Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:26 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:10 pm

“you, supposedly, know 'the truth' about 'what', exactly?

Every thing, one thing, or some things?”

About God.

Okay. So, who and what is 'God', exactly?

God.

https://youtu.be/G29DXfcdhBg

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:51 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:25 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:08 pm

I don’t agree.

'you' do not agree with 'what', exactly, here?

It has already been proved, irrefutably, True that God can be seen. So, 'I' am not at all sure how 'you' could logically disagree with 'this'. But, then 'you' might be disagreeing with something else, here, entirely. Once more 'we' will have to wait, to see.

God cannot be seen. God is known, not seen.

Obviously 'you' are not yet able to describe God, exactly.

See, once 'you', also, know and understand who and what 'God' is, exactly, or maybe better worded, who and what the word 'God' has been referring to, exactly, then 'you' will also understand, fully, exactly how 'God' can be both very easily seen, [witnessed], and very easily seen, [understood].

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:52 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:26 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:10 pm

About God.

Okay. So, who and what is 'God', exactly?

God.

https://youtu.be/G29DXfcdhBg

And 'this', in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:59 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:52 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:26 pm

Okay. So, who and what is 'God', exactly?

God.

https://youtu.be/G29DXfcdhBg

And 'this', in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

No, actually, ‘this’, in a “psycho ward forum” of all places.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:58 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:51 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:25 pm

'you' do not agree with 'what', exactly, here?

It has already been proved, irrefutably, True that God can be seen. So, 'I' am not at all sure how 'you' could logically disagree with 'this'. But, then 'you' might be disagreeing with something else, here, entirely. Once more 'we' will have to wait, to see.

God cannot be seen. God is known, not seen.

Obviously 'you' are not yet able to describe God, exactly.

See, once 'you', also, know and understand who and what 'God' is, exactly, or maybe better worded, who and what the word 'God' has been referring to, exactly, then 'you' will also understand, fully, exactly how 'God' can be both very easily seen, [witnessed], and very easily seen, [understood].

I don’t agree.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:43 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:59 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:52 am

God.

https://youtu.be/G29DXfcdhBg

And 'this', in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

No, actually, ‘this’, in a “psycho ward forum” of all places.

If you want to believe this, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:44 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:58 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:51 am

God cannot be seen. God is known, not seen.

Obviously 'you' are not yet able to describe God, exactly.

See, once 'you', also, know and understand who and what 'God' is, exactly, or maybe better worded, who and what the word 'God' has been referring to, exactly, then 'you' will also understand, fully, exactly how 'God' can be both very easily seen, [witnessed], and very easily seen, [understood].

I don’t agree.

So, you agree that you can describe 'God', exactly, right?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:49 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:43 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:59 am

And 'this', in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

No, actually, ‘this’, in a “psycho ward forum” of all places.

If you want to believe this, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.

I wasn’t even expecting or asking for your approval.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:50 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:44 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:58 am

Obviously 'you' are not yet able to describe God, exactly.

See, once 'you', also, know and understand who and what 'God' is, exactly, or maybe better worded, who and what the word 'God' has been referring to, exactly, then 'you' will also understand, fully, exactly how 'God' can be both very easily seen, [witnessed], and very easily seen, [understood].

I don’t agree.

So, you agree that you can describe 'God', exactly, right?

I know God, and no word can describe God, or, every word describes God, because there is only God, in my opinion, this will never change. Take it or leave it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:53 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:49 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:43 pm

No, actually, ‘this’, in a “psycho ward forum” of all places.

If you want to believe this, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.

I wasn’t even expecting or asking for your approval.

I was not presuming that you were.

I was just pointing out that if 'the one' known as "fairy", here, wants to believe that 'this forum' is a 'psycho ward forum', then this is perfectly fine and okay, with me.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:55 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:50 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:44 pm
I don’t agree.

So, you agree that you can describe 'God', exactly, right?

I know God, and no word can describe God, or, every word describes God, because there is only God, in my opinion, this will never change. Take it or leave it.

But, if 'you' actually knew God, Itself, then you would also know that both of your claims, here, are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

Because God can be described with and by 'some words', and this is because there are 'some words' that describe God absolutely Accurately and Correctly.

Claiming that you 'know God', but when questioned and challenged you then claim that you can not describe God, or Falsely claim that God can be described by 'every word', is just another False and/or unsubstantiated claim of yours. If you can not explain, or describe, 'it' simply, then you do not understand 'it' well enough.

Again, as you keep proving so.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:58 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:53 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:49 pm

If you want to believe this, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.

I wasn’t even expecting or asking for your approval.

I was not presuming that you were.

I was just pointing out that if 'the one' known as "fairy", here, wants to believe that 'this forum' is a 'psycho ward forum', then this is perfectly fine and okay, with me.

And I was just pointing out that your approval is irrelevant to the discussion.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 1:02 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:58 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:53 pm
I wasn’t even expecting or asking for your approval.

I was not presuming that you were.

I was just pointing out that if 'the one' known as "fairy", here, wants to believe that 'this forum' is a 'psycho ward forum', then this is perfectly fine and okay, with me.

And I was just pointing out that your approval is irrelevant to the discussion.

But, 'I' am not giving, nor have I given, approval, nor disapproval.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 1:05 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 1:02 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:58 pm

I was not presuming that you were.

I was just pointing out that if 'the one' known as "fairy", here, wants to believe that 'this forum' is a 'psycho ward forum', then this is perfectly fine and okay, with me.

And I was just pointing out that your approval is irrelevant to the discussion.

But, 'I' am not giving, nor have I given, approval, nor disapproval.

Ok.

Bye then.

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:54 pm

When your face is an infant’s mirror, the mirror smiles first and is seen for who it is.