a ball is hit to left field.
Is that fair?
Yeah, it's fair?
How's that fair?
Cause that's the situation I'm describing.
But that's circular reasoning.

[Walker]

The people picked candidate Trump, who has proven to be quite capable.

The Democrat Party decided to run Kamalala (who never won a primary), Biden (who couldn't find an exit) , and Hillary (instead of Commie Bernie, who was popular with Democrats at the time).

Trump is worthy. The other three were not.

The people picked Trump.
The Democrat Party picked the unworthy.

Their judgment sucks, and they disapprove of Trump, who is quite capable.

The Democrats know he is capable ... so they tried to make the case that he should not be caped, like a King.

Come, join with the people ... Join with the People's Choice.

[Impenitent]

Iwannaplato, you are a lucky guess with a baseless conviction.

Nice pun

Now consider the philosopher baseball team, and the fat man and the thin man are talking about the team. The thin man going through the roster after questions from the fat man. Start with Kant and work your way to Plato though Hume and Moore and others.

Find the possibilities with those names------>fat guy confusion.

The fat guy then starts setting up scenarios, to better understand.

So, a ball is hit to left field.
Is that fair?
Yeah, it's fair?
How's that fair?
Cause that's the situation I'm describing.
But that's circular reasoning.

Fat man said fine and destroyed Nagasaki

-Imp

[Iwannaplato]

Fat man said fine and destroyed Nagasaki
-Imp

Yes, little boy.

[Iwannaplato]

The people picked candidate Trump, who has proven to be quite capable.

The Democrat Party decided to run Kamalala (who never won a primary), Biden (who couldn't find an exit) , and Hillary (instead of Commie Bernie, who was popular with Democrats at the time).

Trump is worthy. The other three were not.

The people picked Trump.
The Democrat Party picked the unworthy.

Their judgment sucks, and they disapprove of Trump, who is quite capable.

The Democrats know he is capable ... so they tried to make the case that he should not be caped, like a King.

Come, join with the people ... Join with the People's Choice.

Exactly. You justify what Trump has done in office, by not mentioning it at all and insulting candidates who deserve to be insulted but who are completely irrelevant to my post. It's all about teams and hating the other team. Not about what he said he would do and what he actually does. Drain the swamp, lol. No regime change lol.

Trump is worthy.

Basically you are reasserting what it was obvious you believed before. Maybe write it in caps next time when you want to have a really good justification for your position.

You're not even worth reading anymore. At least in the past you could must an argument.

[Walker]

Trump was worthy because of his record as a president and his ability to accomplish anything at all, given the sabotage by the deep state, which is well documented but increasingly under publicized.

But most of all, he was the people's choice as candidate.

The others were not.

But this is repetition.

I thought we were clear on this, or is truth irrelevant in this situation?

[Walker]

Exactly. You justify what Trump has done in office ...

I justified that he was The People's Choice the second time around because he had been president before, and then he survived the obvious persecution of the deep state. That appealed to The People, and he was elected.

It's all well documented.

The others? Proven losers.

If you disagree with that you're wrong, which you probably know, thus the irrelevant noise.

[Walker]

Exactly. You justify what Trump has done in office, by not mentioning it at all and insulting candidates who deserve to be insulted but who are completely irrelevant to my post. It's all about teams and hating the other team. Not about what he said he would do and what he actually does. Drain the swamp, lol. No regime change lol.

I overestimated you. play too.
Juvenile view much? lol.
You must be on the losing team.

Success needs no defense and delusion requires no refutation since it's mostly propaganda and immature thinking.

[Walker]

(continued)

Regarding Trump’s activities during his second term, which have been highly coordinated, organized, planned, and executed thus proving his capability for the functions of the executive office, capacities developed long before he ran for political office, here’s a more mature analysis than either lol or what you’ve picked up from the biased media.

If a presidential candidate were to say, vote for me and there will never be any wars, intelligent people would not believe it.

If a presidential candidate were to say, as Trump did, that he would not enter into any forever wars, intelligent people would believe it.

People more concerned with teams than truth would leave out the word “forever,” when referencing the topic.

Obviously, a forever war is a war that lasts for a long time.

Trump specifically stressed that the Iran War will be quick, and the purpose will be to end Iran as an existential threat. Time will determine the lie or truth of the predictions for quickness. So far it has proceeded along that strategy by wiping out the leadership and military capacity after failed negotiations.

What’s rather sick is TDS deliberately prolonging the war, God forbid, by interfering with the strategy of a quick war, simply for the political justification to call Trump a liar. That would be akin to the new Democrat tactic of shutting down the government and causing problems with government services, purely for political reasons to create discontent in the population, then promise the cure.

What Trump did with Iran ran counter to state department plans, which had been followed for decades.

Trump’s plan is not to fix everything, but rather to set in motion what he thinks will inevitably lead to peace in the long term, for future generations. He thinks like a patriarch. His reference point is his job description.

However, Trump did not say ... My plan is to set in motion what I think will inevitably lead to peace in the long term, for future generations. I think like a patriarch, and my reference point point is my job description.

Too vague, too abstract. He simply said, I'll drain the swamp. That's because he's a good communicator. Much too good for the TDS afflicted.

[Walker]

What causes JDS?