Page 3 of 3
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:24 am
by Maia
promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:17 am
Now there's a lass who loves her country. Utter the word England, and she gives you a history lesson with a Shakespearean addendum.
I couldn't tell you the first thing about my country. All i know is there were some indians and they had a big tea party in the boston harbor.
Quite an embarrassing display of disloyalty to His Majesty, I think, and such a waste, too. Tea doesn't grow on trees.
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:25 am
by FlashDangerpants
promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:17 am
Now there's a lass who loves her country. Utter the word England, and she gives you a history lesson with a Shakespearean addendum.
It won't be accurate though, we were last successfully invaded in 1688, we surrendered without a fight.
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:29 am
by Maia
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:25 am
promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:17 am
Now there's a lass who loves her country. Utter the word England, and she gives you a history lesson with a Shakespearean addendum.
It won't be accurate though, we were last successfully invaded in 1688, we surrendered without a fight.
William III was invited over by the leading faction in parliament, so to call it an invasion is a bit misleading. Perhaps, to clarify, one could say that 1066 represented the last successful invasion that was actively opposed.
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:26 am
by promethean75
^^^ Details, Flash.
Clearly, someone didn't read articles 13 and 26 in the 1688 referendum, Maia.
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:20 am
by Maia
promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:26 am
^^^ Details, Flash.
Clearly, someone didn't read articles 13 and 26 in the 1688 referendum, Maia.
Maybe there was Russian interference in that referendum, too.
Re: King to stick his oar in
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:23 am
by Maia
attofishpi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:32 am
Maia wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:29 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:25 am
It won't be accurate though, we were last successfully invaded in 1688, we surrendered without a fight.
William III was invited over by the leading faction in parliament, so to call it an invasion is a bit misleading. Perhaps, to clarify, one could say that 1066 represented the last successful invasion that was actively opposed.
The most prolific invasion is happening right now, courtesy of the mindset of those akin to Flashstupidpants and their open borders...
ALLOWING - the invasion of Pakistani, Middle Eastern, African (S) into our Western, currently ''""DEMOCRATIC""" system - of course, ONLY democratic until those INVADING cultures get their VOTE - ISLAMIFICATION of the WEST.
Best not go there, I think.