Philosophy Now Forum

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:33 am

Maia wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 8:39 am I spoke too soon. There was, indeed, a tick box this time, and I then had to sign in.

I've been having to sign in more so than I used to have to too. But it's good that Rick and team still keep the site going in spite of all the difficulties. Let's give a cheer to Rick and Philosophy Now!

Thank you.

I agree. There is obviously someone trying to sabotage the forum for whatever reason.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:43 am

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:33 am

Maia wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 8:39 am I spoke too soon. There was, indeed, a tick box this time, and I then had to sign in.

I've been having to sign in more so than I used to have to too. But it's good that Rick and team still keep the site going in spite of all the difficulties. Let's give a cheer to Rick and Philosophy Now!

Thank you.

I agree. There is obviously someone trying to sabotage the forum for whatever reason.

I hope not. But you might be right. If you are, I just wish they'd stop.

Maia wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 9:26 am I honestly thought so, but the forum keeps asking me, and then making me sign in again.

Verifying that we’re human could just be the subtle AI sense of humour, punking us with Turing Test irony.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:27 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:41 am It seems to have worked, the AI bot guests are gone. Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable.

'This one' is, STILL, BELIEVING things, which are COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

Not really, I don't know how many of you are there according to you, but to us they are all Age, and to us they are all one and the same being.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:02 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:27 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:41 am It seems to have worked, the AI bot guests are gone. Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable.

'This one' is, STILL, BELIEVING things, which are COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

Not really, I don't know how many of you are there according to you, but to us they are all Age, and to us they are all one and the same being.

AGAIN 'this one' is BELIEVING things, which are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

One day it MIGHT LEARN.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 11:00 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:02 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:27 am

'This one' is, STILL, BELIEVING things, which are COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

Not really, I don't know how many of you are there according to you, but to us they are all Age, and to us they are all one and the same being.

AGAIN 'this one' is BELIEVING things, which are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

One day it MIGHT LEARN.

So the 'i' and the 'I' are the same now?

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:10 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 11:00 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:02 pm

Not really, I don't know how many of you are there according to you, but to us they are all Age, and to us they are all one and the same being.

AGAIN 'this one' is BELIEVING things, which are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

One day it MIGHT LEARN.

So the 'i' and the 'I' are the same now?

What would MAkE you SAY, and CLAIM, such a thing as 'here', with a question mark at the end of it?

OBVIOUSLY. one only has to 'LOOK' TO 'SEE' that those two things are NOT 'the same', 'now', NOR EVER.

ONCE MORE, what 'we' can CLEARLY SEE, here, is just HOW MUCH ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING things, BEFORE ACTUAL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED, FIRST, one can be, and IS, LED COMPLETELY ASTRAY.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:31 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:10 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 11:00 pm

AGAIN 'this one' is BELIEVING things, which are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY False, and Wrong.

One day it MIGHT LEARN.

So the 'i' and the 'I' are the same now?

What would MAkE you SAY, and CLAIM, such a thing as 'here', with a question mark at the end of it?

OBVIOUSLY. one only has to 'LOOK' TO 'SEE' that those two things are NOT 'the same', 'now', NOR EVER.

ONCE MORE, what 'we' can CLEARLY SEE, here, is just HOW MUCH ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING things, BEFORE ACTUAL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED, FIRST, one can be, and IS, LED COMPLETELY ASTRAY.

You really can't even put 2 and 2 together, huh.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:34 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:31 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:10 am
So the 'i' and the 'I' are the same now?

What would MAkE you SAY, and CLAIM, such a thing as 'here', with a question mark at the end of it?

OBVIOUSLY. one only has to 'LOOK' TO 'SEE' that those two things are NOT 'the same', 'now', NOR EVER.

ONCE MORE, what 'we' can CLEARLY SEE, here, is just HOW MUCH ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING things, BEFORE ACTUAL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED, FIRST, one can be, and IS, LED COMPLETELY ASTRAY.

You really can't even put 2 and 2 together, huh.

'Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable'

LOL

And, it is 'this one' who CLAIMS that it is 'me' who, really, can NOT put 'things' together, here.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:21 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:34 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:31 am

What would MAkE you SAY, and CLAIM, such a thing as 'here', with a question mark at the end of it?

OBVIOUSLY. one only has to 'LOOK' TO 'SEE' that those two things are NOT 'the same', 'now', NOR EVER.

ONCE MORE, what 'we' can CLEARLY SEE, here, is just HOW MUCH ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING things, BEFORE ACTUAL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED, FIRST, one can be, and IS, LED COMPLETELY ASTRAY.

You really can't even put 2 and 2 together, huh.

'Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable'

LOL

And, it is 'this one' who CLAIMS that it is 'me' who, really, can NOT put 'things' together, here.

Yes and my claim is turning out to be correct again.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:32 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:21 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:34 am
You really can't even put 2 and 2 together, huh.

'Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable'

LOL

And, it is 'this one' who CLAIMS that it is 'me' who, really, can NOT put 'things' together, here.

Yes and my claim is turning out to be correct again.

LOL What an ABSOLUTE IDIOT.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY STILL, has ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA AT ALL IN REGARDS TO WHAT I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT AND REFERRING TO,.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:36 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:32 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:21 am

'Unfortunately Age believes itself to be 2 or more beings and one of them is human, so the forum is still unusable'

LOL

And, it is 'this one' who CLAIMS that it is 'me' who, really, can NOT put 'things' together, here.

Yes and my claim is turning out to be correct again.

LOL What an ABSOLUTE IDIOT.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY STILL, has ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA AT ALL IN REGARDS TO WHAT I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT AND REFERRING TO,.

You're the one who has no idea about it.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:43 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:36 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:32 am
Yes and my claim is turning out to be correct again.

LOL What an ABSOLUTE IDIOT.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY STILL, has ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA AT ALL IN REGARDS TO WHAT I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT AND REFERRING TO,.

You're the one who has no idea about it.

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' MAKES ANOTHER CLAIM,, here, now, let 'us' SEE IF 'this one' can CLARIFY, AS WELL, 'THIS TIME'.

SO, what IS 'it', EXACTLY, "atla"?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:59 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:43 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:36 am

LOL What an ABSOLUTE IDIOT.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY STILL, has ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA AT ALL IN REGARDS TO WHAT I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT AND REFERRING TO,.

You're the one who has no idea about it.

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' MAKES ANOTHER CLAIM,, here, now, let 'us' SEE IF 'this one' can CLARIFY, AS WELL, 'THIS TIME'.

SO, what IS 'it', EXACTLY, "atla"?

What is what?

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 5:03 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:59 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:43 am

You're the one who has no idea about it.

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' MAKES ANOTHER CLAIM,, here, now, let 'us' SEE IF 'this one' can CLARIFY, AS WELL, 'THIS TIME'.

SO, what IS 'it', EXACTLY, "atla"?

What is what?

SO, ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' HAS MANAGED TO COMPLETELY MISS the BLATANTLY OBVIOUS, here. 'This one' can NOT even 'KEEP UP', let alone 'CATCH UP', and JUST GAIN AN IDEA, here.

LOOK, 'you', the one known as "atla", here, WROTE 'the words', 'You're the one who has no idea about it'.

I then just ASKED 'you', 'So, what IS 'it', EXACTLY, "atla"?

The 'it' word that I put in single quotation marks was IN DIRECT RELATION TO your USE of the 'it' word.

So, verbatim my 'it' word IS REFERRING TO your 'it' word.

AGAIN, 'one day' 'this one' MIGHT LEARN.